Strategies to Optimize Real Property Acquisition, Relocation Assistance, and Property Management Practices (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

124 1. Federal Highway Administration, Project Development Guide. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., May 19, 2009. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/pdg.htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 2. Federal Highway Administration, FHWA Scan on Advance Acquisi- tion and Corridor Preservation. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., September 2005. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real estate/scans/richfreport.htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 3. Federal Highway Administration, Future Needs of Public Sector Real Estate with Graphic Illustrations. Report FHWA-HEP-06-032, Office of Real Estate Services, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., August 2006. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/ fnpsrwgraph.htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 4. Federal Highway Administration, Public Sector Real Estate Certifi- cation Needs Analysis. Report FHWA-HEP-07-027, Office of Real Estate Services, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., March 2006. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/pubsectcert.htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 5. Wainright, M., and D. Blakeney, Uniform Act Update, Federal Agency Update Symposium, Las Vegas, Nevada, January 14, 2009. 6. Federal Highway Administration, Synthesize Division Interagency Real Estate Agreements and Identify Practices for Improved Interagency Support. Office of Planning, Environment, and Realty, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., undated. http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/practitioners/uniform_act/acquisition/ interagency/page01.cfm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 7. Federal Highway Administration, Effectiveness and Impacts of FHWA’s Implementation of the 49 CFR 24.102(c)(2) Appraisal Waiver. Report DTFH 61-05-T-27009, Office of Real Estate Services, Federal High- way Administration, Washington, D.C., February 2007. http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/practitioners/uniform_act/acquisition/ appraisal_waiver/appwaiv.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 8. Federal Highway Administration, Risk Management. Innovative Project Delivery. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., undated. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/project_delivery/ resources/risk_management/index.htm#main_content. Accessed October 21, 2013. 9. MITRE, Risk Management Toolkit. MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts, June 2011. http://www.mitre.org/work/sepo/toolkits/ risk/index.html. Accessed October 21, 2013. 10. Campbell, J., G. Solomon, G. Fawver, R. Lorello, D. Mathis, C. Quiroga, B. Rhinehart, B. Ward, J. Zaharewicz, and N. Zembillas. Streamlining and Integrating Right-of-Way and Utility Processes with Planning, Environmental, and Design Processes in Australia and Canada. Report FHWA-PL-09-011, Office of International Programs, Federal Highway Administration, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., June 2009. http://international.fhwa.dot.gov/pubs/pl09011/. Accessed October 21, 2013. 11. Federal Highway Administration, 2008 FHWA Incentive Payments Peer Exchange Report. Office of Planning, Environment, and Realty, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., August 2008. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/practitioners/uniform_act/ acquisition/incpeerexch.cfm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 12. Federal Highway Administration, Right-of-Way Design-Build and Alternative Contracting Peer Exchange. Report FHWA-HEP-10-015, Office of Planning, Environment, and Real Estate Services, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., November 2009. http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/dbaltcont.htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 13. Federal Highway Administration, Business Relocation Assistance Retrospective Study Final Report. Report DTFH-61-10-F-00097, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., undated. http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/publications/business_relocation_ assistance/final_report/dtfh611f00097.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 14. Federal Highway Administration, Coordination with Railroads to Facilitate Acquisition of ROW. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 2012. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ real_estate/publications/row_railroad_coordination/finalacqrow.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 15. Saka, A., Geographic Information System Implementation of State Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Programs. Office of Real Estate Services, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., July 2004. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/rowsurvjuly04.htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 16. Hancock, K., Research Results Digest 310: Integrating Geospatial Technologies Into the Right-of-Way Data-Management Process. NCHRP Project 08-55, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., December 2006. http:// onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_310.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 17. Hancock, K., Developing a Logical Model for a Geo-Spatial Right- of-Way Land Management System. Contractor’s Final Report for NCHRP Project 8-55A. Transportation Research Board of the References

125 National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, available at www.trb.org by searching for “NCHRP 08-55A”. 18. Quiroga, C. A., E. Kraus, N. A. Koncz, S. Lyle, and Y. Li, Right-of- Way Real Property Asset Management—Prototype Data Architecture. Report FHWA/TX-09/0-5788-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas Department of Transportation, College Station, Texas, Feb- ruary 2009. http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-5788-1.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 19. Quiroga, C. A., E. Kraus, and J. Le, Strategic Plan to Optimize the Management of Right-of-Way Parcel and Utility Information at FDOT. Report BDR74 977-03, Texas A&M Transportation Insti- tute, Florida Department of Transportation, College Station, Texas, May 2013. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/research-center/Completed_ Proj/Summary_Map/FDOT-BDR74-977-03-rpt.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 20. U.S. Department of the Interior, GeoCommunicator. Bureau of Land Management, undated. http://www.geocommunicator.gov/ GeoComm/index.shtm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 21. FGDC, Cadastral Data Content Standard Version 1.4. Subcommittee on Cadastral Data, Federal Geographic Data Committee, Reston, Virginia, May 2008. http://nationalcad.org/download/cadastral- data-content-standard-ver-1-4/. Accessed October 21, 2013. 22. FGDC Cadastral Subcommittee, CADNSDI Publication Standard Version 2. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Reston, Virginia, October 2012. http://nationalcad.org/download/cadnsdi-publication- standard-version-2/. Accessed October 21, 2013. 23. Erwin, D., TxDOT Right-of-Way Management Information System. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, 2011. 24. Erwin, D., Right-of-Way Asset Management. 2012 Transportation Short Course, Texas Department of Transportation, College Station, Texas, 2012. http://tti.tamu.edu/conferences/tsc12/program/row.php. Accessed October 21, 2013. 25. Federal Highway Administration, Visualization for Right-of-Way Acquisition. Office of Planning, Environment, and Real Estate Ser- vices, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/publications/visualization_ for_row_acquisition/visrow00.cfm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 26. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., NCHRP Project 20-68 Final Scan-Tour Report: U.S. Domestic Scan Program: Best Practices in Right-of-Way Acquisition and Utility Relocation (online publication). National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., December 2006. http://onlinepubs.trb. org/onlinepubs/trbnet/acl/FR1_NCHRP2068_Right-of-Way_ all-in-one.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 27. Waltersheid, D., Use of Visualization Technology for Right-of-Way Acquisition and Eminent Domain. Presented at the 5th Inter national Symposium and Workshop Visualization in Transportation, Denver, Colorado, October 23–26, 2006. http://www.teachamerica.com/ VIZ/08_Waltersheid/index.htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 28. National BIM Standard-United States™ (NBIMS-US™), Version 2. National Institute of Building Sciences, buildingSMART alliance, Washington, D.C., 2013. http://www.nationalbimstandard.org/. Accessed October 21, 2013. 29. U.S. DOT, Property Management Tools and Techniques. Models for the Effective Management of Real Property Assets at State Departments of Transportation. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Cambridge, Massachusetts, September 2012. http://www.fhwa. dot.gov/real_estate/publications/property_management_tools/ property_management_report.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 30. Federal Highway Administration, Real Estate Acquisition Guide for Local Public Agencies. U.S. Department of Transportation, Wash- ington, D.C., 2009. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/lpaguide/ toc.htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 31. Federal Highway Administration, Flexibility in Highway Design. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1997. http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/environment/flex/index.htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 32. AASHTO, A Guide for Achieving Flexibility in Highway Design. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., May 2004. 33. OMG, Documents Associated with Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0. Object Management Group, January 2011. http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/. Accessed October 21, 2013. 34. Texas DOT, Roadway Design Manual. Texas Department of Trans- portation, Austin, Texas, May 2010. http://onlinemanuals.txdot. gov/txdotmanuals/rdw/index.htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 35. New York State DOT, Project Development Manual (PDM). New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, New York. undated. https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/design/dqab/pdm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 36. Wyoming DOT, Guide for Interstate Highways 4R-3R-2R-1R Criteria. WYDOT Design Guides. Wyoming Department of Transportation, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 2008. http://www.dot.state.wy.us/files/live/ sites/wydot/files/shared/Project%20Development/Road%20Design %20Manual_1/8-01%20%20(Dec_2008).pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 37. Washington State DOT, Design Manual. Volume 1—Procedures. Manual M 22-01.09, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, July 2012. 38. Florida DOT, Efficient Transportation Decision Making Manual. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Florida, July 2013. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/emo/pubs/etdm/etdmmanual.shtm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 39. Florida DOT, Project Development & Environmental Project Man- agement. Project Management Handbook, Part 2—Phase Specific Project Management Issues. Florida Department of Transporta- tion, Tallahassee, Florida, March 2008. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/ projectmanagementoffice/PMHandbook/P2_Ch02.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 40. Florida DOT, Efficient Transportation Decision Making Manual. Chapter 2. ETDM Process. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Florida, July 2013. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/emo/ pubs/etdm/650-000-002_ETDM_Manual_Ch2_2013-0730.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 41. Maine DOT, Maine DOT Highway Design Guide Volume I: National Standards. Maine Department of Transportation, Augusta, Maine, December 2004. http://www.maine.gov/mdot/technicalpubs/hdg. htm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 42. New Jersey DOT, Capital Project Delivery. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, New Jersey, August 13, 2012. http:// www.state.nj.us/transportation/capital/pd/. Accessed October 21, 2013. 43. Ohio DOT, ODOT’s Project Development Process—Training and Tool- kit. Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio, undated. http://www.dot.state.oh.us/projects/pdp/Pages/training.aspx. Accessed October 21, 2013. 44. Vermont Agency of Transportation, Project Development Process Manual. Vermont Agency of Transportation, Montpelier, Vermont,

126 undated. http://vtransengineering.vermont.gov/sites/aot_program_ development/files/documents/publications/FlowChart.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 45. Washington State DOT, Deliverable Expectation Matrix. Washing- ton State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, September 8, 2011. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/fulltext/ ProjectMgmt/DEM/DE_Matrix.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 46. GAO, Highway Infrastructure. Preliminary Information on the Timely Completion of Highway Construction Projects. Report GAO-02-1067T, United States General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C., Septem- ber 2002. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d021067t.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 47. AASHTO, Transportation. Invest in Our Future. Accelerating Project Delivery. American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials, Washington, D.C., August 2007. http://downloads. transportation.org/TIF7-1.pdf. October 21, 2013. 48. Florida DOT, Project Management Handbook. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Florida, 2013. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/ projectmanagementoffice/PMHandbook/pmhandbookindex.shtm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 49. Thakur, M., “Mn/DOT’s Project Development Process.” PowerPoint presentation to the Transportation Strategic Management and Oper- ations Advisory Task Force, Shoreview, Minnesota, October 2008. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/updates/pdf/Project%20Development %20-%20Construction.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 50. Green, F., “Right-of-Way Scheduling and Impacts.” PowerPoint presentation to the 2011 Joint Right-of-Way and Utilities and Design Subcommittee Meeting, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, St. Louis, Missouri, May 9–13, 2011. http://modot.org/business/outdoor_advertising/documents/ AASHTO%20Presentations%202011/ROW%20Scheduling%20 and%20Impacts1.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 51. Gibson, G., J. O’Connor, R. Chang, S. Hedemann, and W. Chong, Durations for Acquiring Roadway Right-of-Way and Assorted Expe- diting Strategies. Report FHWA/TX-06/0-4617-1, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, May 2006. http://www.utexas. edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/0_4617_1.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 52. Washington State DOT, February 8, 2006 GMAP Report. Project Delivery and Risks. Washington State Department of Transporta- tion, Olympia, Washington, February 8, 2006. ftp://ftp.wsdot.wa.gov/ public/GMAP/GMAP_Feb/WSDOT%20GMAP%20February%20 8%202006.ppt. Accessed October 21, 2013. 53. Anderson, S., K. Molenaar, C. Schexnayder, NCHRP Report 625: Procedures Guide for Right-of-Way Cost Estimation and Cost Man- agement. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ nchrp/nchrp_rpt_625-2.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 54. Fiol, M., J. Bohard, M. W. DeLong, C. Kay, P. Knaster, J. H. Lambert, C. Glendening, and S. A. Thekdi, NCHRP Project 20-68A, Scan 10-01: Best Practices for Risk-Based Forecasts of Land Volatility for Corridor Management and Sustainable Communities. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., January 2012. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP20- 68A_10-01.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 55. Williams, K., NCHRP Synthesis 337: Cooperative Agreements for Corridor Management. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004. http://onlinepubs.trb. org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_337.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 56. ICF Consulting, Reevaluations of NEPA Documents, NCHRP Proj- ect 25-25, Task 28 Final Report. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., March 2008. 57. Interagency Land Acquisition Conference, Uniform Appraisal Stan- dards for Federal Land Acquisitions, 5th ed., The Appraisal Insti- tute, Chicago, IL, 2000. http://www.justice.gov/enrd/ENRD_Assets/ Uniform-Appraisal-Standards.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 58. Context Sensitive Solutions, 2005. http://contextsensitivesolutions. org/. Accessed October 21, 2013. 59. Anderson, S., K. Molenaar, and C. Schexnayder, NCHRP Report 574: Guidance for Cost Estimation and Management for Highway Projects During Planning, Programming, and Preconstruction. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_574.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 60. Thiel, J., Problems of Access to Contaminated Properties for Eval- uation. Presented at 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1995. 61. Thomas, L. W., Selected Studies in Transportation Law, Volume 2. Eminent Domain. NCHRP and TCRP, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. 62. Quiroga, C. A., E. Kraus, J. Overman, and N. Koncz, Integration of Utility and Environmental Activities in the Project Development Process. Report FHWA/TX-10/0-6065-1, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, January 2010. http://tti.tamu.edu/ publications/catalog/record_detail.htm?id=32621. Accessed Octo- ber 21, 2013. 63. Federal Highway Administration, Planning and Environment Linkages: Effective Practices. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., undated. http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/integ/ practices.asp. Accessed October 21, 2013. 64. Federal Highway Administration, Shortening Project Delivery Toolkit. Planning and Environmental Linkages Questionnaire. U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Washington, D.C., April 5, 2011. http://www. environment.fhwa.dot.gov/integ/pel_quest.asp. Accessed October 21, 2013. 65. Emerson, D. J., and C. Hoeffner, Improved Linkage Between Trans- portation Systems Planning and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). PB Consult, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, NCHRP Project 08-36A, Task 48, Final Report. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. http:// onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP08-36(48)_ FR.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 66. Smith, L., and D. Suciu-Smith, FAQs about NEPA Reevaluation. The Environmental Quarterly, Volume 5, Issue 2. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Spring 2009. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/resourcecenter/teams/environment/ publications.cfm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 67. SHRP 2 Report S2-R16-RR-1: Strategies for Improving the Project Agreement Process between Highway Agencies and Railroads. Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010. http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/164283.aspx. Accessed October 21, 2013. 68. Federal Highway Administration, Fixed Residential Moving Cost Schedule (2012), Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., June 2012. http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/practitioners/uniform_act/relocation/ moving_cost_schedule.cfm. Accessed October 21, 2013. 69. GASB, Statement No. 34. Basic Financial Statements—and Manage- ment’s Discussion and Analysis—for State and Local Governments.

127 Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, Connecticut, June 1999. http://www.gasb.org/st/summary/gstsm34.html. Accessed October 21, 2013. 70. Federal Highway Administration, Outdoor Advertising Control, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., undated. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/practitioners/oac/. Accessed October 21, 2013. 71. Daluge, M. J., M. DeLong, L. Hanig, H. Kalla, C. Klauer, K. Klein, S. Klekar, L. McMillan, C. A. Quiroga, J. Soule, M. Tracy, and B. Wessinger, Outdoor Advertising Control Practices in Australia, Europe, and Japan, Report FHWA-PL-10-031, Office of International Programs, Federal Highway Administration, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., May 2011. http://www.international.fhwa.dot.gov/pubs/pl11023/ pl11023.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2013. 72. AASHTO, A Policy on the Accommodation of Utilities within Freeway Right-Of-Way, American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2005. 73. AASHTO, A Guide for Accommodating Utilities within Highway Right- Of-Way, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2005. 74. Quiroga, C. A., E. Kraus, P. Scott, T. Swafford, P. Meis, and G. Monday, Identification of Utility Conflicts and Solutions. Final Report. Report S2-R15B-RW-1, Second Strategic Highway Research Program, Texas Transportation Institute, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., October 2012. http://www.trb.org/main/ blurbs/166731.aspx. Accessed October 21, 2013. 75. ASCE, Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Exist- ing Subsurface Utility Data, Standard ASCE/CI 38-02, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, 2002.