Practices for Utility Coordination in Transit Projects (2015)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

45 REFERENCES 1. 2013 Public Transportation Fact Book, American Pub- lic Transportation Association, Washington, D.C., 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.apta.com/resources/ statistics/Pages/transitstats.aspx [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 2. Cervero, R. and J. Zupan, Commuter and Light Rail Tran- sit Corridor: The Land Use Connection, TCRP Project H-1, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996. 3. Campion, D.R., C. Neathery, J. Reinfurt, P. Bailey- Campbell, D. Schulz, and D. Sillars, Project and Con- struction Management Guidelines, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011. 4. Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) (Public Law 112-141, 126 Stat. 405). 5. United States Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Part 645—Utilities (23 CFR 645), 2000 [Online]. Available: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid= b7f7c4449f0f70b7da723fbaaac8d4ce&rgn=div5&view= text&node=23:1.0.1.7.26&idno=23 [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 6. “Project Management Oversight (PMO) Lessons Learned,” Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.fta.dot.gov/ grants/12831_9588.html [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 7. Legal Research Digest 31: Guide to Federal Buy Amer- ica Requirements—2009 Supplement, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010. 8. “Application of Buy America Requirements to Utility Relocations,” letter to the U.S. Secretary of Transporta- tion signed by representatives of 11 public-sector and private-sector transportation and utility associations, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.apta.com/gap/letters/ 2013/Pages/130628_LaHood_Foxx.aspx [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 9. “Application of Buy America to non FHWA-funded Util- ity Relocations,” memorandum to Division Administrators and Directors of Field Services, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C., 2013 [Online]. Available: http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/130711.cfm [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 10. “Letter to New Starts Working Group,” Federal Tran- sit Administration, Washington, D.C., 2012 [online]. Available: http://www.fta.dot.gov/legislation_law/12316_ 15059.html [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 11. Booz Allen Hamilton, TCRP Web-Only Document 31: Managing Capital Costs of Major Federally Funded Public Transportation Projects, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005. 12. Touran, A., D.D. Gransberg, K.R. Molenaar, K. Ghavamifar, D.J. Mason, and L.A. Fithian, TCRP Report 131: A Guidebook for the Evaluation of Project Delivery Projects, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. 13. TCRP Legal Research Digest 39: Competition Require- ments of the Design/Build, Construction Manager at Risk, and Public-Private Partnership Contracts—Seven Case Studies, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012. 14. Quiroga, C.A., D. Ford, T. Taylor, S. Kranc, E. Kraus, and E.S. Park, Specification Framework for Communica- tion Utilities and Estimation of Utility Adjustment Costs, Publication FHWA/TX-08/0-4998-3, Texas Transporta- tion Institute, College Station, 2007. 15. A Guide for Accommodating Utilities within Highway Right-of-Way, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2005. 16. A Policy on the Accommodation of Utilities within Free- way Right-of-Way, American Association of State High- way and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2005. 17. Guidance on Sharing Freeway and Highway Rights-of- Way for Telecommunications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1996. 18. Program Guide, Utility Relocation and Accommodation on Federal-Aid Highway Projects, Sixth edition, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2003. 19. Accommodation of Utility Plant within the Rights of Way of Urban Streets and Highways: Manual of Improved Practice, American Public Works Association, Ameri- can Society of Civil Engineers, Chicago, Ill., 1974. 20. Riley, O., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 115: Reducing Construction Conflicts between Highways and Utilities, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984. 21. Thorne, J., D. Turner, and J. Lindly, Highway/Utility Guide, Report FHWA-SA-93-049, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1993. 22. Thomas, H.R. and R. Ellis, Avoiding Delays during the Construction Phase of Highway Projects, NCHRP Proj- ect 20-24(12), Unedited Final Report, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001. 23. Right of Way and Utilities Guidelines and Best Practices, Strategic Plan 4-4, Subcommittee on Right-of-Way and Utilities, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2004. 24. Moeller, R., et al., European Right of Way and Utilities Best Practices, Report FHWA-PL-02-013, Federal High- way Administration, Washington, D.C., 2002. 25. Campbell, J., et al., Streamlining and Integrating Right-of- Way and Utility Processes with Planning, Environmental, and Design Processes in Australia and Canada, Office of International Programs, Federal Highway Administration,

46 American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials, Washington, D.C., 2009, 80 pp. 26. Avoiding Utility Relocations, Publication DTFH61-01- C-00024, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2002. 27. Ellis, R., M. Venner, C. Paulsen, J. Anspach, G. Adams, and K. Vanderbergh, Integrating the Priorities of Transporta- tion Agencies and Utility Companies, Report S2-R15-RW, Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. 28. Quiroga, C.A., E. Kraus, P. Scott, T. Swafford, P. Meis, and G. Monday, Identification of Utility Conflicts and Solutions, Report S2-R15B-RW-1, Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012. 29. Quiroga, C.A., E. Kraus, P. Scott, J. Anspach, T. Swafford, and P. Meis, Identification of Utility Conflicts and Solu- tions: Pilot Implementation of the SHRP 2 R15B Prod- ucts at the Maryland State Highway Administration, Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, 105 pp. 30. Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data, Standard ASCE/ CI 38-02, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., 2002. 31. Sterling, R.L., et al., Encouraging Innovation in Locat- ing and Characterizing Underground Utilities, Report S2-R01-RW, Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- emies, Washington, D.C., 2009. 32. Lew, J., Cost Savings on Highway Projects Utilizing Subsurface Utility Engineering, Report FHWA-IF-00- 014, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2000. 33. Kraus, E., Y. Li, J. Overman, and C. Quiroga, Utility Inves- tigation Best Practices and Effects on TxDOT Highway Improvement Projects, Report FHWA/TX-13/0-6631-1, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, 2013. 34. Anspach, J. and R. Murphy, ACRP Synthesis 34: Subsur- face Utility Engineering Information Management for Airports, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012. 35. “Fact Sheet,” Sacramento Regional Transit District, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.sacrt.com/documents/ RT%20Fact%20Sheets/RT%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 36. “Utilities Coordination List (ABC),” Sacramento County Department of Transportation, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.sacdot.com/Pages/Utilities%20Coordination %20List-ABC.aspx [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 37. “Fast Facts,” Charlotte Area Transit System, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://charmeck.org/city/charlotte/cats/news/ Pages/facts.aspx [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 38. “CATS Financial Information,” Charlotte Area Tran- sit System, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://charmeck. org/city/charlotte/cats/about/budget/Pages/default.aspx [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 39. Annual Report for the Year 2013, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, Cleveland, Ohio, 2014. 40. Request for Proposal, Project 24-R, Architect/Engineer Services for E. 116th Station Design, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, Cleveland, Ohio, 2013. 41. “TriMet At-a-Glance,” TriMet, 2014 [Online]. Avail- able: http://trimet.org/publications/index.htm [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 42. “Streetcar History,” Portland Streetcar, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://portlandstreetcar.org/node/33 [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 43. “Portland Streetcar, Inc.—Overview,” Portland Streetcar, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.portlandstreetcar. org/node/25 [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 44. Transit Agency Operating Data FY2014–2015, TriMet, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.trimet.org/pdfs/ meetings/stfac/stf-formula-applications/2014/transit- agency-operating-data-1-23-14-combined.pdf [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 45. Adopted Budget 2013–2014, TriMet, 2013 [Online]. Avail- able: http://trimet.org/pdfs/publications/FY14-adopted- budget.pdf [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 46. FY 2014 Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets, Port Authority of Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, Pa., 2014. 47. “Welcome to NTD Data,” National Transit Database, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ ntdprogram/data.htm [accessed Oct. 16, 2014]. 48. Year in Review, Utah Transit Authority, Salt Lake City, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.rideuta.com/ uploads/UTAYearinReview2012.pdf [accessed Oct. 16, 2014].