Energy Savings Strategies for Transit Agencies (2013)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

57 REFERENCES 1. Davis, S.D., S.W. Diegel, and R.G. Boundy, “Chap- ter 2—Energy,” In Transportation Energy Data Book, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 2-1–2-19. 2. Greening Mass Transit & Metro Regions: The Final Report of the Blue Ribbon Commission on Sustainabil- ity and the MTA, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.mta. info/sustainability/pdf/SustRptFinal.pdf. 3. Energy Conservation and Management Plan, Los Ange- les County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, Calif., Sep. 2011. 4. Moving Towards Sustainability: 2011 Metro Sustainability Report, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2011. 5. Renewable Energy Task Report, The MTA Blue Ribbon Commission on Sustainability, New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Oct. 29, 2008. 6. 2011 Public Transportation Fact Book, American Public Transportation Association, Washington, D.C., Apr. 2011. 7. “Gasoline Gallon Equivalent Definition,” Alternative Fuels Data Center, U.S. Department of Energy, Washing- ton, D.C. [Online]. Available: https://www.afdc.energy. gov/afdc/prep/popups/gges.html [accessed May 7, 2012]. 8. “Commercial Sector Energy Consumption,” Buildings Energy Data Book, U.S. Department of Energy, Wash- ington, D.C., 2010 [Online]. Available: http://buildings databook.eren.doe.gov/default.aspx. 9. Hodges, T., Public Transportation’s Role in Responding to Climate Change, Federal Transit Administration, Wash- ington, D.C., Jan. 2010, 16 pp. [Online]. Available: http:// www.fta.dot.gov/documents/PublicTransportations RoleInRespondingToClimateChange2010.pdf. 10. “Average Fuel Efficiency of U.S. Light Duty Vehicles,” Table 4-23, National Transportation Statistics, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington, D.C., 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.bts.gov/publications/ national_transportation_statistics/html/table_04_23. html [accessed Mar. 14, 2012]. 11. Sound Transit Sustainability Plan, Sound Transit, Seat- tle, Wash., June 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www. soundtransit.org/Documents/pdf/about/environment/ SustainabilityPlan.pdf. 12. “Basic Elements of an EMS,” Center for Organizational and Technological Advancement, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg [Online]. Available: http://www.cota.vt.edu/ems/what_is_ems/ basic_elements.html [accessed Mar. 7, 2012]. 13. “EMS Management Review,” Utah Transit Authority, Salt Lake City, June 14, 2011. 14. Draft Sustainable Return on Investment (SROI) Analysis for SamTrans: An Assessment of Building and Trans- portation Strategies, San Mateo County Transit District, Nov. 2010. 15. BASE Energy, Inc., Energy Efficiency Assessment of Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Train Cars, BASE- PGE-05-09, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, San Francisco, Calif., 2007. 16. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cost Effectiveness Study, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, June 2010. 17. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.fta.dot.gov/about/12350. html [accessed Mar. 8, 2012]. 18. “TIGER Grants,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.dot. gov/tiger/index.html [accessed Mar. 12, 2012]. 19. “Energy Programs,” Connecticut Energy Efficiency Fund, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://ctsavesenergy.org/ programs/business.php [accessed Mar. 12, 2012]. 20. Hikichi, L.K. and E. Beimborn, Innovation at Transit Systems, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washing- ton, D.C., Oct. 2005. 21. “$100 Million in Obama Administration Economic Recovery Act Funds Charts New Course for Green Transportation,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Sep. 21, 2009. 22. “Green Construction Policy,” Executive Management and Audit Committee, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, July 21, 2011. 23. “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Effi- ciency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 179, Sep. 15, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.nhtsa.gov/fuel- economy. 24. Melendez, M., J. Taylor, J. Zuboy, W.S. Wayne, and D. Smith, Emission Testing of Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) Natural Gas and Diesel Transit Buses, NREL/TP-540-36355, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colo., Dec. 2005. 25. Lowell, D., W. Parsley, C. Bush, and D. Zupo, “Compar- ison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses,” Ninth Diesel Engine Emissions Reduction (DEER) Workshop, Aug. 24–28, Newport, R.I., Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, Wash- ington, D.C., 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.osti. gov/bridge/servlets/purl/829622-k8LC2V/native/. 26. “Natural Gas Buses: Separating Myth from Fact,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., May 2000. 27. Ochoa, M.C., “New York City Fleet Upgrades: Conven- tional Diesel, Hybrid, or CNG? In Media Res Cost-Benefit Analysis,” 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Compendium of Papers, Jan. 2008.

58 28. “GreenRoad Features,” GreenRoad [Online]. Avail- able: http://greenroad.com/tour/features/ [accessed May 8, 2012]. 29. Proc, K., et al., “100,000-Mile Evaluation of Transit Buses Operated on Biodiesel Blends (B20),” presented at the Powertrain and Fluid Systems Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 2006, Toronto, ON, Canada. 30. Clark, N.N., et al., TCRP Report 132: Assessment of Hybrid-Electric Transit Bus Technology, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washing- ton, D.C., 2009 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs. trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_132.pdf. 31. Transportation’s Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Volume 1: Synthesis Report, Report to Congress of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Apr. 2010. 32. Chandler, K. and K. Walkowicz, King County Metro Transit Hybrid Articulated Buses: Final Evaluation Results, Technical Report NREL/TP-540-40585, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colo., Dec. 2006. 33. Reich, S.L. and S. Kolpakov, Tracking Costs of Alter- natively Fueled Buses in Florida, National Center for Transit Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, Nov. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.nctr.usf.edu/ wp-content/uploads/2012/02/77927-final-report.pdf. 34. Polzin, S., S. Reich, and J. Davis, Exploration of Transit’s Sustainability Competitiveness, National Center for Tran- sit Research and Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Mar. 2011. 35. Lammert, M., Long Beach Transit: Two-Year Evalua- tion of Gasoline-Electric Hybrid Transit Buses, Techni- cal Report NREL/TP-540-42226, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Goldon, Colo., June 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/42226.pdf. 36. McGraw, J., S. Shull, and G. Mikhaitis, The Route to Car- bon and Energy Savings: Transit Efficiency in 2030 and 2050, Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago, Ill. and San Francisco, Calif., Nov. 2010. 37. Barnitt, R., Case Study: Ebus Hybrid Electric Buses and Trolleys, Technical Report NREL/TP-540-38749, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colo., July 2006. 38. Mitchell, A., “Hydrogen Bus Fleet Improving, BC Transit President Says,” Pique, May 27, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.piquenewsmagazine.com/gyrobase/ hydrogen-bus-fleet-improving-bc-transit-president-says/ Content?oid=2174878&showFullText=true [accessed Aug. 17, 2012]. 39. Eudy, L., K. Chandler, and C. Gikakis, Fuel Cell Buses in U.S. Transit Fleets: Current Status 2010, NREL/ TP-5600-49379, National Renewable Energy Labora- tory, Golden, Colo., Nov. 2010. 40. Chandler, K. and L. Eudy, Connecticut Transit (CT Transit) Fuel Cell Transit Bus: Third Evaluation Report, NREL/TP-560-47334-1, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colo., Jan. 2010. 41. Chandler, K. and L. Eudy, Zero Emission Bay Area (ZEBA) Fuel Cell Bus Demonstration: First Results Report, NREL/ TP-5600-52015, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colo., Aug. 2011, 44 pp. 42. “Leading by Example,” Maryland Department of Trans- portation, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.mdot. maryland.gov/Office%20of%20Planning%20and%20 Capital%20Programming/Smart%20Green%20 and%20Growing/LeadingByExample.html [accessed Mar. 15, 2012]. 43. Southworth, F., M.D. Meyer, and B.A. Weigel, Transit Greenhouse Gas Emissions Management Compendium, FTA-GA-26-7006.2011.01, Federal Transit Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C., Jan. 12, 2011. 44. Greening and Energy Strategies for the Canadian Public Transit Industry: Industry Research and Trends Report— Draft, Canadian Urban Transportation Association, Toronto, ON, Mar. 16, 2012 45. “Transit Rail: Potential Rail Car Cost-Saving Strategies Exist,” GAO-10-730, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, D.C., June 2010. 46. “SEP-TAINABLE: Going Beyond Green,” Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pa., Feb. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.septa.org/ sustain/pdf/septainable12.pdf [accessed Feb. 20, 2012]. 47. Traction Power Report, Blue Ribbon Commission on Sus- tainability for the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York, Feb. 25, 2009. 48. “Board Action/Information Summary: Sustainability Ini- tiatives,” Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Author- ity, Washington, D.C., Mar. 8, 2012. 49. Grant, M. and F. Gallivan, TCRP Synthesis 84: Current Practices in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Savings from Transit, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, 77 pp. 50. Transit Sustainability Guidelines, APTA SUDS-UD- RP-004-11, American Public Transportation Association, Washington, D.C., Mar. 31, 2011. 51. Ziring, E. and P.S. Srirag, “Mitigating Excessive Idling of Transit Buses,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2143, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 142–149. 52. “Clean Air Act Settlement with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company (MBCR) for Com- muter Train Idling Violations,” U.S. Environmental Pro- tection Agency, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/region1/enforcement/ air/pdfs/CAA-MBTA-MBCR-Fact-Sheet.pdf. 53. “Fuel Sense: Making Fleet and Transit Operations More Efficient,” Case Studies in Sustainable Transportation, Transport Canada, Toronto, ON, July 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/programs/environment- utsp-fuelsense-1166.htm. 54. Hemily, B. and R. King, TCRP Synthesis 41: The Use of Small Buses in Transit Service, Transportation Research

59 Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, 71 pp. 55. Lehtonen, M. and R. Kulmala, “Benefits of Pilot Imple - mentation of Public Transport Signal Priorities and Real- Time Passenger Information,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1799, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 18–25. 56. “Hybrids, Diesels, and Alternative Fuel Vehicles,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., Mar. 28, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ alternatives.shtml. 57. “Dial Down Rising Fuel Costs,” Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www. fueleconomy.gov/feg/tiplist.shtml [accessed Mar. 19, 2012]. 58. “Lighting,” Energy Star Building Upgrade Manual, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm? cbusiness.bus_upgrade_manual [accessed Mar. 18, 2012]. 59. “New York City Transit and the Environment,” Metro- politan Transit Authority, New York, n.d. [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.mta.info/nyct/facts/ffenvironment.htm [accessed Mar. 15, 2012]. 60. Capital District Transportation Authority, Solar Tran- sit Stops on Central Avenue: Final Report, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Feb. 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.dot.ny.gov/ divisions/engineering/technical-services/trans-r-and-d- repository/C-08-04%20CDTA%20Solar%20Transit%20 Stop%20Final%20Report_Feb%202011.pdf?ndnysdot [accessed Nov. 23, 2011]. 61. Report to Congress: Transit Green Building Action Plan, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., July 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.fta.dot.gov/ documents/Transit_Green_Building_Action_Plan.pdf. [accessed Mar. 19, 2012]. 62. Eudy, L., R. Burgess, and C. Ainscough, Transit Investments for Greenhouse Gas and Energy Reduction Program: First Assessment Report, Federal Transit Administration, Wash- ington, D.C., Apr. 2012. 63. Water Sustainability Report, The MTA Blue Ribbon Com- mission on Sustainability, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York, Dec. 24, 2008. 64. 2008–2009 Sustainability Report, Regional Transit Dis- trict, Denver, Colo., Nov. 29, 2010. 65. Lowell, D., TCRP Synthesis 9: Waste Control Practices at Bus Maintenance Facilities, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, 26 pp. 66. Renewable Energy Policy, Los Angeles County Metro- politan Transportation Authority, Sep. 14, 2011. 67. “MARTA’s Sustainability Programs,” Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority [Online]. Available: http://www.itsmarta.com/marta-sustainability-programs. aspx#canopies [accessed Feb. 9, 2012]. 68. Smith, D.A., “Selection of Provider for Solar Purchase Power Agreement,” Board Memorandum to Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors, Jan. 24, 2011. 69. “CityBus, Lafayette–West Lafayette, IN,” Northern Power Systems [Online]. Available: http://northernpower. kiosk-view.com/citybus [accessed June 13, 2012]. 70. “Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Transit,” APTA SUDS-CC-RP-001-09, American Public Trans- portation Association, Washington, D.C., Aug., 2009. 71. “Connecticut Transit Hybrid Bus and Stationary Fuel Cell Installation,” TIGGER-FS-CT-77-001, U.S. Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., July 2011. 72. Eudy, L., et al., “Transit Investments for Greenhouse Gas and Energy Reduction Program: First Assessment Report” [Draft]. 73. Sep-tainable: The Route to Regional Sustainability, South- eastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadel- phia, Jan. 2011. 74. “About Metro,” King County Metro Transit [Online]. Available: http://metro.kingcounty.gov/am/metro.html [accessed May 8, 2012]. 75. King County Energy Plan, King County Energy Task Force, Seattle, Wash., Oct. 2010. 76. An ordinance requiring the King County executive to develop a strategic climate action plan by June 29, 2012; amending Ordinance 17166, Section 2, and K.C.C. 18.50.010 and adding a new chapter to K.C.C. Title 18, King County Legislature Enactment #17270, Feb. 27,2012 [Online]. Available: http://mkcclegisearch.kingcounty.gov/ View.ashx?MF&ID1822458&GUID342CADEC-671B- 47EF-A4B3-6C08DE8431C8 [accessed June 13, 2012].