Practitioner’s Guide to the Integrated Ecological Framework (2013)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

88 1. Transportation for Communities—Advancing Projects through Partnerships (TCAPP). ICF International, Fairfax, Va. http://www.transportationforcommunities.com. Accessed Nov. 26, 2013. 2. Environmental Law Institute. 2007. Mitigation of Impacts to Fish and Wildlife Habitat: Estimating Costs and Identifying Opportunities. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C. 3. Gardner, R. C., J. Zedler, A. Redmond, R. E. Turner, C. A. Johnston, V. R. Alvarex, C. A. Ximenstad, K. Prestegaard, and W. J. Mitsch. 2009. Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act: Evaluating the Federal Compensatory Mitigation Regulation. Stetson Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 2; Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-24. 4. Brown, J. W. 2006. Eco-Logical: An Ecosystem Approach to Developing Infrastructure Projects. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.environment.fhwa.dot. gov/ecological/eco_index.asp. 5. Federal Highway Administration. Colorado Shortgrass Prairie Initiative MOA— Colorado DOT; Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife; the Nature Conservancy; FHWA; and USFWS. U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www. environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/comoa.asp. Accessed Feb. 17, 2014. 6. San Diego Association of Governments. 2008. TransNet Environmental Management Program MOA—San Diego Association of Governments, California Department of Fish and Game, Caltrans, and USFWS. SANDAG No. 50000879. http://www.sandag.org/ uploads/committeeid/committeeid_78_9098.pdf. 7. Bryson, E., R. Spagnolo, M. Hoffmann, and W. Seib. 2010. Achieving Ecosystem Health Using a Watershed Approach. National Wetlands Newsletter, Vol. 32, No. 3, p. 8. REFERENCES

89 PRACTITIONER’S GUIDE TO THE INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK REFERENCES 8. Jakubauskus, M., and B. Valdivia. 2011. REAP Water Resources Planner (WRP). Regional Economic Area Partnership of South Central Kansas, Water Resources Committee Agenda Packet, Wichita, Kan. http://www.reap-ks.org/images/content/files/31411WRC2. pdf. Accessed Oct. 23, 2013. 9. Mid-America Regional Council (MARC). 2008. Meeting handout, February. Kansas City, Mo. http://marc.org/transportation/agendas/Environment/feb08_workshop/ToolsData. pdf?&lang=en_us. Accessed Oct. 25, 2013. See also http://marc.org/Environment. 10. Groves, C. R. 2003. Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioner’s Guide to Plan- ning for Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 11. NatureServe. 2009. The NatureServe Vista 2.0 Process: A Guide to Soliciting Expert Input. Arlington, Va. http://www.natureserve.org/prodServices/vista/docs/expertInputGuide. pdf. 12. International Union for Conservation of Nature and the Conservation Measures Partner ship. 2010. Threats and Actions Taxonomies. http://www.conservationmeasures.org/ initiatives/threats-actions-taxonomies. Accessed Feb. 25, 2014. 13. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Compensa- tory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources: Final Rule. 33 CFR Parts 325 and 332; 40 CFR Part 230. Federal Register, Vol. 73, No. 70, pp. 19594–19765. 14. Mander, U., F. Müller, and T. Wrbka. 2005. Functional and Structural Landscape Indicators: Upscaling and Downscaling Problems. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 267–272. 15. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 16. Costanza, R., and C. Folke. 1997. Valuing Ecosystem Services with Efficiency, Fairness, and Sustainability as Goals. In Nature’s Services (G. C. Daily, ed.). Island Press, Washington, D.C. 17. Bean, M., R. Kihslinger, and J. Wilkinson. 2008. Design of U.S. Habitat Banking Sys- tems to Support the Conservation of Wildlife Habitat and At-Risk Species. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C. 18. Oregon Department of Transportation. 2008. Environmental Programmatic Permitting: Benefit/Cost Analysis. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem. 19. Carroll, N., J. Fox, and R. Bayon (eds.). 2008. Conservation and Biodiversity Bank- ing: A Guide to Setting Up and Running Biodiversity Credit Trading Systems. Earthscan, Sterling, Va. 20. BenDor, T. K., and M. W. Doyle. 2010. Planning for Ecosystem Service Markets. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 59–72. 21. Benedict, M. A., and E. T. McMahon. 2006. Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 22. Karr, J. R. 1981. Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities. Fisheries, Vol. 6, pp. 21–27. 23. Hughes, R. M., J. H. Gakstatter, M. A. Shirazi, and J. M. Omernik. 1982. An Approach for Determining Biological Integrity in Flowing Waters. In In-Place Resource Inventories: Principles and Practices, Proceedings of a National Workshop (Brann, T., L. O. House, and H. G. Lund, eds.). Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, Md.

90 PRACTITIONER’S GUIDE TO THE INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK 24. Mobrand, L. E., L. C. Lestelle, and L. Gilbertson. 1995. Grande Ronde Model Water- shed Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment: Template for Planning Status Report for Grande Ronde Model Watershed Project and Progress Report on the Application of an Ecosystem Analysis Method to the Grande Ronde Watershed Using Spring Chinook Salmon as a Diag- nostic Species. Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Portland, Ore. 25. Lestelle, L. C., L. E. Mobrand, J. A. Lichatowich, and T. S. Vogel. 1996. Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment (EDT) Applied Ecosystem Analysis: A Primer. Bonneville Power Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Portland, Ore. 26. VCS Association. 2008. Voluntary Carbon Standard: Guidance for Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Projects (VCS 2007.1). Washington, D.C. http://v-c-s.org/sites/v-c-s. org/files/Guidance%20for%20AFOLU%20Projects.pdf. 27. Groot, R. S. D. 1987. Environmental Functions as a Unifying Concept for Ecology and Economics. Environmentalist, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 105–109. 28. Boyd, J., and S. Banzhaf. 2007. What Are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standard- ized Environmental Accounting Units. Ecological Economics, Vol. 63, pp. 616–626. 29. Brown, T. C., J. C. Bergstrom, and J. B. Loomis. 2007. Defining, Valuing, and Providing Ecosystem Goods and Services. Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 329–376. 30. Limburg, K. E., R. V. O’Neill, R. Costanza, and S. Farber. 2002. Complex Systems and Valuation. Ecological Economics, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 409–420. 31. Farber, S. C., R. Costanza, and M. A. Wilson. 2002. Economic and Ecological Concepts for Valuing Ecosystem Services. Ecological Economics, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 375–392. 32. Ruhl, J. B., S. Kraft, and C. L. Lant. 2007. The Law and Policy of Ecosystem Services. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 33. Forest Trends and Ecosystem Marketplace. 2008. Payments for Ecosystem Services: Market Profiles. Program on Forests (PROFOR), Washington, D.C. 34. Redford, K. H., and W. M. Adams. 2009. Payment for Ecosystem Services and the Challenge of Saving Nature. Conservation Biology, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 785–787. 35. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1995. Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks. Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 228, pp. 58605–58614. http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/guidance/wetlands/ mitbankn.cfm. 36. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Guidance on Compensatory Mitigation Projects for Aquatic Resource Impacts Under the Corps Regulatory Program Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Regu- latory Guidance Letter No. 02-02. http://www.usace.army.mil/Portals/2/docs/civilworks/ RGLS/RGL2-02.pdf. 37. California Department of Transportation. 1990. MOA: Early Mitigation Planning for Transportation Improvements in California—Caltrans, FHWA, USACE, EPA, USFWS, and California Department of Fish and Game. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/cadiv/pre/moajoan.cfm. 38. Hirsch, A. 1988. Regulatory Context for Cumulative Impact Research. Environmental Management, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 715–723. 39. Liebesman, L. R., and P. T. Hundemann. 1992. Regulatory Standards for Permits Under Section 404. Natural Resources and Environment, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 12–14. 40. 23 CFR Section 771.109(b).

91 PRACTITIONER’S GUIDE TO THE INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK 41. Venner, M. 2004. DOT Environmental Commitment Tracking Systems. 42. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Compen- satory Mitigation Projects Involving the Restoration, Establishment, and/or Enhancement of Aquatic Resources. Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-03. http://www.usace.army.mil/ Portals/2/docs/civilworks/RGLS/rgl08_03.pdf. 43. Environmental Law Institute. 2002. Banks and Fees: The Status of Off-Site Wetland Mitigation in the United States. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C. http:// www.elistore.org/reports_detail.asp?ID=10695. Accessed Feb. 17, 2014. 44. Ossinger, M. 1999. Success Standards for Wetland Mitigation Projects: A Guideline. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia. 45. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2003. Policy for Evaluation of Conservation Efforts When Making Listing Decisions. 50 CFR Chapter IV. Federal Register, Vol. 68, No. 60, pp. 15100–15115. http://www.gpo.gov/ fdsys/pkg/FR-2003-03-28/pdf/FR-2003-03-28.pdf. 46. Section 4(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1533(a) (1)). 47. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Guidance for the Establishment, Use, and Opera- tion of Conservation Banks. http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/Conservation_ Banking_Guidance.pdf (68 FR 24753, May 8, 2003).