Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
131 REFERENCES AACEâs Risk Management Committee. 2000. AACE Internationalâs Risk Management Dictionary, Cost Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 28â31. Edwards, W. 2003. âProject Historyâ: Presentation to the National Academy of Engineer- ing Committee for Review of the Project Management Practices Employed on the Boston Central Artery/Tunnel Project on Oct. 21, 2002. In Completing the âBig Digâ: Managing the Final Stages of Bostonâs Central Artery/Tunnel Project (National Research Council). National Academies Press, 2003. Federal Highway Administration. 2007. Issuance of Major Project Guidance, Memorandum of January 19. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/mega/011907.cfm. Accessed April 1, 2010. Flyvbjerg, B., M. Holm, and S. Buhl. 2002. Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 279â295. Golder Associates. 2008a. Implementation Materials for FHWAâs 2006 Guide to Risk Assess ment and Allocation for Highway Construction Management, available from FHWA. Golder Associates. 2008b. Develop a Guide for the Process of Managing Risk on Rapid Renewal ProjectsâTask 1 (Gap Analysis and Detailed Plan), Draft Report, NAS/TRB/ SHRP 2 R09. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Molenaar, K. 2005. Programmatic Cost Risk Analysis for Highway Megaprojects, ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 3, pp. 343â353. Molenaar, K. R., J. E. Diekmann, and D. B. Ashley. 2006. Guide to Risk Assessment and Allocation for Highway Construction Management. Report FHWA-PL-06-032. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Roberds, W. 1990. Methods for Developing Defensible Subjective Probability Assessments. In Transportation Research Record 1288, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 183â190.
132 GUIDE FOR THE PROCESS OF MANAGING RISK ON RAPID RENEWAL PROJECTS Roberds, W., and T. McGrath. 2006. Quantitative Cost and Schedule Risk Assessment and Management for Large Infrastructure Projects. Proc., PMI College of Scheduling 3rd Annual Conference: Scheduling the Next Generation, Orlando, Fla. Transportation Research Board (TRB). 2009. Special Report 296: Implementing the Results of the Second Strategic Highway Research Program: Saving Lives, Reducing Congestion, Improving Quality of Life. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Washington State Department of Transportation. 2006. Cost Estimate Validation Process (CEVP®) and Cost Risk Assessment (CRA). http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/ projectmgmt/ riskassessment. Accessed May 1, 2006.