National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 6 - Summary and Suggested Research
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Evaluating Pavement Strategies and Barriers for Noise Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22541.
×
Page 60
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Evaluating Pavement Strategies and Barriers for Noise Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22541.
×
Page 61
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Evaluating Pavement Strategies and Barriers for Noise Mitigation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22541.
×
Page 62

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

60 1. Donavan, P., and Rymer, B., Assessment of Highway Pavements for Tire/Road Noise Generation, Society of Automotive Engineers Noise and Vibration Conference Proceedings, Traverse City, Mich., May 2003. 2. Donavan, P., and Rymer, B., Quantification of Tire/Pavement Noise: Application of the Sound Intensity Method, Proceedings of INTER-NOISE 2004, Prague, Czech Republic, August 2004. 3. Donavan, P., and Lodico, D., NCHRP Report 630: Measuring Tire- Pavement Noise at the Source, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009. 4. Standard Methods of Test for Measurement of Tire/Pavement Noise Using the On-Board Sound Intensity (OBSI) Method, TP 76-12, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offi- cials, Washington, D.C., May 2012. 5. Donavan, P., Reyff, J., and Scofield, L., Reduction of Traffic and Tire/Pavement Noise: Initial Results of the Arizona Quiet Pavement Program, Proceedings of INTER-NOISE 2005, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 2005. 6. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Admin- istration, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23: Highways, Part 772–Procedures for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise and Con- struction Noise, June 13, 2010 (revised January 2011). http://www. gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-07-13/pdf/2010-15848.pdf. 7. Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and Guidance, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administra- tion, Office of Environmental and Planning, Noise and Air Quality Branch, Washington, D.C., June 1995. 8. Highway Traffic Noise: Analysis and Abatement Guidance, U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environmental and Planning, Noise and Air Quality Branch, Wash- ington, D.C., June 2010 (Revised January 2011). 9. National Academy of Engineering. Technology for a Quieter Amer- ica, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2010. 10. Fleming, G., Rapoza, A., and Lee, C., Development of National Refer- ence Energy Mean Emission Levels for the FHWA Traffic Noise Model (FHWA TNM®), Report No. DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-96-2, U.S. Department of Transportation, Volpe National Transportation Sys- tems Center, Version 1.0, 1996. 11. Rochat, J., Hastings, A., Read, D., and Lau, M., FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM) Pavement Effects Implementation Study: Progress Report 1, Report Nos. FHWA HEP-12-034 and DOT-VNTSC- FHWA-12-01, U.S. Department of Transportation, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, January 2012. 12. Rochat, J., Hastings, A., and Ferroni, M., Investigating the Implemen- tation of Pavement Effects via OBSI Data in the FHWA Traffic Noise Model (FHWA TNM®), Proceedings of Noise-Con 2007, Reno, Nev., October 2007. 13. Donavan, P., and Lodico, D., Measuring Tire-Pavement Noise at the Source: Precision and Bias, Draft Final Report, NCHRP Proj- ect 1-44(1), Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., Petaluma, Calif., July 14, 2011. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/nchrp01- 44(01)_FR.pdf. 14. Walls III, J., and Smith, M., Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design, Publication No. FHWA–SA-98-079, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., September 1998. http://isddc.dot.gov/OLPFiles/FHWA/013017.pdf. 15. Hallin, J. P., Sadasivam, S., Mallela, J., Hein, D. K., Darter, M. I., and Von Quintus, H. L., NCHRP Report 703: Guide for Pavement-Type Selection, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011. 16. Standard Method of Test for Determining the Influence of Road Surfaces on Vehicle Noise Using the Continuous-Flow Traffic Time- Integrated Method (CTIM), TP 99-11, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., May 2011. 17. Standard Method of Test for Determining the Influence of Road Sur- faces on Vehicle Noise Using the Statistical Isolated Pass-By Method (SIP), TP 98-11, American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., May 2012. 18. Donavan, P., Reyff, J., and Pommerenck, A., Progress Report 3: Quiet Pavement Pilot Program, Report 577, prepared for Arizona Depart- ment of Transportation, Arizona Transportation Research Cen- ter, Phoenix, Ariz., September 2012. www.azdot.gov/TPD/ATRC/ publications/project_reports/PDF/AZ577.pdf. 19. Rassmussen, R., Mun, E., Ferragut, T., and Wiegand, P., A Compre- hensive Field Study on Concrete Pavement Solutions for Reducing Tire-Pavement Noise, Proceedings of INTER-NOISE 2006, Honolulu, Hawaii, December 2006. 20. Thornton, W., Bernard, R., Hanson, D., and Scofield, L., Acoustical Variability of Existing Pavements, Proceedings of Noise-Con 2004, Baltimore, Md., July 2004. 21. Donavan, P., and Rymer, B., Applications of Asphalt Rubber Pave- ments in American Southwest States, Proceedings of INTER-NOISE 2010, Lisbon, Portugal, June 2010. 22. Donavan, P., Reducing Traffic Noise with Quieter Pavements, Pro- ceedings of Noise-Con 2005, Minneapolis, Minn., October 2005. 23. Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., I-80 Davis OGAC Pavement Noise Study: Traffic Noise Levels Associated with Aging Open Grade Asphalt Con- crete Overlay, California Department of Transportation, Division of References

61 Environmental Analysis, Sacramento, Calif., May 2011. http://www. dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/pub/Davis_12Yr_QPR_Study_May11.pdf. 24. Donavan, P., Use of the ASTM Standard Reference Test Tire as a Benchmark for On-Board Tire/Pavement Noise Measurement, Society of Automotive Engineers Noise and Vibration Conference Proceedings, St. Charles, Ill., May 2009. 25. Reyff, J., REMEL Database Developed for Different PCC Pavement Surfaces, Proceedings of Noise-Con 2007, Reno, Nev., October 2007. 26. Rochat, J., and Read, D., Noise Benefits of Asphalt Pavements— Trends at Ages up to 52 Months, Noise Control Engineering Journal, 57 (2), March 2009, pp. 104–111. 27. Donavan, P., Eight Year Evaluation of the Noise Performance of the Caltrans Asphalt Research Pavements on LA 138, California Department of Transportation, Division of Environmental Analysis, Sacramento, CA, prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., Petaluma, CA, May 2011. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/pub/LA138_ 8YrFlexible_QPRStudy.pdf. 28. Lua, Q., Harvey, J., Kohler, E., Rymer, B., and Motumahe, L., Com- parison of Tire-Pavement Noise Characteristics of Rubberized and Conventional Asphalt Concrete Mixes, Noise Control Engineering Journal, 59 (3), May–June 2011. 29. Rasmussen, R., Mun, E., Turner, D., Whirledge, R., Ferragut, T., and Wiegand, P., Using On-Board Sound Intensity within the Concrete Pavement Surface Characteristics Program, Proceedings of Noise- Con 2007, Reno, Nev., October 2007. 30. Rasmussen, R., Whirledge, R., Light, R., Ferragut, T., and Wiegand, P., NITE II: Noise Intensity Testing in Europe, the Sequel, Proceedings of Noise-Con 2008, Dearborn, Mich., July 2008. 31. Lau, M., Lee, C., Rochat, J., Boeker, E., and Fleming, G., FHWA Traf- fic Noise Model User’s Guide (Version 2.5 Addendum), U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Natural and Human Environment, 2004. 32. Donavan, P., and Rymer, B., Measurements of the Vertical Distribu- tion of Truck Noise Sources During Highway Cruise Pass-bys Using Acoustic Beam Forming, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2123, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 145–152. 33. Donavan, P. R., and Lodico, D. M. Influence of Quieter Pavement and Absorptive Barriers on US Highway 101 in Marin County, Cali- fornia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transporta- tion Research Board, No. 2362, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 25–34. 34. Donavan, P., The Effects of Porous Pavements on Tire/Pavement Noise Source Levels and Pass-By Measurements, Proceedings of Noise-Con 2011, Portland, Ore., July 2011. 35. Wilde, W., Waalkes, S., and Harrison, R., Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Portland Cement Concrete Pavements, Research Report 0-1739-1, Texas Department of Transportation, prepared by the Center of Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, September 1999. 36. Shrouds, J., Information: Highway Traffic Noise—Guidance on Quiet Pavement Pilot Programs and Tire/Pavement Noise Research, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administra- tion, Office of Natural and Human Environment, January 19, 2005. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/qpppmem.htm. 37. WSDOT Pavement Policy, Draft Copy, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Wash., January 2010. http://www.wsdot. wa.gov/biz/mats/Apps/DraftWSDOTPavementPolicy2-2-10.pdf. 38. Prieto, J., South Holgate Street to South King Street Viaduct Replace- ment Project, Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle, Wash., June 2008. 39. Summary of Noise Barriers Constructed by December 31, 2010, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2010. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ noise/noise_barriers/inventory/summary/index.cfm. 40. Kay, D., Morgan, S., and Bodapati, S. N., Evaluation of Service Life of Noise Barrier Walls in Illinois, Illinois Department of Transporta- tion, Springfield, Ill., 1999. 41. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23: Highways, Part 626– Pavement Policy. http://cfr.regstoday.com/23cfr626.aspx 42. Pavement Design Considerations, Non-Regulatory Supplement NS 23 CFR, Part 626, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2010. http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/cfr06261.cfm. 43. Laughlin, J., Ship Canal Bridge Noise Abatement: Results and Lessons Learned, Proceedings of Noise-Con 2011, Portland, Ore., July 2011. 44. Donavan, P., Quieting of Portland Cement Concrete Highway Sur- faces with Texture Modifications, Proceedings of Noise-Con 2005, Minneapolis, Minn., October 2005. 45. Donavan, P., and Scofield, L., An Evaluation of the Effects of Dif- ferent Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Texturing on Tire/ Pavement Noise, Proceedings of Noise-Con 2003, Cleveland, Ohio, June 2003. 46. Herman, L., and Withers, J., Effectiveness of Tire/Road Noise Abate- ment Through Surface Retexturing by Diamond Grinding, Report No. FHWA/OH-2005/009, Ohio Research Institute for Transpor- tation and the Environment (ORITE), Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, June 2005. 47. PS-08-08 Effectiveness of Noise Barriers Installed Adjacent to Trans- verse Grooved Concrete Pavement, Ohio Department of Transpor- tation, Office of Research and Development, Columbus, Ohio, February 2007. 48. Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., The Tire-Noise Performance of Ohio Highway Pavements: On-Board Sound Intensity (OBSI) Measure- ments, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio, July 2010. 49. Fidell, S., and Pearsons, K., Sensitivity to Prospective Transporta- tion Noise Exposure, Noise Control Engineering Journal, 51 (2), March–April 2003, pp. 106–113. 50. Schomer, P., Criteria for Assessment of Noise Annoyance, Noise Control Engineering Journal, 53 (4), July–August 2005, pp. 125–137. 51. Scofield, L., and Donavan, P., Early Results of the Arizona Quiet Pavement Program, Proceedings of the 80th Meeting of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Long Beach, Calif., March 7–9, 2005. 52. Burge, P., Sytsma, J., and Zurburg, T., Meteorological Influence of Highway Noise Barrier Performance, a Case Study, Proceedings of Noise-Con 2010, Institute of Noise Control Engineering, Baltimore, Md., April 2010. 53. Beranek, L., and Ver, I., Noise and Vibration Control Engineering, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1992, pp. 128–129. 54. DeJong, R., A Model Study of the Effects of Wind on the Sound Attenuation of Barriers, NSF/RANN Grant #137811 Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Acoustics and Vibration Laboratory, Cambridge, Mass., May 1974. 55. Sandberg, U., and Ejsmont, J., Tyre/Road Noise Reference Book, INFORMEX Ejsmont & Sandberg Handelsbolag, Harg, SE-590 40 Kisa, Sweden, 2002, p. 167. 56. Scofield, L., Evaluation of Acoustic Longevity of Diamond Ground Surfaces, Compendium of Papers (CD-ROM), Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.

62 57. Donavan, P., and Rymer, B., The Acoustic Longevity of Various Pavements for Noise Reduction Performance Based on On-Board Sound Intensity Measurements, Proceedings of Noise-Con 2010, Baltimore, Md., April 2010. 58. Donavan, P., and Rymer, B., Effects of Aging on Tire/Pavement Noise Generation for Concrete Pavements of Different Textures, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2233, 2011, pp. 152–160. 59. Donavan, P., On-Board Sound Intensity Evaluation of US 69 Kansas and SR 58 California Test Sections, Technical Memoran- dum, American Concrete Pavement Association, prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., November 10, 2010. 60. Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, California Department of Transportation, May 2011. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/ pub/ca_tnap_may2011.pdf. 61. 2011 Traffic Noise Policy and Procedures, Washington State Depart- ment of Transportation, August 2011. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/ NR/rdonlyres/540BA5B6-4329-43C6-A11D-44F153236E70/0/ 2011NoisePolicy.pdf. 62. Highway Noise Analysis and Abatement Handbook, Michigan Depart- ment of Transportation, July 2011. http://www.michigan.gov/ documents/mdot/MDOT_HighwayNoiseAnalysis_and_Abatement Handbook_358156_7.pdf. 63. Type I and Type II Noise Abatement Policies and Procedures, Massa- chusetts Department of Transportation, Boston, Mass., July 2011. 64. Donavan, P., OBSI User Comparison Testing Conducted on High- ways in North Carolina, Noise-Con 2011, Portland, Ore., July 2011. https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Compli- ance%20Guides%20and%20Procedures/NCDOT%20Traffic%20 Noise%20Analysis%20and%20Abatement%20Manual.pdf. 65. Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Manual, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Human Environment Unit, Raleigh, N.C., July 2011. 66. Noise Abatement Policy, Arizona Department of Transportation, Environmental Planning Group, Phoenix, Ariz., July 2011. 67. Donavan, P., and Scofield, L., An Evaluation of the Effects of Different Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Texturing on Tire/Pavement Noise, Proceedings of Noise-Con 2003, Cleveland, Ohio, June 2003.

Next: Appendices »
Evaluating Pavement Strategies and Barriers for Noise Mitigation Get This Book
×
 Evaluating Pavement Strategies and Barriers for Noise Mitigation
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 738: Evaluating Pavement Strategies and Barriers for Noise Mitigation presents a methodology for evaluating feasibility, reasonableness, effectiveness, acoustic longevity, and economic features of pavement strategies and barriers for noise mitigation.

The methodology uses a life-cycle cost analysis to examine the economic features of mitigation alternatives, the FHWA Traffic Noise Model to integrate the noise reduction performance of pavements and barriers, and on-board sound intensity measurements as an input to the prediction model.

The appendixes contained in the research agency’s final report provide elaborations and detail on several aspects of the research. The appendixes are not included with the print version of the report, but are available online.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!