Design Guidance for Channelized Right-Turn Lanes (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Chapter 8. References 1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2004. 2. U.S. Access Board, Revised Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights of Way, November 23, 2005, www.access-board.gov/prowac/draft.htm. 3. Potts, I. B., D. W. Harwood, D. J. Torbic, D. K. S. A. Hennum, C. B. Tiesler, J. D. Zegeer, J. F. Ringert, D. L. Harkey, and J. M. Barlow, Synthesis on Channelized Right Turns on Urban and Suburban Arterials, Final Report, NCHRP Project 3-72, Midwest Research Institute, August 2006. 4. Dixon, K. K., J. L. Hibbard, and H. Nyman, “Right-Turn Treatment for Signalized Intersections,” Urban Street Symposium, Transportation Research Circular E-C019, 1999. 5. Fitzpatrick, K., W. H. Schneider, and E. S. Park, “Operations and Safety of Right-Turn-Lane Designs,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1961, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. 6. Staplin, L., D. L. Harkey, K. H. Lococo, and M. S. Tarawneh, Intersection Geometric Design and Operational Guidelines for Older Drivers and Pedestrians, Volume I: Final Report, Report No. FHWA-RD-96-132, Federal Highway Administration, June 1997. 7. Tarawneh, M. S. and P. T. McCoy, “Effect of Intersection Channelization and Skew on Driver Performance,” Transportation Research Record 1523, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996. 8. McCoy, P. T., R. R Bishu, J. A. Bonneson, J. W. Fitts, M. D. Fowler, S. L. Gaber, M. E. Lutjeharms, B. A. Moen, and D. L. Sicking, Guidelines for Free Right-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections on Rural Two-Lane Highways—Final Report, Report No. TRP- 02-32-95, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Nebraska Department of Roads, March 1995. 9. Abdel-Aty, M. and P. Nawathe, “A Novel Approach for Signalized Intersection Crash Classification and Prediction,” Advances in Transportation Studies, Vol. 9, 2006. 10. Hunter, W. W., J. C. Stutts, W. E. Pein, and C. L. Cox, Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Types of the Early 1990’s, Report No. FHWA-RD-95-163, Federal Highway Administration, June 1996. 11. North Carolina Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes (www.pedbikeinfo.org/pbcat), Division of Pedestrian and Bicycle North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, North Carolina, November 2003. 12. Harkey, D. L., J. Mekemson, M. C. Chen, and K. Krull, Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Analysis Tool, Product No. FHWA-RD-99-192, Federal Highway Administration, December 1999. 13. Oregon Department of Transportation, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, 1995. 103

14. Zegeer, C. V., C. Seiderman, P. Lagerwey, M. Cynecki, M. Ronkin, and B. Schneider, Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide: Providing Safety and Mobility, Report No. FHWA- RD-01-102, Federal Highway Administration, March 2002. 15. Geruschat, D. R. and S. E. Hassan, “Driver Behavior in Yielding to Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at Roundabouts,” Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, Vol. 99, No. 5, 2005. 16. Schroeder, B. J., N. M. Rouphail, and R. S. W. Emerson, “Exploratory Analysis of Crossing Difficulties for Blind and Sighted Pedestrians at Channelized Turn Lanes,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1956, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. 17. Guth, D., D. Ashmead, R. Long, R. Wall, and P. Ponchillia. “Blind and Sighted Pedestrians’ Judgments of Gaps in Traffic at Roundabouts,” Human Factors, Volume 47, 2005. 18. Ashmead, D., D. Guth, R. Wall, R. Long, and P. Ponchillia. “Street Crossing by Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at a Modern Roundabout,” ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 11, November 2005. 19. Inman, V. W., G. W. Davis, and D. Sauerburger, Pedestrian Access to Roundabouts: Assessment of Motorists’ Yielding to Visually Impaired Pedestrians and Potential Treatments to Improve Access, Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-HRT-05-080, McLean, Virginia, 2006. 20. Schroeder, B., R. Hughes, N. Rouphail, C. Cunningham, K. Salamati, R. Long, D. Guth, R.W. Emerson, D. Kim, J. Barlow, B.L. (Beezy) Bentzen, L. Rodegerdts, and E. Myers, NCHRP Report 674: Crossing Solutions at Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for Pedestrians with Vision Disabilities, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., January 2011. 21. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Traffic Safety Facts 2002, Pedalcyclists, Report No. DOT HS 809 613, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2003. 22. Tan, C., Crash-Type Manual for Bicyclists, Report No. FHWA-RD-96-104, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996. 23. Clarke, A. and L. Tracy, Bicycle Safety-Related Research Synthesis, Report No. FHWA-94-062, Federal Highway Administration, 1995. 24. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Highways and Streets, Washington, D.C., 2009. 25. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, Washington, D.C., 1999. 26. Hunter, W. W., D. L. Harkey, J. R. Stewart, and M. L. Birk, Evaluation of the Blue Bike Lane Treatment Used in Bicycle/Motor Vehicle Conflict Areas in Portland, Oregon, Report No. FHWA-RD-00-150, Federal Highway Administration, August 2000. 27. Hunter, W. W., Evaluation of a Combined Bicycle Lane/Right-Turn Lane in Eugene, Oregon, Publication No. FHWA-RD-00-151, Federal Highway Administration, August 2000. 104

28. Harkey, D. L., D. W. Reinfurt, M. Knuiman, J. R. Stewart, and A. Sorton, Development of the Bicycle Compatibility Index: A Level of Service Concept, Report No. FHWA-RD-98-072, Federal Highway Administration, December 1998. 29. Neuman, T. R., NCHRP Report 279: Intersection Channelization Design Guide, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985. 30. Conversation with Mr. Jeffrey Bagdade, Opus International Consultants, at a meeting of the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Mobile, Alabama, June 2008. 31. Highway Capacity Manual, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 32. Harwood, D. W., D. J. Torbic, D. K. Gilmore, C. D. Bokenkroger, J. M. Dunn, C. V. Zegeer, R. Srinivasan, D. Carter, C. Raborn, C. Lyon, and B. Persaud, NCHRP Web-Only Document 129: Phase III Pedestrian Safety Prediction Methodology. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. 33. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Highway Safety Manual, 2010. 105