National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Precision Statement for AASHTO T 180
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"Chapter 6 - Conclusions and Recommendations ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Precision Estimates of AASHTO T 180: Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) Drop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22906.
×
Page 24
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"Chapter 6 - Conclusions and Recommendations ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Precision Estimates of AASHTO T 180: Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) Drop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22906.
×
Page 25

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

22 CHAPTER 6- CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Summary This study was conducted to prepare precision estimates for AASHTO T180, “Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) Drop.” An interlaboratory study (ILS) was conducted to collect data from testing four aggregate -soil blends that were found suitable for construction of base and subbase. In addition, the data from the three most recent rounds of AMRL Soil Classification and Compaction Proficiency Sample Program were utilized to compute precision estimates. The four blends in the ILS, included two coarse- and two fine-grained soil-aggregate mixtures that were prepared according to Grading A and Grading E of AASHTO M147, “Materials for Aggregate and Soil-Aggregate Subbase, Base, and Surface Courses.” Each of the blends had less than 10% material passing #200 sieve opening to represent suitable base and subbase materials. The materials used for PSP included three sets of lean clay with sand with each blend having about 85% materials passing #200 sieve opening. Since the materials used for the ILS and PSP samples were very different, the developed precision estimates cover a wide range of maximum densities and optimum moisture contents. The following presents a summary of the findings: • The average maximum density of the fine-graded blends was significantly smaller than those of coarse-graded blends. However, the standard deviations of the maximum density of the fine and coarse graded blends were the same. Therefore, the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations of the maximum dry density of the ILS blends were combined. • The average optimum moisture content of the fine-graded blends is significantly larger than those of coarse-graded blends. However, the standard deviations of the optimum moisture content of the fine and coarse blends were the same. Therefore, the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations of optimum moisture content of the ILS blends were combined. • The average maximum density of the ILS blends was significantly larger than that of PSP blends. In addition, the pooled standard deviations of maximum dry density from PSP were significantly smaller than those of ILS. Therefore, the standard deviations from the two sources were presented separately in the precision statement of AASHTO T180. • The average optimum moisture content of the ILS blends was significantly smaller than that of PSP. In addition, the pooled standard deviations of optimum moisture content from PSP were significantly larger than those of ILS. Therefore, the standard deviations from the two sources were presented separately in the precision statement of AASHTO T180. 6.2 Conclusions Based on the results of AASHTO T180 interlaboratory study and AMRL Soil

23 Classification and Compaction Proficiency Sample Program data a precision statement was prepared. Since the difference between the precision of maximum density and optimum moisture content from ILS and PSP were significantly different, the Sr and SR 6.3 Recommendations estimates computed from the two sources were presented separately in the prepared precision statement. The proposed precision statement is provided in Appendix E of this report. The design and control of compaction of soils is an important aspect of a pavement construction process. The level of accuracy in which a degree of compaction of soil-aggregate mixture is measured has a significant effect on the performance of a pavement as a whole. Currently, there are no precision estimates that would define the accuracy requirements for measuring maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the soil-aggregate blends compacted according to AASHTO T 180. Therefore, it is recommended that the precision statement in Appendix E, which is prepared based on analysis of the data collected through an interlaboratory study and from the three most recent rounds of AMRL Soil classification and Compaction Proficiency Sample Program to be published in AASHTO T180 test method.

Next: References »
Precision Estimates of AASHTO T 180: Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) Drop Get This Book
×
 Precision Estimates of AASHTO T 180: Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) Drop
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 168: Precision Estimates of AASHTO T 180: Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) Drop explores an interlaboratory study and data mining of the proficiency sample program to prepare precision estimates for American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) T180 test method used for determining the relationship between the moisture content and density of soil materials.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!