National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 8 - Conclusions
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22510.
×
Page 64
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22510.
×
Page 65
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22510.
×
Page 66

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

64 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Programmatic Agreement Library. Center for Environmental Excellence, AASHTO, Washington, D.C. http://environment .transportation.org/pal_database/. Accessed August 2013. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Programmatic Agreement Tool Kit. Center for Environmental Excellence, AASHTO, Washington, D.C. http://environment .transportation.org/documents/programmatic_agreement_toolkit/. Accessed August 2013. Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. State Wildlife Action Plans. http://www.wildlifeactionplan.org/state-wildlife-action-plans- swaps. Accessed August 2013. Austenfeld, F. Special Area Management Plan (SAMP) Upper Turkey Creek Watershed. http://www.watershedinstitute.biz/files/Turkey_ Creek_SAMP_INFORMATION_SHEET-_20072.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Bonoff, M. B., Z. O. Toledo, W. A. Ryan, and R. G. Carson. Oregon Department of Transportation’s OITA III State Bridge Delivery Pro- gram: 400 Bridges One Biological Opinion. 2005, p. 231. http:// www.icoet.net/ICOET_2005/proceedings/06IPCh6-227-244.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Brown, J. W. Eco-Logical: An Ecosystem Approach to Developing Infra- structure Projects. April 2006. http://www.environment.fhwa.dot .gov/ecological/eco_index.asp. Accessed August 2013. Brown, S. C., and P. L. M. Veneman. Effectiveness of Compensatory Wetland Mitigation in Massachusetts, USA. Wetlands, Vol. 21, 2001, pp. 508–518. Bryson, E. Watershed Resource Registry. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2010. http://www.trb.org/StrategicHighway ResearchProgram2SHRP2/Public/Pages/Toward_a_Common_ Ecological_Framework—Part%201_459.aspx. Accessed August 2013. Caltrans and Federal Highway Administration. Memorandum of Agreement: Early Mitigation Planning for Transportation Improve- ments in California. November 12, 2003. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ cadiv/pre/moajoan.cfm. Accessed August 2013. Colorado Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Colorado Department of Natural Resources, and The Nature Conservancy. Memorandum of Agreement. 2001. http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/ comoa.asp. Accessed August 2013. Council on Environmental Quality. Memorandum of Understanding to Foster the Ecosystem Approach. Washington, D.C., 1995. http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/policy/memoofun.htm. Accessed August 2013. Council on Environmental Quality. Appropriate Use of Mitigation and Monitoring and Clarifying the Appropriate Use of Mitigated Find- ings of No Significant Impact. White House Council on Environ- mental Quality Issues Mitigation and Monitoring Guidance Under NEPA. January 2011. ceq.hss.doe.gov/current_developments/docs/ Mitigation_and_Monitoring_Guidance_14Jan2011. Ecosystem Marketplace. SpeciesBanking.com. http://www.speciesbanking .com/index.php. Accessed August 2013. Environmental Banc and Exchange. The Carolina Heelsplitter Conser- vation Bank. 2009. http://www.ebxusa.com/work/ebx-endangered- species-habitat-conservation-banks/. Accessed October 1, 2013. Environmental Law Institute. State Wetland Protection: Status, Trends and Model Approaches: A 50-State Study. Washington, D.C., 2008. Environmental Law Institute. The Status and Character of In-Lieu Fee Mitigation in the United States. Washington, D.C., 2006. Environmental Law Institute. Watershed Initiatives and Decision Support Tools. National Symposium on Compensatory Mitigation and the Watershed Approach, Washington, D.C., May 2004. http://www.eli.org/ pdf/wsSymposium/WatershedInitiatives.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Federal Highway Administration. Case Studies: California Riverside County Integrated Project. http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/integ/ case_riverside.asp. Accessed August 2013. Federal Highway Administration. ESA-FHWA Webtool Brief Sheet. November 2009. http://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/esawebtool/ Documents/Corrected%20ESA-FHWA%20Webtool%20 Two-Pager.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Federal Highway Administration. Information: Federal-Aid Eligibility of Wetland and Natural Habitat Mitigation. Memorandum. U.S. Department of Transportation, March 10, 2005. http://www .environment.transportation.org/documents/mitigation_guidance .doc. Accessed August 2013. Federal Highway Administration. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Federal Guidance on the Use of the TEA-21 Preference for Mitigation Banking to Fulfill Mitigation Requirements Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. 2003. http:// water.epa.gov/lawsregs/guidance/wetlands/upload/2003_07_11_ wetlands_TEA-21Guidance.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Federal Highway Administration. Guidance Memorandum on Manage- ment of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Environmental Analysis and Consultation Process. 2002. http://environment. fhwa.dot.gov. Accessed April 2014. Field, J. Central Coast Quake Rocks Breakwater. 192 San Diego Creek SAMP. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, Calif., April 2004. References

65 Gordon, E., O. Franco, and M. Tyrrell (eds.). Protecting Biodiversity: A Guide to Criteria Used by Global Conservation Organizations. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Conn., 2005. http://environment.research.yale.edu/ documents/downloads/o-u/report_6_protecting_biodiversity.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2013. Hadley, N., A. Hollis, L. Coen, and W. Anderson. Murrells Inlet Special Area Management Plan. October 2005. http://www.scdhec.gov/ environment/ocrm/docs/oysters_recycle.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Harrelson, D. Questions and Answers About Recovery Credit Systems for Listed Species. Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., 2008. http://www.fws.gov/endangered/ landowners/presentation-script.html. Accessed September 12, 2013. Haufler, J. B., R. K. Baydack, H. Campa III, B. J. Kernohan, C. Miller, L. J. O’Neil, and L. Waits. Performance Measures for Ecosystem Manage- ment and Ecological Sustainability. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Md., 2002. http://wildlife.org/documents/technical-reviews/docs/ PerformanceMeasures02-1.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Howie, S., S. Cox, and S. Schaftlein. The Integrated Ecological Frame- work: A Step-by-Step Approach for Integrating Transportation and Conservation Planning for Improved Outcomes. TR News, No. 289, November–December 2013. Illinois Department of Transportation. Illinois Wetland Mitigation Banks. http://www.dot.state.il.us/desenv/environmental/wetlandoption .html. Accessed August 2013. Inghram, B. J. Species Conservation in Idaho: Going Beyond the ESA. Proc., 2005 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation (C. L. Irwin, P. Garrett, and K. P. McDermott, eds.), Center for Transportation and the Environment, North Carolina State Univer- sity, Raleigh, 2005, p. 243. Johnson, P., D. L. Mock, A. McMillan, L. Driscoll, and T. Hruby. Wash- ington State Wetland Mitigation Evaluation Study, Phase 2: Evaluating Success. Publication No. 02-06-009. Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Lacey, 2002. Kihslinger, R. Success of Wetland Mitigation Projects. National Wetlands Newsletter, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2008, pp. 14–16. Mack, J. J., and M. Micacchion. An Ecological Assessment of Ohio Mitigation Banks: Vegetation, Amphibians, Hydrology, and Soils. Ohio EPA Techni- cal Report WET/2006-1. Wetland Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Columbus, 2006. Marsh Area Regional Coalition and Ohio Coastal Management Program. Mentor Marsh Area Special Area Management Plan (SAMP). June 2004. http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/Portals/13/partners/mentorplan .pdf. Accessed August 2013. Maryland Watershed Resources Registry. http://watershedresources registry.com/overview.html. Accessed August 2013. Mehl, C., and J. Haufler. Summary of Conservation Planning Efforts in Forested Regions of the United States. Ecosystem Management Research Institute, National Council for Air and Stream Improve- ment, Clemson, S.C., March 2008. National Academy of Sciences. Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2001. National Marine Fisheries Service. Interim Endangered and Threatened Species Recovery Planning Guidance, Version 1.2. Original October 2004; updated September 2007. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. A Nationwide Survey of Conservation Banks. Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Seattle, Wash., 2003. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh. http://portal.ncdenr .org/web/eep. Accessed August 2013. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Million Acre Initiative. Raleigh. http://www.conservation.nc.gov/ web/cpca/million-acre-initiative. Accessed April 2014. North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program. Guide to the North Caro- lina Wetland Restoration Program’s Watershed Restoration Strategy. Raleigh, 2001. http://www.nceep.net/services/restplans/Planning %20Guide.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Noss, R. F., E. T. LaRoe III, and J. M. Scott. Appendix C. In Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradations. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va., 1995. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Guide to Developing Local Water- shed Plans. Division of Water, Ohio EPA, Columbus, 1997. http://www .epa.ohio.gov/portals/35/nps/wsguide.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Surface Water Enhancement, Restoration, and Protection (SWERP) Clearinghouse. Columbus. http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/swerp/index.aspx. Accessed August 2013. Oklahoma Conservation Commission. Wetlands Program. http://www .ok.gov/conservation/Agency_Divisions/Water_Quality_Division/ Wetlands_Program/Wetlands_Registry.html. Accessed August 2013. Oregon Department of Transportation. Environmental Programmatic Permitting Benefit/Cost Analysis. OTIA III State Bridge Delivery Pro- gram, Salem, October 2008. http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/ OTIA/pages/otia3_introduction.aspx. Accessed September 12, 2013. Oregon Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administra- tion, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Comprehensive Mitigation/ Conservation Strategy (CMCS). 2005. http://www.obdp.org/ partner/environmental/mitigation/. Accessed September 12, 2013. Partnership for Cooperative Conservation. Memorandum of Under- standing. January 2009. http://corpslakes.usace.army.mil/employees/ cecwon/pdfs/mou/09-CooperativeConservation.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2013. Peck, A. J., M. Wine, C. Liller, R. Looney, and J. Harris. Use of Habitat Credit Trading As a Mitigation Tool for Transportation Projects: A Federal Highway Administration Pilot Project in Arkansas. Proc., International Conference on Ecology and Transportation, Duluth, Minn., 2009. http:// www.icoet.net/ICOET_2009/downloads/proceedings/ICOET2009- Proceedings-Complete.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2013. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Rivers Conservation Program. http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/brc/ conservation/rivers/riverresourceprogram/riversconservation/ index.htm. Accessed August 2013. Reed, F. N., E. T. LaRoe III, and J. M. Scott. Appendix C. In Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradations, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 1995 [Online] http://biology.usgs.gov/pubs/ecosys.htm. Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council. Rhode Island’s Salt Pond Region: A Special Area Management Plan. Wakefield, 1999. http://www.crmc.state.ri.us/regulations/SAMP_SaltPond.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Riverside County Integrated Project. http://www.rcip.org/Documents/ RCIP%20overview_REV.pdf. Accessed August 2013. http://environ ment.fhwa.dot.gov/integ/case_riverside.asp. Accessed September 28, 2013. San Diego Association of Governments. TransNet. http://www.sandag .org/index.asp?classid=30&fuseaction=home.classhome. Accessed August 2013. Schueler, T., and A. Kitchell. Urban Subwatershed Restoration Manual No. 2: Methods to Develop Restoration Plans for Small Urban Watersheds. Ver- sion 2.0. Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, Md., 2005. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. The Beaufort SAMP: A Special Area Management Plan to Protect

66 the Waterways of Beaufort County. Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, Columbia, September 2000. http://www .scdhec.gov/environment/ocrm/docs/SAMP/BFTS/bsamp.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2013. Southeast Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission. Advanced Iden- tification of Wetland Disposal Areas. Waukesha. http://www.sewrpc .org/SEWRPC/NaturalResources/AdvancedIdentificationofWetland .htm. Accessed August 2013. State of Delaware. Special Area Management Plan: A Plan for the Revi- talization of South Wilmington. http://www.dnrec.delaware.gov/ coastal/Pages/WilmingtonSAMP.aspx. Accessed August 2013. Stokstad, E. Heinz Center Wants Feds to Build Ecosystem Indicator Partnership. Science, Vol. 320, No. 5883, June 20, 2008, p. 1575. The Conservation Registry. www.conservationregistry.org. Accessed August 2013. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Kane County, Illinois Advanced Identifica- tion of Wetlands. http://www.lrc.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/ Illinois/ADIDMaps/KaneCounty.aspx. Accessed August 2013. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Regional General Permit SAJ-92, Florida Department of Transportation and Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise. August 2008. http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Portals/44/docs/ regulatory/sourcebook/permitting/general_permits/RGP/ gen_SAJ-92_20080925.pdf. Accessed August 2013. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Regulatory Program: Orange County Special Area Management Plan. http://www.spl.usace.army.mil/ Media/FactSheets/tabid/1321/Article/2925/regulatory-program .aspx. Accessed August 2013. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources; Final Rule. Federal Register, Vol. 73, No. 70, 2008, pp. 19594–19705. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Wildland Urban Interface Fuel Treat- ment Biological Assessment and Evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, N.Mex., 2001. http://www .fs.fed.us/r3/fam/wui/index.shtml. Accessed August 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters. EPA 841-B-08- 002. Washington, D.C., 2008. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Healthy Watersheds. http://water .epa.gov/polwaste/nps/watershed/index.cfm. Accessed August 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitiga- tion Banks. Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 228, 1995, pp. 58605–58614. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Evaluating the Net Benefit of Hazardous Fuels Treatment Projects. December 10, 2002. http://www.fws.gov/ endangered/esa-library/pdf/healthy_forest.pdf. Accessed August 2013. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Guidance for the Establishment, Use, and Operation of Conservation Banks. Federal Register, Vol. 68, No. 89, 2003, p. 24753. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. NiSource Habitat Conservation Plan. http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/permits/hcp/nisource/ index.html. Accessed January 2011. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Working Interim Guidance for Program- matic Section 7 Consultations. 2003. http://www.fws.gov/endangered/ esa-library/pdf/pages7-18.pdf. Accessed August 2013. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Federal Highway Administration. Department of Transportation Programmatic Consultation Guidance. 2000. http://www.fws.gov/endangered/what-we-do/consultation- stories.html. Accessed August 2013. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service. Announcement of Final Policy for Candidate Conservation Agree- ments with Assurances. Federal Register, Vol. 64, No. 116, 1999, pp. 32726–32736. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service. Endangered Species Consultation Handbook: Procedures for Conduct- ing Consultation and Conference Activities Under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. March 1998. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Interim Recovery Planning Guidance. October 2004. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services. Endangered Species USFWS, NiSource HCP. http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/permits/hcp/ nisource/index.html. Accessed January 1, 2011. U.S. Forest Service. Conservation and Land Management Environ- mental Services Board Charter. December 2008. http://www.fs .fed.us/ecosystemservices/pdf/farmbill/ESB_Charter.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2013. U.S. Government Accounting Office. Managing for Results: EPA Faces Challenges in Developing Results-Oriented Performance Goals and Measures. GAO/RCED-00-77. April 2000. http://www.gao.gov/ assets/240/230262.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2013. Venner, M., M. DeWit, and C. Paulsen. Asset Management of Environ- mental Mitigation Features. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C., June 2009. Venner, M., and C. Paulsen. Compendium of Best Practices for Incorpo- rating Environmental Commitments into Transportation Construc- tion and Maintenance Contract Documents. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C., June 2009. Waldner, D. Streamlining ESA and USACE Processes. Presentation. http:// www.cte.ncsu.edu/cte/EEConference/sessions/documents/21-3_ Waldner.pdf. Accessed August 2013. Washington State Department of Transportation. I-405, Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank. June 2009. http:// www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/I405/Springbrook/default.htm. Accessed August 2013. Washington State Department of Transportation. Statewide Assessment: Best Practices of Incorporating Environmental Commitments into Con- tracts. Final report. WSDOT Headquarters Construction and Envi- ronmental Services Offices, Olympia, May 27, 2008. http://www .wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/699DB756-0A34-4CE6-9409- 6EA82BB84B15/0/BestPractices.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2013. Willamette Partnership. Discussion Draft: A Framework for Integrating Market Assurances. Counting on the Environment, Willamette Part- nership, Portland, Ore., April 3, 2009. http://willamettepartnership .org/. Accessed August 2013.

Next: Capacity Technical Coordinating Committee »
An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 1 Get This Book
×
 An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 1
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) S2-C06-RW-1: An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 1 summarizes the research approach and major findings of a project designed to help transportation and environmental professionals apply ecological principles early in the planning and programming process of highway capacity improvements to inform later environmental reviews and permitting.

The report is part one of a four-volume set. The other volumes in the set are:

A supplemental report, Integrated Ecological Framework Outreach Project, documents the techniques used to disseminate the project's results into practitioner communities and provides technical assistance and guidance to those agencies piloting the products.

The primary product of these complementary efforts is the Integrated Ecological Framework (IEF). The IEF is a step-by-step process guiding the integration of transportation and ecological planning. Each step of the IEF is supported by a database of case studies, data, methods, and tools. The IEF is available through the Transportation for Communities—Advancing Projects through Partnerships (TCAPP) website. TCAPP is now known as PlanWorks.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!