National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Research Findings and Conclusions
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Effect of Smart Growth Policies on Travel Demand. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22616.
×
Page 91
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Effect of Smart Growth Policies on Travel Demand. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22616.
×
Page 92
Page 93
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Effect of Smart Growth Policies on Travel Demand. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22616.
×
Page 93
Page 94
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Effect of Smart Growth Policies on Travel Demand. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22616.
×
Page 94
Page 95
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Effect of Smart Growth Policies on Travel Demand. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22616.
×
Page 95
Page 96
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Effect of Smart Growth Policies on Travel Demand. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22616.
×
Page 96

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

91 Allen, J., and M. Browne. 2010. Considering the relationship between freight transportation and urban form. Green Logistics report, University of Westminster, London. Available: http://www.green logistics.org/themesandoutputs/wm9/downloads/Freight%20 transport%20and%20urban%20form%20Final%20September% 202010.pdf. Allen, J., G. Tanner, M. Browne, S. Anderson, G. Chrisodoulou, and P. Jones. 2003. Modelling Policy Measures and Company Initiatives for Sustainable Urban Distribution; Final Technical Report. Transport Studies Group, University of Westminster, London. Andreoli, D., A. Goodchild, and K. Vitasek. 2010. The Rise of Mega Distribution Centers and the Impact on Logistical Uncertainty. Transportation Letters 2(2), pp. 75–88. Arrington, G., and R. Cervero. 2008. TCRP Report 128: Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking, and Travel. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Ballis, A. 2006. Freight Villages: Warehouse Design and Rail Link Aspects. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1966, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 27–33. Bassok, A., and A. Goodchild. 2011. Smart Growth and Urban Goods Movement. Draft of NCFRP 32 Project Literature Review. Becker, R. A., J. M. Chambers, J. M., and A. R. Wilks. 1988. The New S Language. Chapman & Hall, London, UK. Bertram, K., D. Santini, J. Anderson, and A. Vyas. 2008. Trends in the Size Distribution, Highway Use, and Consumption of Gasoline and Diesel Fuels of the U.S. Commercial Truck Fleet, 1977–2002. Pro- ceedings, 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Bomar, M. A., E. P. Becker, and E. R. Stolloff. 2009a. Urban Freight Case Studies–New York. U.S. Department of Transportation report FHWA-HOP-10-019. Bomar, M. A., E. P. Becker, and E. R. Stolloff. 2009b. Urban Freight Case Studies—Los Angeles. U.S. Department of Transportation report FHWA-HOP-10-020. Washington, D.C. Bomar, M. A., E. P. Becker, and E. R. Stolloff. 2009c. Urban Freight Case Studies–Orlando. U.S. Department of Transportation report FHWA-HOP-10-021. Washington, D.C. Bragado, N. 1999. Transit Joint Development in San Diego: Policies and Practices. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transpor- tation Research Board, No. 1669, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 22–29. Bronzini, M. S. 2008. Relationships between Land Use and Freight and Commercial Truck Traffic in Metropolitan Areas. Report commissioned by NAS Committee B0103 Committee for the Study on the Relationships among Development Patterns, VMT, and Energy Conservation. Brunner et al. 1987. Life as Narrative. Social Research, 11–32. Burchell, R., G. Lowenstein, W. Dolphin, C. Galley, A. Downs, S. Seskin, K. Still, and T. Moore. 2002. TCRP Report 74: Costs of Sprawl—2000. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Burchell, R., N. Shad, D. Listokin, H. Phillips, A. Downs, S. Seskin, J. Davis, T. Moore, D. Helton, and M. Gall. 1998. TCRP Report 39: Costs of Sprawl Revisited. TRB, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C. California Department of Transportation. 2010. Smart Mobility: A Caltrans Handbook. Sacramento. California Transportation Commission. 2010. 2010 California Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines. Sacramento. Cao, X., P. Mokhtarian, and S. Handy. 2009. Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings. Transport Reviews, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 359–395. CEC. 2011. Destination Sustainability Report: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Freight Transportation in North America. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Center for Neighborhood Technology. 2010. The Pennywise and Pound Fuelish: New Measures of Housing and Transportation Affordability. Chicago, Ill. Center for Transit-Oriented Development. 2010. Performance-Based Transit-Oriented Development Typology Guidebook. Washington, D.C. Cervero, R. 1988. Land-Use Mixing and Suburban Mobility. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 429–446. Cervero, R. 1989a. Suburban Employment Centers: Probing the Influence of Site Features on the Journey-to-Work. Journal of Planning and Education Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 75–85. Cervero, R. 1989b. Jobs-Housing Balancing and Regional Mobility. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 136–150. Cervero, R. 1991. Land Uses and Travel at Suburban Activity Centers. Working paper, University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley. Cervero, R. 1993. Ridership Impacts of Transit-Focused Development in California. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Monograph 45. Cervero, R. 1994. Transit-Based Housing in California: Evidence on Ridership Impacts. Transport Policy, Vol. 3, pp. 174–183. Cervero, R. 1996. Jobs-Housing Balance Revisited. Journal of the Ameri- can Planning Association, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 15–42. References

92 Cox, W. 2003a. How Higher Density Makes Traffic Worse. The Public Purpose website, Number 57. Available at http://www.publicpurpose .com/pp57-density.htm. Cox, W. 2003b. International Journey to Work Travel Times by Population Density. Available at http://www.demographia.com/ db-intljtwdens.htm. Cox, W. 2005. Land Use Policy: Pulling Up the Ladder of Opportunity. New Coalition News & Views, New Coalition for Economic and Social Change. Crane, R. 1996. “On Form versus Function: Will the New Urbanism Reduce Traffic, or Increase It?” Journal of Planning Education and Research 15, pp. 117–126. Crane, R., and R. Crepeau. 1998. Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel? A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data. Trans- portation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 225–238. Davies, J., M. Grant, J. Venezia, and J. Aamidor. 2006. U.S. Transporta- tion Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Trends, Uncertainties and Methodological Improvements, Proceedings, 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Davis, S., and S. Diegel. 2007. Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 26. Center for Transportation Analysis: Energy Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Available at http://cta.ornl.gov/data/ index.shtml. DeCorla-Souza, P., and H. Cohen. 1999. Estimating induced travel for evaluation of metropolitan highway expansion. Transportation, Vol. 26, pp. 249–262. DeCorla-Souza, P., and H. Cohen. 1998. Accounting for Induced Travel in Evaluation of Urban Highway Expansion. Available at http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/steam/doc.htm. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. 2009. Connections: The Regional Plan for a Sustainable Future. Philadelphia, Pa. Denver Regional Transportation District. 2008. 2008 Quality of Life Study: High Level Measures. Denver, Colo. DKS Associates et al. 2007. Assessment of Local Models and Tools for Analyzing Smart-Growth Strategies. State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento. Downs, A. 1962. The Law of Peak-Hour Expressway Congestion. Traffic Quarterly Vol. 16, pp. 393–409. Downs, A. 1992. Stuck in Traffic. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Downs, A. 2004a. Why Traffic Congestion is Here to Stay . . . and Will Get Worse. Access, No. 25, pp. 19–25. Downs, A. 2004b. Still Stuck in Traffic. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. EPA. 2006. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through 2006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fetrends.htm. Ewing, R. 1996. Pedestrian- and Transit-Friendly Design, Florida Depart- ment of Transportation, Tallahassee, Appendix C. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2001. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 87–114. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2010. “Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 265–294. Ewing, R., K. Bartholomew, S. Winkelman, J. Walters, and D. Chen, with B. McCann and D. Goldberg. 2008. Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., p. 127. Cervero, R. 2002a. Built Environments and Mode Choice: Toward A Normative Framework. Transportation Research Part D: Transporta- tion and Environment, Vol. 7, Issue 4, pp. 265–284. Cervero, R. 2002b. Induced Travel Demand: Research Design, Empirical Evidence, and Normative Policies. Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 3–20. Cervero, R. 2003. Road Expansion, Urban Growth, and Induced Travel: A Path Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 145–163. Cervero, R. 2006. Alternative Approaches to Modeling the Travel-Demand Impacts of Smart Growth. Journal of the American Planning Associa- tion, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 285–295. Cervero, R. 2007a. Transit-Oriented Corridors. The Transportation/ Land Use Connection, T. Moore, P. Thornes, B. Appleyard, Planning Advisory Service Report Number 546/547, pp. 136–137. Cervero, R. 2007b. Transit Oriented Development’s Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-Selection and Public Policies. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 39, No. 9, pp. 2068–2085. Cervero, R., and Arrington, G. 2008. Vehicle Trip Reduction Impacts of Transit-Oriented Housing. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 1–17. Cervero, R., and M. Duncan. 2006. Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs-Housing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), pp. 475–490. Cervero, R., and R. Gorham. 1995. Commuting in Transit versus Automobile Neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Asso- ciation 61 (2), pp. 210–225. Cervero, R., and M. Hansen. 2002. Induced Travel Demand and Induced Road Investment: A Simultaneous Equation Analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 469–490. Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Den- sity, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 199–219. Cervero, R., and J. Landis. 1992. Suburbanization of Jobs and the Journey to Work: A Submarket Analysis of Commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 275–298. Cervero, R., and C. Radisch. 1996. Travel Choices in Pedestrian versus Automobile-Oriented Neighborhoods. Transport Policy, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 127–141. Cervero, R., A. Adkins, and C. Sullivan. 2010. Are Suburban TODs Over-parked? Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2010, pp. 47–70. Cervero, R., J. Kang, and K. Shively. 2009. From Elevated Free- ways to Surface Boulevards: Neighborhood and Housing Price Impacts in San Francisco. Journal of Urbanism, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2009, pp. 31–50. Cervero, R., G. Arrington, G. Smith-Heimer, and R. Dunphy. 2004. TCRP Report 102: Transit Oriented Development in America: Experi- ences, Challenges, and Prospects. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. CFS. 2007. The Commodity Flow Survey (CFS), partnership between the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Chatman, D. 2009. Residential Choice, the Built Environment, and Non- work Travel: Evidence Using New Data and Methods. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 1072–1089. Chen, C., H. Gong, and R. Paaswell. 2007. Role of the Built Environment on Mode Choice Decisions: Additional Evidence on the Impact of Density. Transportation 35, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 285–299. Cortright, J. 2009. Walking the Walk—How Walkability Raises Home Values in U.S. Cities. Impresa, Inc., for CEOs for Cities.

93 Ewing, R., E. Dumbaugh, and M. Brown. 2001. Internalizing Travel by Mixing Land Uses: Study of Master-Planned Communities in South Florida. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transpor- tation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 115–120. Ewing, R., M. Greenwald, M. Zhang, J. Walters, M. Feldman, R. Cervero, L. Frank, and J. Thomas. 2011. Traffic Generated by Mixed-Use Developments: A Six-Region Study Using Consistent Built Environ- mental Measures. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 137, No. 3, pp. 248–261. Ewing, R., P. Haliyur, and W. Page. 1994. Getting Around a Traditional City, a Suburban PUD and Everything In-Between. In Transporta- tion Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., pp. 53–62. Ewing, R., K. Thomas, and V. John. 2009. Residential Construction Trends in America’s Metropolitan Regions. U.S. Environmental Pro- tection Agency. Fagnant, D. K., K. M. Kockelman, and C. Xie. 2011. Anticipating Road- way Expansion and Tolling Impacts: A Toolkit for Abstracted Networks. Proceedings, 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Fehr & Peers. 2004. Legacy Parkway Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Draft Technical Memorandum on Integration of Highways and Transit in the North Corridor. Salt Lake City, Utah, Federal Highway Administration regional office. Fehr & Peers. 2005. SLOCOG Travel Demand Model–Development Report. San Luis Obispo, Calif. Fehr & Peers. 2011. Chenggong Central District Transportation Evaluation—Network Screenline Capacity Assessment. San Jose, Calif. Ferrell, C. 2005. Home-based Teleshopping and Shopping Travel: Where Do People Find the Time? In Transportation Research Record 1926: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 212–223. FHWA. 1997a. Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study Final Report. Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ hcas/final/two.htm. FHWA. 1997b. Surface Transportation Efficiency Analysis Model (STEAM). Federal Highway Administration. http://www.fhwa.dot .gov/steam. FHWA. 2005. HERS-ST Highway Economic Requirements System— State Version: Technical Report. Chapter 6. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2007a. Congestion: Non-Work Trips in Peak Travel Times, Con- gestion: Who is Traveling in the Peak? NHTS Brief, pp. 1–3. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2007b. Freight Facts and Figures 2007. FHWA-HOP-08-004, Office of Freight Management and Operations, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. Available at http://ops.fhwa.dot .gov/freight/freight_analysis/nat_freight_stats/docs/07factsfigures/ pdf/fff2007.pdf. FHWA. 2007c. NHTS Brief: National Household Travel Survey. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2012. Freight and Land Use Handbook. Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.ops.fhwa.dot .gov/publications/fhwahop12006/index.htm#toc. Fischer, M. J., and M. Han. 2001. NCHRP Synthesis Report 298: Truck Trip Generation Data: A Synthesis of Highway Practice. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Florida Department of Transportation. 2000. Community Impact Assess- ment: A Handbook for Transportation Professionals. Tallahassee. Florida Department of Transportation. 2008. Strategic Investment Tool. Tallahassee. Florida Department of Transportation. 2009. 2009 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Tallahassee. Frank, L., and G. Pivo. 1994. Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Tran- sit, and Walking. Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 44–52. Frank, L., B. E. Saelens, K. E. Powell, and J. E. Chapman. 2007. Stepping Towards Causation: Do Built Environments or Neighborhood and Travel Preferences Explain Physical Activity, Driving, and Obesity? Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 65, No. 9, pp. 1898–1914. Frank, L. D., B. Stone, and W. Bachman. 2000. Linking Land Use with Household Vehicle Emissions in the Puget Sound Region. Trans- portation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 173–196. Fulton, L., D. Meszler, R. Noland, and J. Thomas. 2000. A Statistical Analysis of Induced Travel Effects in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Region. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1–14. Funderburg, R. G., H. Nixon, M. G. Boarnet, and G. Ferguson. 2010. New Highways and Land Use Change: Results from a Quasi-Experimental Research Design. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 44, pp. 76–98. Giuliano, G., and K. Small. 1993. Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure? Urban Studies, Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1485–1502. Goodwin, P. 1996. Empirical Evidence on Induced Traffic. Transportation 23 (1), pp. 35–54. Goodwin, P., C. Haas-Klua, and S. Cairns. 1998. Evidence on the Effects of Road Capacity Reduction on Traffic Levels. Journal of Transporta- tion Engineering and Control 39, 6, pp. 348–354. Gregor, B. 2011. Greenhouse Gas Statewide Transportation Planning Emissions Model (GreenSTEP Model) Documentation. Oregon Department of Transportation, Transportation Planning Analysis Unit, Salem. Gulipalli, P., and K. Kockelman. 2008. Credit-Based Congestion Pricing: A Dallas–Fort Worth Application. Transport Policy 15 (1), pp. 23–32. Handy, S. 1992. Regional versus Local Accessibility: Neotraditional Devel- opment and Its Implications for Non-work Travel. Built Environment, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 253–267. Handy, S. 1996. Urban Form and Pedestrian Choices: Study of Austin neighborhoods. In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 135–144. Hansen, M., and Y. Huang. 1997. Road Supply and Traffic in California Urban Areas. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 31, pp. 205–218. Hassall, K. 2005. The public logistics terminal. Public Infrastructure Bulletin 1 (5): Article 6. Available at http://epublications.bond.edu .au/pib/vol1/iss5/6. Heanue, K. 1997. Transportation Research Circular 481: Highway Capacity and Induced Travel: Issues, Evidence and Implications. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 33–45. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Holguín-Veras, J., C. A. T. Cruz, and X. Ban. (in press). On the Comparative Performance of Urban Delivery Vehicle Classes. Transportmetrica. Holguín-Veras, J., M. Jaller, L. Destro, X. Ban, C. Lawson, and H. Levinson. 2011. Freight Generation, Freight Trip Generation, and the Perils of Constant Trip Rates. Working paper, under review for presentation at the January 2012 Annual Meeting of the TRB. Holguín-Veras, J., Q. Wang, N. Xu, K. Ozbay, M. Cetin, and J. Polimeni. 2006. Impacts of Time of Day Pricing on the Behavior of Freight

94 Carriers in a Congested Urban Area: Implications to Road Pricing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 40 (9), pp. 744–766. Holtzclaw, J., R. Clear, H. Dittmar, D. Goldstein, and P. Haas. 2002. Location Efficiency: Neighborhood and Socio-Economic Charac- teristics Determine Auto Ownership and Use–Studies in Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco. Transportation Planning and Tech- nology, Vol. 25, pp. 1–27. Huang, H. F., J. R. Stewart, and C. V. Zegeer. 2002. Evaluation of Lane Reduction “Road Diet” Measures on Crashes and Injuries. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 80–90. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2001. Trip Generation Handbook. ITE, Washington, D.C. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2008. Trip Generation, 8th Edi- tion. ITE Washington, D.C. JHK and Associates. 1987. Development-Related Survey I. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Washington, D.C. JHK and Associates. 1989. Development-Related Survey II. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Washington, D.C. Johnston, R. A. 2008. Review of U.S. and European Regional Modeling Studies of Policies Intended to Reduce Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-08-12. Available at http://pubs.its.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=1166. Jonathan Rose Companies and Wallace Robert Todd, LLC. 2011. The Location Efficiency and Housing Types—Boiling it Down to BTU’s. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Kakaraparthi, S., and K. Kockelman. 2010. An Application of UrbanSim to the Austin, Texas Region: Integrated Model Forecasts for the Year 2030. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 137, No. 3, pp. 238–247. Kasturi, T., X. Sun, and C. Wilcox. 1998. Household Travel, Household Characteristics, and Land Use: An Empirical Study from the 1994 Portland Activity-Based Travel Survey. In Transportation Research Record 1617, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 16–17. Kittelson Associates and J. R. Kuzmyak, LLC. 2010. Alternative Adequate Public Facilities Requirements for Centers and Corridors. Final Report. Maryland National Capital Parks & Planning Commission, Prince George’s County, Md. Klastorin, T., G. Pivo, M. Pilcher, D. Carlson, C. Hyman, S. Hansen, P. Hess, and A. Thatte. 1995. Urban Goods and Intercity Freight Movement. Report for the Washington State DOT (WA-RD 373.1). Available at http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/research/reports/fullreports/373.1.pdf. Kockelman, K., and S. Kalmanje. 2004. Credit-Based Congestion Pricing: Travel, Land Value, and Welfare Impacts. In Transportation Research Record No. 1864: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 45–53. Kockelman, K., M. Bomberg, M. Thompson, and C. Whitehead. 2008. GHG Emissions Control Options: Opportunities for Conservation. Report Commissioned by the National Academy of Sciences for the Committee for the Study on the Relationships Among Development Patterns, VMT, and Energy Conservation. Washington, D.C. Kooshian, C., and S. Winkelman. 2011. Growing Wealthier: Smart Growth, Climate Change and Prosperity. Prepared for the Center for Clean Air Policy. Washington, D.C. Krizek, K. 2003. Residential Relocation and Change in Urban Travel: Does Neighborhood-Scale Urban Form Matter? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 265–281. Kulash, W., J. Anglin, and D. Marks. 1990. Traditional Neighborhood Development: Will the Traffic Work? American Society of Civil Engi- neers, Successful Land Development: Quality and Profits Conference, Reston, Va. Kuzmyak, R. 2006. Test Applications of New Models of Household VMT and Vehicle Ownership on Alternative Growth Scenarios for the I-95 Corridor in Howard and Anne Arundel (MD) Counties. Unpublished white paper. Baltimore Metropolitan Council, Baltimore, Md. Kuzmyak, J. R., Caliper Corporation, and PolyTech Corporation. 2012. Land Use and Traffic Congestion Study. Final Report 618. Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix. Kuzmyak, R., R. Pratt, G. Douglas, and F. Spielberg. 2003. TCRP Report 95: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Lee, D., L. Klein, and G. Camus. 1999. Induced Traffic and Induced Demand. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transpor- tation Research Board, No. 1659, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 68–75. Lemp, J. 2007. Quantifying Benefits of Activity-Based Microsimula- tion Models of Travel Demand: A Case Study of Austin, Texas. Master’s Thesis. Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environ- mental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin. Lemp, J., and K. Kockelman. 2009a. Anticipating Welfare Impacts via Travel Demand Forecasting Models: Comparison of Aggregate and Activity-Based Approaches for the Austin, Texas Region. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2133, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 11–22. Lemp, J., and K. Kockelman. 2009b. The Financing of New Highways: Opportunities for Welfare Analysis and Credit-Based Congestion Pricing. Proceedings, 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Litman, T. 2011. Evaluating Criticism of Smart Growth. Victoria Trans- port Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Available at http://www.vtpi.org/sgcritics.pdf. Litman, T., and T. Alexander. 2010. Sustainable Transport Indicator Data Quality and Availability. Transportation Research Board 2010 Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Paper 10-2496. Lu, X., M. Hanson, M. Graham, E. Nishinga, and R. Lu. 2007. Investigating the Possibility of Using BART for Air Freight Movement. Presented at 2nd National Urban Freight Conference, Long Beach, Calif. Lund, H., R. Cervero, and R. Wilson. 2004. Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California. Oakland: Bay Areas Rapid Transit District. Lund, H., R. Willson, and R. Cervero. 2006. A Re-evaluation of Travel Behavior in California TODs. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 247–263. Marquez, L., N. Smith, D. Kilsby, M. Taylor, and R. Zito. 2004. Assessing Impacts of GHG Abatement Measures on Urban Freight. In Logistics Systems for Sustainable Cities: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on City Logistics, Madeira, Portugal, 2003, ed. E. Tanigu- chi and R. Thompson. McCann, B. 2001. Easing the Burden: Why Are the Roads So Congested? A Companion Analysis of the Texas Transportation Institute’s Urban Mobility Study. Surface Transportation Policy Project slideshow. Available at www.transact.org. McCormack, E., and A. Bassok. 2011. Evaluating Two Low Cost Methods for Collecting Truck Generation Data Using Grocery Stores. Journal of the Institute of Transportation Engineers 81, pp. 34–39. McGregor, M. 2006. The Cross Harbor Rail Freight Tunnel: A Critical Transportation Project for the New York Region’s Future. Presented

95 at National Urban Freight Conference, Long Beach, Calif. Available at http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/McGregor.pdf. McNally, M. G., and S. Ryan. 1993. Comparative Assessment of Travel Characteristics for Neotraditional Designs. In Transportation Research Record 1400, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 67–77. Metro. 2010. 2035 Regional Transportation Plan. Portland, Ore. MetroPlan Orlando. 2009. 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan. Orlando, Fla. Metz, D. 2008. The Myth of Travel Time Savings. Transport Reviews, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 321–336. Miller, E., and A. Ibrahim. 1998. Urban Form and Vehicular Travel: Some Empirical Findings. In Transportation Research Record 1617, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 18–27. Morris, A. G. 2004. The Impact of Inadequate Off-loading Facilities in Commercial Office Buildings. Upon Freight Efficiency and Security in Urban Areas. European Transport No. 28, pp. 85–93. Morris, A. G., A. L. Kornhauser, and M. J. Kay. 1999. Getting the Goods Delivered in Dense Urban Areas: A Snapshot of the Last Link of the Supply Chain. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1653, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 34–41. Move NY & NJ. 2007. Truck Traffic Reduction: A Vital Need for Easing Congestion. At http://www.moveny.org/MoveNYNJ_Presentation_ 10-31-2007.pdf (accessed by M. S. Bronzini on Aug. 15, 2008). National Cooperative Highway Research Program. 2011. NCHRP Report 684: Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed Use Devel- opments. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. National Research Council. 2009. Special Report 298: Driving and the Built Environment: The Effects of Compact Development on Motorized Travel, Energy Use, and CO2 Emissions. Committee for the Study on the Relationships Among Development Patterns, Vehicle Miles Traveled, and Energy Consumption, Transportation Research Board, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12747.html. New York State Department of Transportation. Smart Growth Checklist. https://www.nysdot.gov/programs/smart-planning/tools. Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy. 1989. Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook. Aldershot, UK, Gower Publishing. Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy. 1999. Costs of Automobile Dependence: Global Survey of Cities. Transportation Research Record 1670, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 17–26. Noland, R. 2001. Relationships Between Highway Capacity and Induced Vehicle Travel. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 35, pp. 47–72. Noland, R., and L. Lem. 2002. A Review of the Evidence for Induced Travel and Changes in Transportation and Environmental Policy in the U.S. and UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 7, pp. 1–26. Ory, D., P. Mokhtarian, S. Lothlorien, I. Salomon, G. Collanges, and S. Choo. 2004. When Is Commuting Desirable to the Individual? Growth and Change, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 334–359. O’Toole, R. 2006. The Planning Penalty: How Smart Growth Makes Housing Unaffordable. American Dream Coalition. O’Toole, R. (Winter 2007). Debunking Portland. Newsletter of the American Dream Coalition. Pells, S. R. 1989. User Response to New Road Capacity: A Review of Published Evidence. Paper 283, University of Leeds, Institute for Transport, Leeds, UK. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. 2010. Improving the Land Use-Transportation Connection through Local Improvement Tools. Harrisburg. The Pew Center on the States and the Rockefeller Foundation. 2011. Mea- suring Transportation Investments: The Road to Results. New York. Pitera, K., F. Sandoval, and A. Goodchild. 2011. Emissions Reduction Evaluation in Urban Pickup Systems: A Heterogeneous Fleet Case Study. Proceedings, 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Pivo, G., D. Carlson, M. Kitchen, and D. Billen. 1997. Learning From Truckers: Moving Goods in Compact, Livable Urban Areas. Washington State Transportation Commission, Olympia. Pivo, G., D. Carlson, M. Kitchen, and D. Billen. 2002. Learning from Truckers: Truck Drivers’ Views on the Planning and Design of Urban and Suburban Centers. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research 19 (1), pp. 12–29. Pivo, G., and J. D. Fisher. 2009. The Effects of Walkability on Property Values and Investment. Prepared for the Responsible Property Investing Center, Boston College, University of Arizona Benecki Center for Real Estate Studies, and Indiana University. Prasad, S. 2011. Smart Growth Compatibility with Goods Movement and Environmental Justice. Presented at 10th Annual New Partners for Smart Growth conference, Building Safe, Healthy and Livable Communities, Charlotte, N.C. Available at http://www.newpartners .org/docs/presentations/fri/NP11_Prasad.pdf. PSRC. 2009. Planning for Freight in the Central Puget Sound Region. Puget Sound Regional Council report. Seattle, Wash. Quak, H. J., and M. B. M. de Koster. 2007. Exploring Retailers’ Sensi- tivity to Local Sustainability Policies. Journal of Operations Manage- ment 25 (6), pp. 1103–1122. Quak, H. J., and M. B. M. de Koster. 2009. Delivering Goods in Urban Areas: How to Deal with Urban Policy Restrictions and the Environ- ment. Transportation Science 43 (2), pp. 211–227. Rakha, H., and Y. Ding. 2003. Impact of Stops on Vehicle Fuel Consump- tion and Emissions. Journal of Transportation Engineering 129 (10), pp. 1–10. Renaissance Planning Group et al. 2011. NCHRP Project 08-78: Esti- mating Bicycling and Pedestrian Demand for Planning and Project Development. Interim Report, April 2011. Resource Systems Group. 2011. Energy and Emissions Reduction Policy Analysis Tool Model Documentation (EERPAT), prepared for the Federal Highway Administration. Rodriquez, D., A. Khattak, and K. Evenson. 2006. Can New Urbanism Encourage Physical Activity? Journal of the American Planning Asso- ciation, Vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 43–54. Saelens, B., J. Sallis, and D. Chen. 2003. Neighborhood-based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 93, No. 9, pp. 1552–1558. Salomon, I., and P. Mokhtarian. 1997. Coping with Congestion: Understanding the Gap Between Policy Assumption and Behavior. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 107–123. San Francisco Department of Parking and Traffic. 2006. Octavia Boule- vard Operation, Six Month Report. Unpublished department report. San Francisco, Calif. Sarzynski, A., M. Brown, and F. Southworth. 2008. Shrinking the Carbon Footprint of Metropolitan America. Brookings Institution Report. Available at http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/reports/2008/ 05_carbon_footprint_sarzynski/carbonfootprint_report.pdf. Schiffer, R. G., M. W. Steinvorth, and R. T. Milam. 2005. Comparative Evaluations on the Elasticity of Travel Demand. Committee on

96 Transportation Demand Forecasting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Shrank, D., and T. Lomax. 2009. 2009 Annual Urban Mobility Report. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System. http://mobility.tamu.edu. Southworth, F., A. Sonnenberg, and M. A. Brown. 2008. The Transpor- tation Energy and Carbon Footprints of the 100 Largest U.S. Metro- politan Areas. Working Paper No. 37, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga. Available at http://www.spp .gatech.edu/faculty/workingpapers/wp37.pdf. Sperry, B., M. Burris, and E. Dumbaugh. 2010. A Case Study of Induced Trips at Mixed-Use Developments. Washington, D.C. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Still, T. 2002. Transit-Oriented Development: Reshaping America’s Metropolitan Landscape. On Common Ground, Winter, pp. 44–47. Strauss-Weider, A. 2003. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 320: Integrating Freight Facilities and Operations with Community Goals. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_320.pdf. Stringham, M. 1982. Travel Behavior Associated with Land Uses Adja- cent to Rapid Transit Stations. ITE Journal, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 18–22. Systan, Inc. 1997. Central Freeway Evaluation Report. City and County of San Francisco Department of Planning, San Francisco, Calif. Taniguchi, E., M. Noritake, T. Yamada, and T. Izumitani. 1999. Optimal Size and Location Planning of Public Logistics Terminals. Transpor- tation Research 35E (3), pp. 207–222. Thomas Comitta Associates, Inc. 2010. The Smart Growth Transect for Community & Economic Development. Available at http://www .smartgrowthpa.org/files/comitta_sgpwc_11%20x%2017% 20page.pdf. The Tioga Group, Economic & Planning Systems, Meyer Mohaddes Associates, and Jock O’Connell. 2006. SACOG Regional Goods Movement Study, Phase One, Executive Summary. Prepared for the Sacramento Area Council of Governments, Sacramento, Calif. Tirumalachetty, S., and K. Kockelman. 2010. Forecasting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Urban Regions: Microsimulation of Land Use and Transport Patterns in Austin, Texas. Proc., 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Board. 2007. Special Report 288: Metropolitan Travel Forecasting: Current Practice and Future Direction. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Board. 2010. NCHRP Synthesis Report 406: Advanced Practices in Travel Forecasting. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. U.S. DOT. 2009. Fatality Analysis Reporting System General Estimates System. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Available at www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811401.pdf U.S. DOT. 2010. 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Report EC07TCF-US. U.S. Departments of Transportation and Commerce. U.S. DOT. 2004. 2001 National Household Travel Survey User’s Guide. (Version 3). U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C. Available at http://nhts.ornl.gov/2001/usersguide/UsersGuide.pdf. Van Rooijen, T., B. Groothedde, and J. C. Gerdessen. 2008. Quantifying the Effects of Community Level Regulation on City Logistics. In Innovations in City Logistics, ed. E. Taniguchi and R. G. Thompson. Nova Publishers, 2008, pp. 387–400. Vleugel, J., and M. Janic. 2004. Route Choice and the Impact of “Logistics Routes”. In Logistics Systems for Sustainable Cities: Proceed- ings of the Third International Conference on City Logistics, Madeira, Portugal, 2003, ed. E. Taniguchi and R. Thompson. Walters, G., R. Ewing, and W. Schroeer. 2000. Adjusting Computer Modeling Tools to Capture Effects of Smart Growth, or Poking at the Project Like a Lab Rat. Transportation Research Record 1722, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 17–26. Washington State Department of Transportation. 2010. The 2010 Congestion Report. Olympia. Wegener, M. 2008. After the Oil Age: Do We Need to Rebuild our Cities? 5th Oregon Symposium on Integrating Land Use and Transport Models, Portland, Oreg. Weisbrod, G., and S. Fitzroy. 2008. Defining the Range of Urban Con- gestion Impacts on Freight and their Consequences for Business Activity. Proceedings, 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Western Resource Advocates. 2003. Smart Water: A Comparative Study of Urban Water Use Efficiency Across the Southwest. Prepared for the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Surdna Foundation, and the Turner Foundation, Boulder, Colo. Wilbur Smith Associates. 2003. The National I-10 Freight Corridor Study, Technical Memorandum 5: Freight Movement Issues, Texas Department of Transportation. Available at http://www.i10freight study.org/assets/Technical%20Memorandum%205.pdf. Wygonik, E., and A. Goodchild. 2011a. Evaluating the Efficacy of Shared-Use Vehicles for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A U.S. Case Study of Grocery Delivery. Working paper. Wygonik, E., and A. Goodchild. 2011b. Evaluating CO2 Emissions, Cost, and Service Quality Trade-offs in an Urban Delivery System Case Study. IATSS Research. DOI: 10.1016/j.iatssr.2011.05.001. Zahavi, Y. 1979. The UMOT Project. UDOT, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, D.C. Available at http:// www.surveyarchive.org/Zahavi/UMOT_79.pdf. Zhang, M. 2010. Can Transit-Oriented Development Reduce Peak-Hour Congestion? Transportation Research Record 2174: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 148–155. Zhou, B., K. Kockelman, and J. Lemp. 2009. Applications of Integrated Transport and Gravity-Based Land Use Models for Policy Analysis. Transportation Research Record No. 2133: Journal of the Transporta- tion Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 123–132.

Next: Appendix A - Performance Metrics and Tools »
Effect of Smart Growth Policies on Travel Demand Get This Book
×
 Effect of Smart Growth Policies on Travel Demand
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Report S2-C16-RR-1: Effect of Smart Growth Policies on Travel Demand explores the underlying relationships among households, firms, and travel demand. The report also describes a regional scenario planning tool that can be used to evaluate the impacts of various smart growth policies.

SHRP 2 Capacity Project C16 has also released the SmartGAP User’s Guide. SmartGAP is a scenario planning software tool that synthesizes households and firms in a region and determines their travel demand characteristics based on their built environment and transportation policies.

A zipped version of the SmartGAP software is available for download.

Software Disclaimer - SmartGAP is offered as is, without warranty or promise of support of any kind either expressed or implied. Under no circumstance will the National Academy of Sciences or the Transportation Research Board (collectively "TRB") be liable for any loss or damage caused by the installation or operation of this product. TRB makes no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, in fact or in law, including without limitation, the warranty of merchantability or the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not in any case be liable for any consequential or special damages.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!