Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
127 INTRODUCTION This appendix presents a summary of the data collected in the DOT DB guideline content analysis. Each row contains a phrase or idea that was looked for in each of the documents. When the word or idea was found, the column was marked. DESIGN-BUILD POLICY DOCUMENT CONTENT ANALYSIS The DB guideline content analysis is the combination of 17 DB guide- lines shown in Table E1 from the DOTs as follows: AK, AR, AZ, CO, FL, KS, MA, MN, MT, NC, NY, OH, SD, TX, UT, VA, and WA. This content analysis identified specific quality control/quality assurance criteria mentioned in the DB guidelines. It was performed as the RFP/RFQ content analysis outlined in Appendix D, except that it was not as detailed. For the most part, the DB guidelines are not comprehensive documents but general rules to be followed for DB projects in the specific states. It is interesting to note that two of the states, Arkansas and Kansas, from which guidelines were found, reported that they did not use DB in the general survey. New York reported that it would be using it in the future. Therefore, these guidelines were treated as untested during the final analysis. DESIGN-BUILD POLICY DOCUMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY Arizona Department of Transportation Intermodal Transportation Division, Design-Build Procurement and Administration Guide, 2nd ed., ADOT Construction Group, Phoenix, Dec. 2001 [On- line]. Available: http://www.azdot.gov/Highways/ConstGrp/ DesignBuildGuide.asp [accessed Jan. 24, 2007]. Arkansas Department of Transportation, Design-Build Guidelines and Procedures, Little Rock, April 2006. Colorado Department of Transportation, Design-Build Guidelines, Denver, Aug. 1, 1997. Colorado Department of Transportation, Design-Build Manual, Denver, Apr. 16, 2006, 46 pp. Florida Department of Transportation, Design-Build Guidelines, Tallahassee, Feb. 8, 2006. Kansas Department of Transportation, Design-Build Policy Guide Draft B, Topeka, n.d. Massachusetts Highway Department, Design Build Procurement Guide, Boston, Jan. 19, 2006. Montana Department of Transportation, Design-Build Guidelines, Helena, Mar. 1, 2004. New York State Department of Transportation, Design-Build Pro- cedures Manual, Vol. 1, Albany, Sep. 2005. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Design-Build Policy & Procedures, Raleigh, Jan. 6, 2000. Ohio Department of Transportation, Design-Build Manual and In- structions for Completing the Scope of Services Form, Colum- bus, Oct. 20, 2006. South Dakota Department of Transportation, Bureau of Adminis- tration Procedures for Design-Build Procurement of Department of Transportation Highway Construction Projects, Pierre, n.d. Virginia Department of Transportation Innovative Project Delivery Division, Design-Build Procurement Manual, Nov. 12, 2004, revised June 30, 2006 (draft format), Richmond, 2006. Washington State Department of Transportation, Guidebook for Design-Build Highway Project Development, Olympia, June 20, 2004. APPENDIX E Department of Transportation Design-Build Policy Document Content Analysis
128 Criteria No. States That Included Design-Build Guidelines Design in RFP (DOT furnished design) 13 AR, AZ, CO, FL, MA, MT, NY, NC, OH, SD, UT, VA, WA What Design Is Required in the Proposal (proposal design submittal) (design-builder furnished design) 14 AR, AZ, CO, FL, KS, MA, MT, NY, NC, SD, TX, UT, VA, WA Bridge Project Requirements 8 O, FL, KS, MT, NY, OH, UT, WA Roadway Project 8 O, FL, KS, MT, NY, OH, UT, WA Traffic Control 11 AR, CO, FL, MT, NY, NC, OH, SD, TX, VA, WA Railroad 9 AZ, FL, KS, MT, NY, NC, OH, UT, WA Utilities As-Builts 9 R, AZ, CO, FL, MT, NY, NC, OH, WA Permits 10 AR, AZ, CO, FL, MT, NY, NC, OH, VA, WA Survey Requirements 13 AR, AZ, CO, FL, MA, MT, NY, NC, OH, SD, TX, UT, WA Design Plans and Engineering Calculations Verification of Contract Compliance 10 AR, AZ, FL, MN, MT, NY, NC, TX, UT, WA Design Plans and Engineering Calculations Approval 0 Design/Construction Standard Specifications 12 AR, AZ, CO, FL, KS, MA, MT, NY, NC, TX, VA, WA Design Review (DB, DOT, or 3rd party) 13 AR, AZ, FL, KS, MA, MN, MT, NY, SD, TX, UT, VA, WA Request For Qualification (RFQ) 16 AR, AZ, CO, FL, KS, MA, MN, MT, NY, NC, OH, SD, TX, UT, VA, WA QA/QC Plan Included in Proposal 11 AR, AZ, CO, FL, MA, MN, NY, TX, UT, VA, WA After Award of Contract 0 Construction QC Responsibility 6 O, FL, KS, NC, TX, WA Construction QA Responsibility 7 O, FL, KS, NY, NC, TX, WA Quality Construction 4 MN, NY, UT, VA Design QC Responsibility 2 CO, WA Design QA Responsibility 3 CO, NY, WA Quality Design 5 Z, MA, MN, UT, VA Quality Assurance (QA) 7 R, MA, MN, MT, UT, VA, WA Quality Control (QC) 6 R, AZ, MA, MN, NY, UT Independent Assurance 10 AR, AZ, FL, MA, MN, MT, NY, NC, TX, WA Verification/Acceptance 11 AR, AZ, FL, KS, MA, MN, MT, NC, UT, VA, WA Quality Personnel Required 8 Z, CO, MA, MN, NY, TX, VA, WA Qualifications Listed 4 A, MN, TX, WA Progress Payments 14 AR, AZ, CO, FL, KS, MA, MN, MT, NY, NC, OH, UT, VA, WA Consulting Firm 10 AZ, CO, FL, KS, MA, MT, NY, OH, VA, WA Warranties 9 C C A C C A A A A M AR, CO, FL, MT, NY, TX, UT, VA, WA TABLE E1 DESIGN-BUILD POLICY DOCUMENT CONTENT ANALYSIS RESULTS
