Using the Results of Contractor-Performed Tests in Quality Assurance: Contractor's Final Report (2007)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

183 APPENDICES

APPENDIX A PLOTS OF GEORGIA DOT AND CONTRACTOR HOT MIXED ASPHALT CONCRETE PROJECT MEANS AND VARIANCES

-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Project GDOT QA Mean (%) P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r M e a n Q C T ( % ) Figure A.1. Asphalt Content Project Means – Georgia DOT QA and Contractor QC 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 Project GDOT QA Variance (%) P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e ( % ) Figure A.2. Asphalt Content Project Variances – Georgia DOT QA and Contractor QC Figure A.3. Asphalt Content Project Means – Paired Georgia DOT Comparison and Contractor QC. Figure A.4. Asphalt Content Project Variances – Paired Georgia DOT Comparison and Contractor QC. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 Project GDOT Comaprison Variance (%) P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e ( % )

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Project GDOT QA Means (%) P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s ( % ) Figure A.5. Percent Passing the ½” Sieve Project Means – Georgia DOT QA and Contractor QC. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Project GDOT QA Variance (%) P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e ( % ) Figure A.6. Percent Passing the ½” Sieve Project Variances – Georgia DOT QA and Contractor QC. Figure A.7. Percent Passing the ½” Sieve Project Means - Paired Georgia DOT Comparison and Contractor QC 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Project GDOT Comparison Variance (%) P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e ( % ) Figure A.8. Percent Passing the ½” Sieve Project Variances - Paired Georgia DOT Comparison and Paired Contractor QC.

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Project GDOT QA Mean (%) P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n ( % ) Figure A.9. Percent Passing the #200 Sieve Project Means – Georgia QA and Contractor QC. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Project GDOT QA Variance (%) P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e ( % ) Figure A.10. Percent Passing the #200 Sieve Project Variances – Georgia QA and Contractor QC. -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Project GDOT Comparison Mean (%) P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s ( % ) Figure A.11. Percent Passing the #200 Sieve Project Means - Georgia DOT Paired Comparison and Contractor QC 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Project GDOT Comparison Variance (%) P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e ( % ) Figure A.12. Percent Passing the #200 Sieve Project Variances - Georgia DOT Paired Comparison and Contractor QC

APPENDIX B PLOTS OF FLORIDA DOT AND CONTRACTOR HOT MIXED ASPHALT CONCRETE PROJECT MEANS AND VARIANCES

% AC Means -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 -0.400 -0.300 -0.200 -0.100 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.1. Asphalt Content Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC % AC Variance 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.2. Asphalt Content Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Air Void Means -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.3. Air Void Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Air Void Variance 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.4. Air Void Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

% Gmm Means -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.5. % Gmm Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC %Gmm Variances 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Project FLDOT VT Variance s P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.6. % Gmm Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC VMA Means -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.7. VMA Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC VMA Variance 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.8. VMA Project Variance – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Gmm Mean (Actual Values) 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.55 2.6 2.65 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.55 2.6 2.65 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.9. Gmm Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Gmm Variances (Actual Values) 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.10. Gmm Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Gmb Mean (Actual Values) 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.11. Gmb Project Means - Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Gmb Variances (Actual Values) 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.12. Gmb Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Gmb Cores 1-5 Mean 2.1 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.1 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.13. Gmb Cores 1-5 Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Gmb Cores 1-5 Variances 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 Project FLDOT VT Variance s P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.14. Gmb Cores 1-5 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve #1/2 Means -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.15. Sieve #1/2 Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 1/2 Variances 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.16. Sieve #1/2 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Sieve # 3/8 Means -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.17. Sieve #3/8 Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 3/8 Variances 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.18. Sieve #3/8 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 4 Means -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.19. Sieve #4 Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 4 Variances 0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.20. Sieve #4 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Sieve # 8 Means -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.21. Sieve #8 Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 8 Variances 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 -4 1 6 11 16 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.22. Sieve #8 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 16 Means -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 Project FLDOT VT M eans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.23. Sieve #16 Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 16 Variances 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.24. Sieve #16 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Sieve # 30 Means -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.25. Sieve #30 Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 30 Variances 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 -2 3 8 13 18 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.26. Sieve #30 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 50 Means -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.27. Sieve #50 Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 50 Variances 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.28. Sieve #50 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Sieve # 100 Means -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.29. Sieve #100 Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 100 Variances 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.30. Sieve #100 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 200 Means -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.31. Sieve #200 Project Means – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 200 Variances 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.32. Sieve #200 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

% AC Means -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Project FLDOT IV Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.33. Asphalt Content Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC % AC Variance 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.34. Asphalt Content Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Air Void Means -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Project FLDOT IV Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.35. Air Void Project Means – Florida DOT IV and contractor QC Air Void Variance 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 1 2 3 4 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.36. Air Void Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC

% Gmm Means -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Project FLDOT IV M eans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.37. % Gmm Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC %Gmm Variances 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.38. % Gmm Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC VMA Means -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 -2 -1 0 1 2 Project FLDOT IV M eans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.39. VMA Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC VMA Variance 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.40. VMA Project Variances Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC

Gmm Mean (Actual Values) 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.55 2.6 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.55 2.6 Project FLDOT IV Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.41. Gmm Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Gmm Variances (Actual Values) 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.42. Gmm Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Gmb Mean (Actual Values) 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.15 2.25 2.35 2.45 Proje ct FLDOT IV M eans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.43. Gmb Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Gmb Variances (Actual Values) 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.44. Gmb Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC

Gmb Cores 1-5 Mean 2.1 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.1 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 Project FLDOT IV Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.45. Gmb Cores 1-5 Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Gmb Cores 1-5 Variances 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.46. Gmb Cores 1-5 Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve #1/2 Means -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Project FLDOT IV Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.47. Sieve #1/2 Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 1/2 Variances 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.48. Sieve #1/2 Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC

Sieve # 3/8 Means -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Project FLDOT IV M eans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.49. Sieve #3/8 Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 3/8 Variances 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.50. Sieve #3/8 Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 4 Means -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 Project FLDOT IV Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.51. Sieve #4 Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 4 Variances 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.52. Sieve #4 Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC

Sieve # 8 Means -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Project FLDOT IV Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.53. Sieve #8 Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 8 Variances 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.54. Sieve #8 Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 16 Means -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 -10 -5 0 5 10 Project FLDOT IV Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.55. Sieve #16 Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor Qc Sieve # 16 Variances 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.56. Sieve #16 Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC

Sieve # 30 Means -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Project FLDOT IV Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.57. Sieve #30 Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 30 Variances 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.58. Sieve #30 Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 50 Means -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Project FLDOT IV Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.59. Sieve #50 Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 50 Variances 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.60. Sieve #50 Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC

Sieve # 100 Means -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Project FLDOT IV M eans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.61. Sieve #100 Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 100 Variances 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.62. Sieve #100 Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 200 Means -1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 -1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Project FLDOT IV M eans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.63. Sieve #200 Project Means – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC Sieve # 200 Variances 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Project FLDOT IV Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.64. Sieve #200 Project Variances – Florida DOT IV and Contractor QC

% AC Means (Paired tests) -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.65. Asphalt Content Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC % AC Variance (Paired tests) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.66. Asphalt Content Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Air Void Means (Paired tests) -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.67. Air Void Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Air Void Variance (Paired Tests) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.68. Air Void Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

% Gmm Means (Paired Tests) -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.69. % Gmm Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC %Gmm Variances (Paired Tests) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.70. % Gmm Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC VMA Means (Paired Tests) -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.71. VMA Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC VMA Variance (Paired Tests) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.72. VMA Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Gmm Means (Actual Values), Paired Tests 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.55 2.6 2.65 2.25 2.35 2.45 2.55 2.65 Project FLDOT VT M eans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.73. Gmm Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Gmm Variances (Acutal Values), Paired Tests 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.74. Gmm Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Gmb Mean (Actual Values), Paired Tests 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.15 2.25 2.35 2.45 Project FLDOT VT M eans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.75. Gmb Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Gmb Variances (Actual Values) , Paired Tests 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.76. Gmb Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Gmb Cores 1-5 Mean (Paired Tests) 2.1 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 2.1 2.15 2.2 2.25 2.3 2.35 2.4 2.45 2.5 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.77. Gmb Cores 1-5 Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Gmb Cores 1-5 Variances (Paired Tests) 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.78. Gmb Cores 1-5 Project Variances – Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve #1/2 Means (Paired Tests) -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.79. Sieve #1/2 Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 1/2 Variances (Paired Tests) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.80. Sieve #1/2 Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Sieve # 3/8 Means (Paired Tests) -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.81. Sieve #3/8 Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 3/8 Variances (Paired Tests) 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.82. Sieve #3/8 Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 4 Means (Paired Tests) -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.83. Sieve #4 Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 4 Variances (Paired Tests) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.84. Sieve #4 Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Sieve # 8 Means (Paired Tests) -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.85. Sieve #8 Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 8 Variances (Paired Tests) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.86. Sieve #8 Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 16 Means (Paired Tests) -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 Project FLDOT VT M eans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.87. Sieve #16 Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 16 Variances (Paired Tests) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.88. Sieve #16 Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Sieve # 30 Means (Paired Tests) -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.89. Sieve #30 Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 30 Variances (Paired Tests) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 -2 3 8 13 18 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.90. Sieve #30 Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 50 Means (Paired Tests) -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Project FLDOT VT Means P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.91. Sieve #50 Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 50 Variances (Paired Tests) 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.92. Sieve #50 Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

Sieve # 100 Means (Paired Tests) -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Project FLDOT VT Me ans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.93. Sieve #100 Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 100 Variances (Paired Tests) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.94. Sieve #100 Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 200 Means (Paired Tests) -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Project FLDOT VT Me ans P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure B.95. Sieve #200 Project Means – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC Sieve # 200 Variances (Paired Tests) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 Project FLDOT VT Variances P r o j e c t C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure B.96. Sieve #200 Project Variances – Paired Florida DOT VT and Contractor QC

APPENDIX C PLOTS OF NORTH CAROLINA DOT AND CONTRACTOR HOT MIXED ASPHALT CONCRETE JOB MIX FORMULA MEANS AND VARIANCES

A sph a l t C o n t e nt M e a n -0.55 -0.45 -0.35 -0.25 -0.15 -0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.55 -0.55 -0.45 -0.35 -0.25 -0.15 -0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.55 J M F NC D OT QA M e ans Figure C.1. Asphalt Content JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC Asphalt Content Variance 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 JMF NCDOT QA Variances J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure C.2. Asphalt Content JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC %VT M M e a n -1.8 -1.3 -0.8 -0.3 0.2 0.7 1.2 1.7 -1.8 -1.3 -0.8 -0.3 0.2 0.7 1.2 1.7 J M F NC D OT QA M e ans Figure C.3. % VTM JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC %VTM Variance 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 JMF NCDOT QA Variances J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure C.4. % VTM JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC

%VMA Mean -13.5 -11.5 -9.5 -7.5 -5.5 -3.5 -1.5 0.5 2.5 4.5 6.5 8.5 10.5 12.5 -13.5 -11.5 -9.5 -7.5 -5.5 -3.5 -1.5 0.5 2.5 4.5 6.5 8.5 10.5 12.5 JMF NCDOT QA Means J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure C.5. % VMA JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC %VMA Variance 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 JMF NCDOT QA Variances J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure C.6. % VMA JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC %Gmm Mean -4.5 -3.5 -2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 -4.5 -3.5 -2.5 -1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 JMF NCDOT QA Means J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure C.7. % Gmm JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC %Gmm Variance 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 JMF NCDOT QA Variances J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure C.8. % Gmm JMF Variances – North Carolina QA and Contractor QC

0 . 0 7 5 m m M e a n -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 JM F N C D OT QA M ea ns Figure C.9. 0.075 mm JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC 0.075 mm Variance 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 JMF NCDOT QA Variances J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure C.10. 0.075 mm JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC 2 . 3 6 m m M e a n -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JM F N C D OT QA M ea ns Figure C.11. 2.36 mm JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC 2 . 3 6 m m Va r i a n c e 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 J M F N CD OT QA V a r i anc es Figure C.12. 2.36 mm JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC

4.75 mm Mean -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JMF NCDOT QA Means J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure C.13. 4.75 mm JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC 4.75 mm Variance 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 JMF NCDOT QA Variances J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure C.14. 4.75 mm JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC 9 . 5 m m M e a n -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JM F N C D OT QA M ea ns Figure C.15. 9.5 mm JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC 9 . 5 m m Va r i a nc e 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 JM F N C D OT QA V ar i a nce s Figure C.16. 9.5 mm JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC

12 . 5 m m M e a n -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 JM F N C D OT QA M ea ns Figure C.17. 12.5 mm JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC 12 . 5 m m Va r i a n c e 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 JM F N C D OT QA V a r i a nce s Figure C.18. 12.5 mm JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC 19 . 0 m m M e a n -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 J M F NC D OT QA M e ans Figure C.19. 19.0 mm JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC 19 . 0 m m Va r i a n c e 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 JM F N C D OT QA V a r i a nce s Figure C.20. 19.0 mm JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC

25.0 mm Mean -5.25 -4.25 -3.25 -2.25 -1.25 -0.25 0.75 1.75 2.75 3.75 4.75 -5.25 -4.25 -3.25 -2.25 -1.25 -0.25 0.75 1.75 2.75 3.75 4.75 JMF NCDOT QA Means J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C M e a n s Figure C.21. 25.0 mm JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC 2 5 . 0 m m Va r i a n c e 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 J M F NC D OT QA V a r i anc es Figure C.22. 25.0 mm JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC %VFA M e a n -17 -15 -13 -11 -9 -7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 -17 -15 -13 -11 -9 -7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 J M F NC D OT QA M e ans Figure C.23. % VFA JMF Means – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC %VFA Variance 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 JMF NCDOT QA Variances J M F C o n t r a c t o r Q C V a r i a n c e s Figure C.24. % VFA JMF Variances – North Carolina DOT QA and Contractor QC

APPENDIX D PLOTS OF CALTRAN AND CONTRACTOR HOT MIXED ASPHALT CONCRETE PROJECT MEANS AND VARIANCES

Asphalt Content Mean -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Caltrans Verification - Means (%) C o n t r a c t o r Q C - M e a n s ( % ) Figure D.1. Asphalt Content Project Means – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC Asphalt Content Variances 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 Caltrans Verification - Variances (%) C o n t r a c t o r - V a r i a n c e s ( % ) Figure D.2. Asphalt Content Project Variances – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC 19 or 12.5 mm Means -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 Caltrans Verification - Means (%) C o n t r a c t o r Q C - M e a n s ( % ) Figure D.3. ¾” or ½” Sieve Project Means – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC 19 or 12.5 mm Variances 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Caltrans Verification - Variances (%) C o n t r a c t o r - V a r i a n c e s ( % ) Figure D.4. ¾” or ½” Sieve Project Variances – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC

9.5 mm Means -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 Caltrans Verification - Means (%) C o n t r a c t o r Q C - M e a n s ( % ) Figure D.5. 3/8” Sieve Project Means – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC 9.5 mm Variances 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Caltrans Verification - Variances (%) C o n t r a c t o r - V a r i a n c e s ( % ) Figure D.6. 3/8” Sieve Project Variances – Verification and Contractor QC 4.75 mm Means -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Caltrans Verification - Means (%) C o n t r a c t o r Q C - M e a n s ( % ) Figure D.7. #4 Sieve Project Means – Verification and Contractor QC 4.75 mm Variances 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 Caltrans Verification - Variances (%) C o n t r a c t o r - V a r i a n c e s ( % ) Figure D.8. #4 Sieve Project Variances – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC

2.36 mm Means -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Caltrans Verification - Means (%) C o n t r a c t o r Q C - M e a n s ( % ) Figure D.9. #8 Sieve Project Means – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC 2.36 mm Variances 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 Caltrans Verification - Variances (%) C o n t r a c t o r - V a r i a n c e s ( % ) Figure D.10. #8 Sieve Variances – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC 600 um Means -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Caltrans Verification - Means (%) C o n t r a c t o r Q C - M e a n s ( % ) Figure D.11. #30 Sieve Project Means – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC 600 um Variances 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 Caltrans Verification - Variances (%) C o n t r a c t o r - V a r i a n c e s ( % ) Figure D.12. #30 Sieve Project Means – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC

75 um Means -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Caltrans Verification - Means (%) C o n t r a c t o r Q C - M e a n s ( % ) Figure D.13. #200 Sieve Project Means – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC 75 um Variances 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Caltrans Verification - Variances (%) C o n t r a c t o r - V a r i a n c e s ( % ) Figure D.14. #200 Sieve Project Variances – Caltrans Verification and Contractor QC

APPENDIX E PLOTS OF FHWA-WFLHD AND CONTRACTOR GRANULAR BASE PROJECT MEANS AND VARIANCES

12.5mm Sieve -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 FHWA Diff. from Target C o n t r a c t o r D i f f . f r o m t a r g e t Figure E.1. Percent Passing ½” Sieve Project Means – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC 12.5mm Sieve 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 FHWA Variance (of Diff. from Target) C o n t r a c t o r V a r i a n c e ( o f D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t ) Figure E.2. Percent Passing ½” Sieve Project Variances – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC 3/8" Sieve -2 0 2 4 6 8 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FHWA Diff. from target C o n t r a c t o r D i f f . f r o m t a r g e t Figure E.3. Percent Passing 3/8” Sieve Project Means – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC 3/8" Sieve 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 FHWA Variance (of Diff. from Target) C o n t r a c t o r V a r i a n c e ( o f D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t ) Figure E.4. Percent Passing 3/8” Sieve Project Variances – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC

#4 Sieve -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 FHWA Diff. from Target C o n t r a c t o r D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t Figure E.5. Percent Passing #4 Sieve Project Means – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC #4 Sieve 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 FHWA Variance (of Diff. from Target) C o n t r a c t o r V a r i a n c e ( o f D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t ) Figure E.6. Percent Passing #4 Sieve Project Variances – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC #10 Sieve -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 FHWA Diff. from Target C o n t r a c t o r D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t Figure E.7. Percent Passing #10 Sieve Project Means – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC #10 Sieve 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 FHWA Variance (of Diff. from Target) C o n t r a c t o r V a r i a n c e ( o f D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t ) Figure E.8. Percent Passing #10 Sieve Project Variances – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC

#40 Sieve -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 FHWA Diff. from Target C o n t r a c t o r D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t Figure E.9. Percent Passing #40 Sieve Project Means – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC #40 Sieve 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FHWA Variance (of Diff. from Target) C o n t r a c t o r V a r i a n c e ( o f D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t ) Figure E.10. Percent Passing #40 Sieve Project Variances – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC #200 Sieve -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 FHWA Mean Difference from Target C o n t r a c t o r M e a n D i f f e r e n c e f r o m T a r g e t Figure E.11. Percent Passing #200 Sieve Project Means – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC #200 Sieve 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 FHWA Variance (of Diff. from Target) C o n t r a c t o r V a r i a n c e ( o f D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t ) Figure E.12. Percent Passing #200 Sieve Project Variances – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC

LL Means -15 -10 -5 0 -15 -10 -5 0 FHWA Diff. from target C o n t r a c t o r D i f f . f r o m t a r g e t Figure E.13. Percent Passing LL Project Means – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC LL Variances 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FHWA Variance (of Diff. from Target) C o n t r a c t o r V a r i a n c e ( o f D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t ) Figure E.14. Percent Passing LL Project Variances – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC PI Means -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 FHWA Diff. from target C o n t r a c t o r D i f f . f r o m t a r g e t Figure E.15. Percent Passing PI Project Means – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC PI Variances 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 FHWA Variance (of Diff. from Target) C o n t r a c t o r V a r i a n c e ( o f D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t ) Figure E.16. Percent Passing PI Project Variances – FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC

Percent Fractured Faces Means 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 FHWA Diff. from target C o n t r a c t o r D i f f . f r o m t a r g e t Figure E.17. Percent Passing Fractured Faces Project Means - FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC Percent Fractured Faces Variances 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 FHWA Variance (of. Diff. from Target) C o n t r a c t o r V a r i a n c e ( o f D i f f . f r o m T a r g e t ) Figure E.18. Percent Passing Fractured Faces Project Variances - FHWA-WFLHD Verification and Contractor QC

APPENDIX F ACCEPTANCE OUTCOMES USING HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE STATISTICS FOR CALIFORNIA, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, KANSAS, AND NORTH CAROLINA

CALTRANS Asphalt Content Statistics s 2CAL = 0.087 s 2 CONT. = 0.042 s 2 are SD ∆ CAL = 0.036% ∆ CONT. = -0.003% ∆ are SD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 0.50% from targets Probability = 9.2% with Caltrans statistics Probability = 1.5% with contractor statistics 7.8% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with Caltrans statistics Percent Passing ¾ or ½ inch Sieve Statistics s 2CAL = 4.863 s 2 CONT. = 3.319 s 2 are SD ∆ CAL = 0.951% ∆ CONT. = 0.719% ∆ are SD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 5.0% from targets Probability = 3.7% with Caltrans statistics Probability = 1.0% with contractor statistics 2.7% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with Caltrans statistics Percent Passing 3/8 inch Sieve Statistics s 2CAL = 11.082 s 2 CONT. = 6.478 s 2 are SD ∆ CAL = -0.093% ∆ CONT. = -0.049% ∆ are NSD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 6.0% from targets Probability = 7.2% with Caltrans statistics Probability = 1.8% with contractor statistics 5.4% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with Caltrans statistics

Percent Passing #4 Sieve Statistics s 2CAL = 9.258 s 2 CONT. = 6.770 s 2 are SD ∆ CAL = -0.517% ∆ CONT. = -0.381% ∆ are NSD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 7.0% from targets Probability = 2.3% with Caltrans statistics Probability = 0.8% with contractor statistics 1.5% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with Caltrans statistics Percent Passing #8 Sieve Statistics s 2CAL = 8.303 s 2 CONT. = 5.423 s 2 are SD ∆ CAL = -0.356% ∆ CONT. = 0.012% ∆ are SD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 5.0% from targets Probability = 8.8% with Caltrans statistics Probability = 3.2% with contractor statistics 5.6% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with Caltrans statistics Percent Passing #30 Sieve Statistics s 2CAL = 5.363 s 2 CONT. = 6.386 s 2 are SD ∆ CAL = -0.058% ∆ CONT. = 0.234% ∆ are SD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 4.0% from targets Probability = 8.5% with Caltrans statistics Probability = 11.5% with contractor statistics -3.0% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with Caltrans statistics

Percent Passing #200 Sieve Statistics s 2CAL = 1.095 s 2 CONT. = 0.602 s 2 are SD ∆ CAL = 0.062% ∆ CONT. = 0.011% ∆ are NSD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 2.0% from targets Probability = 5.7% with Caltrans statistics Probability = 1.0% with contractor statistics 4.7% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with Caltrans statistics

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Asphalt Content Statistics s 2DOT = 0.084 s 2 CONT. = 0.062 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 0.016% ∆ CONT. = -0.012% ∆ are NSD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 0.40% from targets Probability = 16.9% with DOT statistics Probability = 10.9% with contractor statistics 6.0% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with DOT statistics Voids Content Statistics s 2DOT = 1.308 s 2 CONT. = 0.707 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = -0.289% ∆ CONT. = -0.248% ∆ are NSD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 1.4% from 4% target Probability = 23.5% with DOT statistics Probability = 11.0% with contractor statistics 12.5% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with DOT statistics Percent Passing Number 8 Sieve Statistics s 2DOT = 7.533 s 2 CONT. = 5.619 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 0.679% ∆ CONT. = 0.400% ∆ are NSD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 3.1% from targets Probability = 27.3% with DOT statistics Probability = 19.7% with contractor statistics 7.6% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with DOT statistics

Percent Passing Number 200 Sieve Statistics s 2DOT = 0.491 s 2 CONT. = 0.376 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 0.136% ∆ CONT. = 0.072% ∆ are NSD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 1.0% from targets Probability = 16.2% with DOT statistics Probability = 10.5% with contractor statistics 5.7% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with DOT statistics Mat Density – Coarse Mixes Statistics* s 2DOT = 2.958 s 2 CONT. = 2.570 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = -0.222% ∆ CONT. = -0.103% ∆ are NSD (p=0.014) Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 1.3% from 94.5% of Gmm target Probability = 45.4% with DOT statistics Probability = 41.8% with contractor statistics 3.6% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with DOT statistics Mat Density – Fine Mixes Statistics* s 2DOT = 2.958 s 2 CONT. = 2.570 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = -0.222% ∆ CONT. = -0.103% ∆ are NSD (p=0.014) Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits are -1.0% and +2.0% from 93% of Gmm target Probability = 42.4% with DOT statistics Probability = 38.2% with contractor statistics 4.2% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with DOT statistics * Statistics computed with test results from coarse and fine mixes combined.

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Asphalt Content Statistics s 2DOT = 0.064 s 2 CONT. = 0.040 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 0.004% ∆ CONT. = 0.005% ∆ are NSD Probability of pay < 100% Limit = 0.46% from targets for n=3* Probability = 0.9% with DOT statistics Probability = 0.1% with contractor statistics 0.8% greater chance for pay<100% with DOT statistics Percent Passing 1/2 inch Sieve** Statistics s 2DOT = 6.793 s 2 CONT. = 5.565 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 0.196% ∆ CONT. = 0.160% ∆ are NSD Probability of pay<100% Limit = 6.05% from targets for n=3* Probability = 0.1% with DOT statistics Probability ≈ 0% with contractor statistics 0.1% greater chance for pay<100% with DOT statistics Percent Passing 3/8 inch Sieve** Statistics s 2DOT = 6.605 s 2 CONT. = 6.044 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 0.246% ∆ CONT. = 0.231% ∆ are NSD Probability of pay<100% Limit = 4.90% from targets for n=3* Probability = 0.8% with DOT statistics Probability = 0.5% with contractor statistics 0.3% greater chance for pay<100% with DOT statistics

Percent Passing Number 4 Sieve** Statistics s 2DOT = 9.959 s 2 CONT. = 7.707 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 0.320% ∆ CONT. = 0.293% ∆ are NSD Probability of pay<100% Limit = 5.0% from targets for n=3* Probability = 4.3% with DOT statistics Probability = 1.6% with contractor statistics 2.7% greater chance for pay<100% with DOT statistics Percent Passing Number 8 Sieve** Statistics s 2DOT = 9.488 s 2 CONT. = 5.534 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 0.253% ∆ CONT. = 0.196% ∆ are NSD Probability of pay<100% Limit = 4.2% from targets for n=3* Probability = 13.9% with DOT statistics Probability = 1.6% with contractor statistics 12.3% greater chance for pay<100% with DOT statistics * Typical LOT pay adjustments based on about 3 samples. ** Limits used for gradation are averages of those specified for Superpave and SMA mixes.

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Voids Content Statistics s 2DOT = 0.643 s 2 CONT. = 0.318 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 0.322% ∆ CONT. = 0.262% ∆ are NSD Probability of exceeding upper or lower specification limits Limits = ± 1% from 4% target Probability = 24.9% with DOT statistics Probability = 11.0% with contractor statistics 13.9% greater chance of exceeding specification limits with DOT statistics Mat Density Statistics* s 2DOT = 3.016 s 2 CONT. = 1.674 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 1.429% ∆ CONT. = 1.642% ∆ are SD Probability of exceeding lower* specification limits (LSL) LSL = 92% of Gmm for mainline paving > 2 inches thick LSL = 91% of Gmm for mainline paving ≤ 2 inches thick LSL = 90% of Gmm for shoulder paving Probability = 20.5% with DOT statistics Probability = 10.2% with contractor statistics 10.3% greater chance of exceeding LSL with DOT statistics * Mat density is controlled with one sided limits, ie, only a minimum or lower limit is specified. Data from three types of paving were combined by using the variable ∆ = X-LSL.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Mat Density Statistics – Contractor and NCDOT Retest s 2DOT = 2.200 s 2 CONT. = 1.657 s 2 are SD ∆ DOT = 0.695% ∆ CONT. = 1.114% ∆ are SD Probability of exceeding 92% of Gmm minimum compaction requirement* Probability = 32.0% with DOT statistics Probability = 19.4% with contractor statistics 12.6% greater chance of exceeding minimum compaction requirements. * Pay reduction computed with equation, PF = 100-10(D)1.465, where D is the deficiency in compaction, i.e., less than 92%