National Academies Press: OpenBook

Utility Location and Highway Design (2010)

Chapter: Bibliography

« Previous: References
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Utility Location and Highway Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22957.
×
Page 24
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Utility Location and Highway Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22957.
×
Page 25
Page 26
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Utility Location and Highway Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22957.
×
Page 26

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

BIBLIOGRAPHY A Guide for Accommodating Utilities within Highway Right- of-Way, American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2005 Anspach, J.H., “Avoiding Utility Relocations,” Proceedings of the International Right of Way Association Annual Meet- ing, Austin, Tex., 2003. Anspach, J.H., “New National Utility Standards & Guidelines from AASHTO, ASCE, and FHWA,” Proceedings of the New Jersey Transportation Quality Initiative Conference, Atlantic City, N.J., 2004. A Policy on the Accommodation of Utilities within the Free- way Right-of-Way, American Association of State High- way and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2005. Arcand, L. and H. Osman, “Utilization of Subsurface Utility Engineering to Improve the Effectiveness of Utility Relo- cation and Coordination Efforts on Highway Projects in Ontario,” Annual Conference and Exhibition of the Trans- portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, ON, 2006, 15 pp. Arcand, L. and H. Osman, Utilization of Subsurface Utility Engineering to Improve the Effectiveness of Utility Relo- cation and Coordination Efforts on Highway Projects in Ontario, prepared for the 2006 Annual Transportation Asso- ciation of Canada, Charlottetown, PE. Bercha, F., Study of Natural Gas Pipelines in Rural Road Rights-of-Way, Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Mar. 2001. Berliner, H.L., A.M. Fleres, and K.E. Kauffman, Trans- portation Research E-Circular E-C112: Construction of the Newark City Subway Broad Street Extension, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 326–336. Best Practices for Utility-Based Data, A Best Practice by the National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003 [Online]. Available: http://sustainablecommunities.fcm.ca/ Infraguide/Integrated_Infrastructure.asp [accessed June 19, 2007]. Beyer, B.J., N.M. Zembillas, and V. LaVallette, “Proactive Utilities Management: Conflict Analysis and Subsurface Utility Engineering,” presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 12–16, 2003. Blair, J.S., “Utility Relocations on Construction Projects: A Contractors Perspective,” 89th Annual Purdue Road School, West Lafayette, Ind., 2003, 6 pp. Britton, D., “Do the Right Thing in the Public Right-of-Way,” APWA Reporter, Vol. 72, No. 9, pp. 66–68. Caldas, C.H., T. Le, G.E. Gibson, Jr., and M. Thole, Identify- ing Right-of-Way Requirements during the Project Devel- opment Process, Report FHWA/TX-08/0-5478-1; Report No. 0-5478-1, Federal Highway Administration, Texas Department of Transportation, University of Texas, Austin, 2007, 224 pp. Chou, C.-C., C.H. Caldas, and J.T. O’Connor, “Decision Support System for Combined Transportation and Utility Construction Strategy,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1994, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 9–16. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Part 645 [retrieved Mar. 14, 2005]. Code of Practice for Working in the Road, SNZ HB 2002: 2003, Standards New Zealand, Wellington. Collier, N.O. and S.C. Kranc, “Optimizing Facilities Place- ment and Automating Permit Process for Improved Utility Corridor Development, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1984, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 151–158. Electronic Document Technologies Implementation and Sup- port (EDTIS): Content Services Library Standards, Ver- sion 3.4, Information Systems Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Jan. 2006. Ellis, R., Development of Improved Strategies for Avoiding Utility Related Delays During FDOT Highway Construction Projects, Federal Highway Administration, Florida Depart- ment of Transportation, University of Florida, Gainesville, 2003, 92 pp. Ellis, R.D., Z. Herbsman, and R. McKenzie, Best Management Practices for Managing Utility Conflicts on FDOT Con- struction Projects, Report No. FL/DOT 99700-3506-119, Florida Department of Transportation and Federal High- way Administration, Tallahassee, Fla., 1996. Ellis, R.D. and H.R. Thomas, “The Root Causes of Delays in Highway Construction,” presented at the 81st Annual Meet- ing of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 13–17, 2002. European Right-of-Way and Utilities Best Practices, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2002. Goodrum, P.M., F. Kari, A. Smith, B. Slaughter, and C.N. Jones, An Analysis of the Direct and Indirect Costs of Utility and Right-of-Way Conflicts on Construction Road- way Projects, Federal Highway Administration, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, University of Kentucky, Lexington, 2006, 198 pp. Goodwin, A., “Design-Build Cuts Street-Widening Project Time,” Better Roads, Vol. 74, No. 2, 2004, pp. 42–45. Gruber, A. and M. Ramos, “Coordinating the Relocation of Large Diameter Water Lines for the Widening of IH-10,” Pipelines 2004: What’s on the Horizon? ASCE, San Diego, Calif., 2004, 6 pp. Guidance on Sharing Freeway and Highway Rights-of-Way for Telecommunications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1996. 24

25 Hemstock, J., Management of Utilities in and Adjacent to the Public Right-of-Way: Survey of Practices, Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, ON, 2008. “Highway Design 2008,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2060, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, 180 pp. Huber, P.K. and J.H. Anspach, “Construction Benefits Result- ing from Using ASCE/CI 38-02,” New Pipeline Technolo- gies, Security, and Safety, Proceedings of the ASCE Annual Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction, San Diego, Calif., 2003, Vol. 2, pp. 1406–1414. Huber, F.W., J.H. Anspach, and R.C. Persad, “Pipeline Relo- cation Design Utilizing C/I ASCE 38-02,” New Pipeline Technologies, Security and Safety, Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Con- struction, San Diego, Calif., 2003, Vol. 2, pp. 1415–1421. Huber, F.W. and J.H. Anspach, “Reducing Uncertainty in Subsurface Utility Construction,” Proceedings of the ASCE Pipeline Annual Conference, San Diego, Calif., 2004. Kranc, S.C., A. Yalcin, A. Tsalatsanis, and N.O. Collier, The Efficacy of Utility Database Management, University of South Florida, Tampa, 2007, 149 pp. Kranc, S.C., et al., Optimum Placement of Utilities Within FDOT R/W, University of South Florida, Tampa, 2005, 112 pp. Kraus, E., C. Quiroga, R. Brown, C. Stevens, and N. Koncz, Development of a Utility Conflict Management Tool, Report FHWA/TX-07.0-5475-1; Report 0-5474-1, Federal High- way Administration, Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Transportation Institute, San Antonio, 2007, 102 pp. Kraus, E., C. Quiroga, and J. Le, “Development of a Tool for Utility Conflict Data Management in the Project Develop- ment Process,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2060, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 153–161. Lindly, J.K., “Outsourcing Utility Coordination: Who, Where, and Why?” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2025, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washing- ton, D.C., 2007, pp. 137–140. Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure, Draft Seed Document S250-07, May 2007, Canadian Standards Asso- ciation, Mississauga, ON. Marti, M.M., K.L. Knutson, and J. Corkle, Utility Relocation: A Communication and Coordination Process for Local Gov- ernments, Minnesota Department of Transportation, SRF Consulting Group, Minneapolis, 2002, 40 pp. Martin, J. and F.T. Najafi, “Management Strategies for Utility Relocation and Joint Use in Highway Right-of- Way,” presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Trans- portation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 11–15, 2004. Moeller, R., et al., European Right-of-Way and Utilities Best Practices, Report pl 02 013, Aug. 2002, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://international.fhwa.dot.gov/ eurorightofway/index.htm [accessed June 19, 2007]. Najafi, F.T. and L. Millman, “Survey of Utility Companies in Assessing Utility Relocation and Joint Use in Highway Right-of-Way,” 85th Annual Meeting of the Transporta- tion Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 22–26, 2006. Najafi, F.T. and J. Martin, “Design-Build Approach for Utility Relocations in Highway Right-of-Way,” 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 22–26, 2006. New Pipeline Technologies, Security, and Safety, Pipeline Planning Utilizing C/I ASCE 38-02, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., 2003, pp. 1406–1414. O’Connor, J.T., C.H. Caldas, C.-C. Chou, A. Stroka, and G.K. Goldman, Effectiveness of the Combined Transporta- tion and Utility Construction Strategy, Federal Highway University Administration, Texas Department of Trans- portation, Austin, 2007, 198 pp. Program Guide—Utility Relocation and Accommodation on Federal-Aid Highway Projects, 6th ed., Office of Pro- gram Administration, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2003. Project Development Process Manual, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2003. Proulx, C.R. and G.N. Young, “Achieving a More Complete View of the Subsurface with 3D Underground Imaging,” 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 13–17, 2008, 9 pp. Quiroga, C., C.D. Ellis, and S.-Y. Shin, “Integrated Plat- form for Managing Utilities Along Highway Corridors,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transpor- tation Research Board, No. 1768, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 233–241. Quiroga, C., C. Ellis, S.-Y. Shin, and R. Pina, A Data Plat- form for Managing Utilities Along Highway Corridors, Report FHWA/TX-02/2110-1; Research Report 2110-1; TTI: 0-2110, Federal Highway Administration, Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Transportation Insti- tute, Washington, D.C., 2002, 88 pp. Quiroga, C. and R. Pina, “Issues in Automating Utility Permits at Transportation Agencies,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1890, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 143–151. Quiroga, C. and R. Pina, “Utilities in Highway Right-of- Way: Data Needs and Modeling,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1851, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 133–142. Quiroga, C., K. Hamad, and E. Kraus, Inventory of Utilities Summary Report, Texas Transportation Institute/Federal Highway Administration, College Station, 2008. Scott, C.P., “Avoiding Utilities-Related Project Delays,” TR News, No. 253, 2007, p. 8. Snead, S., “RUMS—Right-of-Way Tracking,” Public Roads, Vol. 68, No. 4, 2005, pp. 24–27.

Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Exist- ing Subsurface Utility Data, CI ASCE 38-02, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., 2002. Sterling, R., et al., Encouraging Innovation in Locating and Characterizing Buried Utilities for U.S. Transportation Projects, 12th International Conference on Ground Pene- trating Radar, Birmingham, United Kingdom, June 16–19, 2008. Texas Administrative Code, Title 43, Part 1, Chapter 21, Subchapter C. [retrieved Mar. 14, 2005]. Thorne, J., D. Turner, and J. Lindly, Highway/Utility Guide, Report FHWA-SA-93-049, American Public Works Asso- ciation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1993, 298 pp. Transportation Infrastructure: Impacts of Utility Relocations on Highway and Bridge Projects, GAO/RCED/99-131; 26 B-280707, U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C., 1999. Utility Manual, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2004, 233 pp. Worlton, M.A. and B. Squire, “Keys to Successful Utility Coordination,” Pipelines 2004: What’s on the Horizon? ASCE, San Diego, Calif., 2004, 4 pp. Zembillas, N.M., “Subsurface Utility Engineering: A Tech- nology-Driven Process that Results in Increased Safety, Fewer Design Changes, and Lower Costs,” First Interna- tional Symposium on Transportation and Development, Beijing, China, 2008. Zembillas, N.M. and B.J. Beyer, “Proactive Utilities Manage- ment: Conflict Analysis and Subsurface Utility Engineer- ing,” Pipelines 2004: What’s on the Horizon? ASCE, San Diego, Calif., 2004, 6 pp.

Next: Appendix A - Subsurface Utility Engineering versus One-Call »
Utility Location and Highway Design Get This Book
×
 Utility Location and Highway Design
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 405: Utility Location and Highway Design explores current practices in use by transportation agencies for consideration of utilities during the project development process, including where in the process the utility impacts are assessed and relocation decisions made; what policies, regulations, manuals, and guidelines are used; and how design decisions are influenced by utilities.

Appendices D and E for NCHRP Synthesis 405 are available online.

Appendix D – Collated United States Survey Results

Appendix E – Collated Canadian Survey Results

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!