Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
NCHRP 24-25 Page 83 Phase II Final Report 8. REFERENCES 1. Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation's Bridges, FHWA-PD-96-001 and Errata Sheet, Federal Highway Administration, 1995. 2. Richardson, E. V., and S. R. Davis. Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 4th ed. Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18, FHWA NHI 01-001. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., May, 2001. 3. National Institute of Science and Technology, and NEMATECH, Inc. How can you evaluate reliability from the "bottom-up" (component failure mode to system failure rate)? National Institute of Science and Technology, Gaithersburg MD. www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/apr/section1/apr18.htm. Accessed March 3, 2006. 4. Pearson, D., S. Stein, and J. S. Jones. HYRISK Methodology and Users Guide. Report FHWA-RD-02-XXX. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2002. 5. Office of Operations, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/documents/bts.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2005. 6. Moulton, L. K., H. V. S. GangaRao, and G. T. Halvorsen. Tolerable Movement Criteria for Highway Bridges. Report FHWA-RD-85-107. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D. C., 1985. 7. Webb, D. J., N. L. Anderson, T. Newton, S. Cardimona, and A. Ismail. Ground penetrating radar (GPR): a tool for monitoring bridge scour. In Application of innovative non-destructive methods to geotechnical and environmental investigation, (C. Anderson, and Newton, ed.). Report RDT-03-008. Missouri Department of Transportation, Rolla MO, April, 2003, pp. C1-C22. 8. Lagasse, P. F., L. W. Zevenbergen, J. D. Schall, and P. E. Clopper. Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures, 2nd ed. Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 23,
NCHRP 24-25 Page 84 Phase II Final Report FHWA NHI 01-003. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C., March 01, 2001. 9. Central Federal Lands Highway Division. Application of Geophysical Methods to Highway Related Problems. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., September 2003. www.cflhd.gov/geotechnical/. Accessed January 30, 2006. 10. Olson, L. D., F. Jalinoos, and M. F. Aouad. NCHRP Final Report 21-5: Determination of Unknown Subsurface Bridge Foundations. Federal Highway Administration, Washington D.C., August, 1995. 11. Olson, L. D., and M. F. Aouad. NCHRP Final Report 21-5 (2): Unknown Subsurface Bridge Foundation Testing. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., June, 2001. 12. Mason, R. R. Jr. and D. M Sheppard. Field Performance of an Acoustic Scour-Depth Monitoring System. Fundamentals and Advancements in Hydraulic Measurements and Experimentation Conference, Buffalo NY, August 1-5, 1994, pp. 366-375. 13. Hunt, B. E. and G. R. Price. Scour Monitoring â Lessons Learned. Keynote Paper in Second International Conference on SCOUR and EROSION ICSE-2. Singapore, November 14-17, 2004. 14. Haas, C., J. Weissmann, and T. Groll. Remote Bridge Scour Monitoring: A Prioritization and Implementation Guideline. Research Report 3970-1. University of Texas, San Antonio TX, 1999. 15. Schall, J. D., and G. R. Price. NCHRP Report 515: Portable Scour Monitoring Equipment. TRB, Washington, D.C., 2004.
NCHRP 24-25 Page 85 Phase II Final Report 16. Kuennen, T. Americaâs Quest for Premium Aggregates. Better Roads. James Information Media Inc., Des Plaines IA, 2004. www.betterroads.com/articles/aug04a.htm. Accessed March 5, 2006.