National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 6 - Conclusions: Accomplishments and Needs
Page 82
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Development of Tools for Assessing Wider Economic Benefits of Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22502.
×
Page 82
Page 83
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Development of Tools for Assessing Wider Economic Benefits of Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22502.
×
Page 83
Page 84
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Development of Tools for Assessing Wider Economic Benefits of Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22502.
×
Page 84

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

82 Alstadt, B., G. Weisbrod, and D. Cutler. 2012. Relationship of Transporta- tion Access and Connectivity to Local Economic Outcomes: Statistical Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2297, pp. 154–163. American Automobile Association. 2012. Your Driving Costs. Heathrow, Fla. http://newsroom.aaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Your DrivingCosts2012.pdf. Accessed May 2013. Asensio, J., and A. Matas. 2008. Commuters’ Valuation of Travel Time Variability. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transporta- tion Review. Elsevier, Vol. 44, Issue 6, pp. 1074–1085. ATA Foundation and Cambridge Systematics. 1997. Incident Man- agement: Challenges, Strategies, and Solutions for Advancing Safety and Roadway Efficiency. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. www.itsbenefits .its.dot.gov/its/benecost.nsf/ID/19F4564DD66A22F6852569610051E 2E7?OpenDocument&Query=BMeasure. Bertini, R. L., S. Tantiyanugulchai, E. Anderson, R. Lindgren, and M. Leal. 2001. Evaluation of Region 2 Incident Response Program Using Archived Data. Report No. PSU-CE-TRG-01-01. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem. www.its.pdx.edu/pdf/IR_FinalReport.pdf. Bhat, C. R., and R. Sardesai. 2006. The Impact of Stop-Making and Travel Time Reliability on Commute Mode Choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 40, Issue 9, pp. 709–730. Black, I. G., and J. G. Towriss. 1993. Demand Effects of Travel Time Reliability. Final report. London Assessment Division, UK Depart- ment of Transport, London, United Kingdom. Bok, M., and F. V. Oort. 2011. Agglomeration Economies, Accessibility, and the Spatial Choice Behavior of Relocating Firms. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Volume 4, pp. 5–24. Booz Allen Hamilton. 1997. Executive Summary: 1996 Olympic and Para- lympic Games: Event Study. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/jpodocs/rept_ mis/3006.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2012. Börjesson, M., and J. Eliasson. 2008. Train Passengers’ Valuation of Travel Time Unreliability. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Leiden, Netherlands. Brownstone, D., and K. A. Small. 2005. Valuing Time and Reliability: Assessing the Evidence from Road Pricing Demonstrations. Trans- portation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 39, pp. 279–293. Cambridge Systematics. 2000. IDAS User’s Manual. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://idas. camsys.com/documentation.htm. Accessed May 21, 2012. Cambridge Systematics. 2003. IDAS User’s Manual, Appendix B, Tables B.2.14 to B.2.18. IDAS Version 2.3. http://idas.camsys.com/ documentation.htm. Accessed May 2013. Cambridge Systematics and ICF International. 2012. SHRP 2 Draft of Literature Review L17: Value of Travel Time Reliability: Synthesis Report and Workshop Working Paper. Unpublished report. Transpor- tation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/169243.aspx. Cambridge Systematics, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, University of Washington, Dowling Associates, Street Smarts, H. Levinson, and H. Rakha. 2013. SHRP 2 Report S2-L03-RR-1: Analytical Procedures for Determining the Impacts of Reliability Mitigation Strategies. Transpor- tation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics, Transmode Consultants, Asil Gezen, and ICF Kaiser Engineers, Inc., 1998. NCHRP Report 399: Multimodal Corri- dor and Capacity Analysis Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Carrion, C., and D. Levinson. 2010. Value of Reliability: High Occu- pancy Toll Lanes, General Purpose Lanes, and Arterials. Conference Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Transportation Net- work Reliability in Minneapolis, Minn. Chang, G.-L., and S. Rochon. 2007. Performance Evaluation and Benefit Analysis for CHART in Year 2007. Final report. 2007. http://chartin put.umd.edu/reports/chart2007final.pdf. Ciccone, A. 2002. Agglomeration Effects in Europe. European Economic Review, Vol. 46, Issue 2, pp. 213–227. De Jong, G., M. Kouwenhoven, E. Kroes, P. Rietveld, and P. Warffemius. 2009. Preliminary Monetary Values for the Reliability of Travel Times in Freight Transport. European Journal of Transport and Infra- structure Research, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 83–99. Dowling, R., W. Kittelson, and J. Zegeer. 1997. Report 387: Planning Tech- niques to Estimate Speeds and Service Volumes for Planning Applica- tions, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Drucker, J., and E. Feser. 2012. Regional Industrial Structure and Agglom- eration Economies: An Analysis of Productivity in Three Manufac- turing Industries, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 42, Issues 1–2, pp. 1–14. Economic Development Research Group. 2006. Economic Impact of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority and Related Projects. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Boston, Mass. References

83 Economic Development Research Group. 2013. NCHRP 02-24: Economic Productivity and Transportation Investment, Literature Review. Task 1 Literature Review, Stakeholder Perspectives and Framework Outline. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/ NCHRP02-24_Task1LitReview.pdf. Eddington, R. 2006. The Eddington Transport Study—The Case for Action: Sir Rod Eddington’s Advice to Government. Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office and Department for Transport, Norwich, United Kingdom. Elefteriadou, L., and X. Cui. 2007. Travel Time Reliability and Truck Level of Service on the Strategic Intermodal System: Part A—Travel Time Reliability. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Fla. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000. What Have We Learned About Intelligent Transportation Systems? http://ntl.bts.gov/ lib/jpodocs/repts_te/13316.pdf. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. 2005. HERS-ST Highway Economic Requirements System—State Version: Technical Report, Chapter 3. http://fhwa.dot.gov/asset/hersst/pubs/tech/tech03. cfm. Accessed May 2013. Fosgerau, M., K. Hjorth, C. Brems, and D. Fukuda. 2008. Travel Time Variability Definition and Valuation. Technical University of Den- mark, Transport Department, Lyngby, Denmark. Freight Analysis Framework. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Freight Management and Operations, 2007. http://www.ops .fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/index.htm. Ghosh, A. 2001. Valuing Time and Reliability: Commuters’ Mode Choice from a Real Time Congestion Pricing Experiment. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California at Irvine, Irvine, Calif. Graham, D. 2007. Agglomeration, Productivity and Transport Investment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 41, Part 3, pp. 317–343. Graham, D., and K. Van Dender. 2011. Estimating the Agglomeration Benefits of Transport Investments: Some Tests for Stability. Trans- portation, Vol. 38, Issue 3, pp. 409–426. Graham, D. J., S. Gibbons, and R. Martin. 2009. Transport Investment and the Distance Decay of Agglomeration Benefits. Imperial College London, for the UK Department for Transport. Gutiérrez, J. 2001. Location, Economic Potential and Daily Accessibil- ity: An Analysis of the Accessibility Impact of the High-Speed Line Madrid–Barcelona–French Border. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 9, Issue 4, pp. 229–242. Hall, R. 2000. Incident Dispatching, Clearance and Delay. Working paper UCB-ITS-PWP-2000-14. California PATH, University of California. www.path.berkeley.edu/PATH/Publications/PDF/PWP/ 2000/PWP-2000-14.pdf. Handy, S. L., and D. A. Niemeier. 1997. Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 1175–1194. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 1997. 1996 ITS Tour Report: Eastern North America and 1996 ITS World Congress: Volume 1. Jenkins, J., M. Colella, and F. Salvucci. 2011. Agglomeration Benefits and Transportation Projects: Review of Theory, Measurement, and Application. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 2221, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, pp. 104–111. Keeble D., J. Offord, and S. Walker. 1988. Peripheral Regions in a Com- munity of Twelve Member States, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Koskenoja, P. M. 1996. The Effect of Unreliable Commuting Time on Commuter Preferences. Working Paper No. qt5cq3632j, University of California Transportation Center. Li, Z., D. A. Hensher, and J. M. Rose. 2010. Willingness to Pay for Travel Time Reliability in Passenger Transport: A Review and Some New Empirical Evidence. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 46, Issue 3, pp. 384–403. Maas, G., M. Maggio, H. Shafie, and R. R. Stough. 2001. Incident Man- agement and Intelligent Transportation Systems Technology: Esti- mating Benefits for Northern Virginia. In Intelligent Transport Systems: Cases and Policies (R. R. Stough, ed.), Edward Elgar Pub- lishing, United Kingdom. Matsuo, M. 2008. Metropolitan Form, Transportation and Labor Access: Empirical Evidence from Four U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Doctoral Dissertation. Harvard University, Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, Mass. Melo, P., D. Graham, and R. Noland. 2009. A Meta-analysis of Esti- mates of Urban Agglomeration Elasticities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 39, Issue 3, pp. 332–342. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). May 2010. Improving Reliability on Surface Transportation Networks. Parsons Brinckerhoff, Northwestern University, Mark Bradley Research & Consulting, University of California at Irvine, Resource Systems Group, University of Texas at Austin, F. Koppelman, and Geostats. 2013. SHRP 2 Reports S2-C04-RW-1: Improving Our Understanding of How Highway Congestion and Pricing Affect Travel Demand. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C. Polenske, K. 2003. Clustering in Space Versus Dispersing Over Space: Agglomeration Versus Dispersal Economies. Uddevalla Symposium 2002 Innovation Entrepreneurship, Regional Development and Public Policy in the Emerging Digital Economy, University of Trollhättan/ Uddevalla, Research Report 04:01, pp. 393–411. Prud’homme, R., and C. Lee. 1999. Size, Sprawl, Speed and the Effi- ciency of Cities. Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No. 11, pp. 1849–1858. Quigley, J. M. 1998. Urban Diversity and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 127–138. Quigley, J. M. 2008. Urbanization, Agglomeration and Economic Development. Urbanization and Economic Growth. Edited by M. Spence, P. C. Annez, and R. M. Buckley. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the World Bank. Working Paper No. 19. RITA, U.S. Department of Transportation. 1997. Intelligent Transporta- tion Systems Joint Program: Benefit. www.itsbenefits.its.dot.gov/its/ benecost.nsf/0/0B37A6D584E620B2852569610051E268. Rosenthal, S. S., and W. C. Strange. 2003. Geography, Industrial Orga- nization, and Agglomeration. The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, Vol. 85, Issue 2, pp. 377–393. Schrank, D., B. Eisele, and T. Lomax. 2012. Appendix A: Methodology for the 2012 Urban Mobility Report. TTI’s 2012 Urban Mobility Report, Texas A&M Transportation Institute. Science Applications International Corporation and Cambridge Sys- tematics. 1994. Roadway Usage Patterns: Urban Case Studies, pre- pared for Volpe National Transportation Systems Center and the Federal Highway Administration. Senna, L. 1994. The Influence of Travel Time Variability on the Value of Time. Transportation, Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 203–228. SHRP 2 Project C03. http://www.trb.org/main/blurbs/166934.aspx. SHRP 2 Project C11. http://www.trb.org/main/blurbs/169524.aspx.

84 Skabardonis, A., H. Noeimi, K. Petty, D. Rydzewski, P. P. Varaiya, and H. Al-Deek. 1995. Freeway Service Patrol Evaluation. Research report UCB-ITS-PRR-95-5. California PATH, University of Cali- fornia. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/36r1t2m2. Small, K. A., and J. Yan. 2001. The Value of “Value Pricing” of Roads: Second-Best Pricing and Product Differentiation. Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, Vol. 49, Issue 2, pp. 310–336. Small, K. A., R. B. Noland, and P. Koskenoja. 1995. Socio-economic Attri- butes and Impacts of Travel Reliability: A Stated Preference Approach. California PATH Program, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley. Small, K. A., C. Winston, and J. Yan. 2005. Uncovering the Distribution of Motorists’ Preferences for Travel Time and Reliability. Economet- rica, Volume 73, Issue 4, pp. 1367–1382. Stogios, Y. C., H. Mahmassani, and P. Vovsha. Forthcoming. SHRP 2 Report S2-L04-RR-1: Incorporating Reliability Performance Measures in Operations and Planning Modeling Tools. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Stough, R. R. (ed.). 2001. Intelligent Transport Systems: Cases and Poli- cies. Edward Elgar Publishing, United Kingdom. Tilahun, N., and D. Levinson. 2009. Unexpected Delay and the Cost of Late- ness on I-394 High Occupancy/Toll Lanes. In Travel Demand Manage- ment and Road User Pricing: Success, Failure and Feasibility (W. Saleh and G. Sammer, eds.), Ashgate Publishing Limited, Burlington, Vt., pp. 173–184. Tilahun, N. Y., and D. M. Levinson. 2010. A Moment of Time: Reliabil- ity in Route Choice Using Stated Preference. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 179–187. Trego, T., and D. Murray. 2009. An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking. American Transportation Research Institute. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washing- ton, D.C. http://www.atri-online.org/research/results/ATRITRBOp Costs.pdf. Accessed May 2013. Turner, S., W. R. Stockton, S. James, T. Rother, and C. M. Walton. 1998. ITS Benefits: Review of Evaluation Methods and Reported Benefits. Report 1790-1. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin. http:// tti.tamu.edu/documents/1790-1.pdf. Ubbels, B., Y. Y. Tseng, and E. T. Verhoef. 2005. Value of Time, Schedule Delay and Reliability. Estimation Results of a Stated Choice Experiment Among Dutch Commuters Facing Conges- tion. European Regional Science Association Conference Papers, No. ersa05p202. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2011. The Value of Travel Time Sav- ings: Departmental Guidance for Conducting Economic Evaluations. Revision 2. September. http://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/ vot_guidance_092811c.pdf. Accessed May 2013. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2012. TIGER Grant Program: Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) Resource Guide. http://www.dot.gov/ sites/dot.dev/files/docs/tiger-12_bca-resourceGuide.pdf. Accessed May 2013. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2013. Guidance on Treatment of the Economic Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) in U.S. Department of Transportation Analyses. February. http://www.dot.gov/sites/dot. dev/files/docs/DOT%202013%20Signed%20VSL%20Memo.pdf. Accessed May 2013. Venables, A. J. 2007. Evaluating Urban Transport Improvements: Cost– Benefit Analysis in the Presence of Agglomeration and Income Taxation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 173–188. Vovsha, P., M. Bradley, and H. Mahmassani. 2011. Value of Travel Time Reliability: Synthesis of Estimation Approaches and Incorporation in Transportation Models. Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. Waters, W. 1992. The Value of Time Savings for the Economic Evaluation of Highway Investments in British Columbia. British Columbia Min- istry of Transportation and Highways, Vancouver, Canada. Weisbrod, G., J. Howard, M. Collins, and D. Vary. 2001a. Handbook for Assessing Economic Opportunities from Appalachian Development Highways. Appalachian Regional Commission, Washington, D.C. Weisbrod, G., D. Vary, and G. Treyz. 2001b. Economic Implications of Road Congestion. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report 463. Weisbrod, G., D. Vary, and G. Treyz. 2003. Measuring Economic Costs of Urban Traffic Congestion to Business. Transportation Research Record, No. 1839, pp. 98–106. Yan, J. 2002. Heterogeneity in Motorists’ Preferences for Time Travel and Time Reliability: Empirical Finding from Multiple Survey Data Sets and Its Policy Implications. University of California Transportation Center, Working Paper No. qt7nk0v3kj.

Next: Capacity Technical Coordinating Committee »
Development of Tools for Assessing Wider Economic Benefits of Transportation Get This Book
×
 Development of Tools for Assessing Wider Economic Benefits of Transportation
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) S2-C11-RW-1: Development of Tools for Assessing Wider Economic Benefits of Transportation describes spreadsheet-based tools designed to help calculate a transportation project's impact on travel time reliability, market access, and intermodal connectivity.

The report includes an accounting system designed to incorporate the three metrics into economic benefit and economic impact analyses.

Disclaimer: This software is offered as is, without warranty or promise of support of any kind either expressed or implied. Under no circumstance will the National Academy of Sciences or the Transportation Research Board (collectively "TRB") be liable for any loss or damage caused by the installation or operation of this product. TRB makes no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, in fact or in law, including without limitation, the warranty of merchantability or the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not in any case be liable for any consequential or special damages.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!