National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 8 - Summary and Conclusions
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"References and Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Comparing the Volumetric and Mechanical Properties of Laboratory and Field Specimens of Asphalt Concrete. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23475.
×
Page 73
Page 74
Suggested Citation:"References and Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Comparing the Volumetric and Mechanical Properties of Laboratory and Field Specimens of Asphalt Concrete. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23475.
×
Page 74
Page 75
Suggested Citation:"References and Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Comparing the Volumetric and Mechanical Properties of Laboratory and Field Specimens of Asphalt Concrete. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23475.
×
Page 75

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

73 AASHTO (2006) “AASHTO R 10–Standard Recommended Practice for Definition of Terms Related to Quality and Statistics As Used in Highway Construction.” AASHTO (1999) Standard Method of Test, “Sampling Bituminous Paving Mixtures.” AASHTO Designation: T168-82, Part II Tests, 16th Edition. AASHTO Materials Reference Library “Compilation of Statistics Hot Mix Asphalt.” Retrieved April 2010 from http://www.amrl.net/Portal /PublicDocs/PspStatistics/index.asp Afferton, K. C. (1967) “A Statistical Study of Asphaltic Concrete.” New Jersey State Department of Transportation, Highway Research Record 184, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 13–24. Aguirre Engineers and PCS/Law Engineering (1993) “An Investigative Study of the Colorado Department of Transportation Asphalt Mixture Design Procedure.” Executive Summary Report, CMS ID No. 023-91, Denver, CO, 64pp. Airey, G. D., A. C. Collop, and S. E. Zoorob (2006) “Comparison of Field and Laboratory-Compacted Asphalt Mixtures.” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Quebec, Canada, Vol. 1, pp. 35–46. Anderson, R. M., and H.U. Bahia (1997) “Evaluation and Selection of Aggregate Gradations for Asphalt Mixtures Using Superpave.” Transportation Research Record 1583, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 91–97. Aurilio, V., and C. Raymond (1995) “Development of End Result Speci- fication for Pavement Compaction.” Transportation Research Record 1491, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 11–17. Bazi, G. M., et al. (2006) “Laboratory Study of Construction Variabil- ity Impacts on Fatigue and Thermal Cracking Resistance of HMA Mixtures.” International Journal of Pavements, Vol. 5, Issue 1-2-3, pp. 37–49. Benson, P. E. (1995) “Comparison of End-Result and Method Specifica- tions for Managing Quality.” Transportation Research Record 1491, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 3–10. Bonaquist, R., and Christensen, D.W. (2005). “Practical Procedure for Developing Dynamic Modulus Master Curves for Pavement Struc- tural Design.” Transportation Research Record 1929, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 208–217. Brakey, B. A. (1994) “HPB QA/C Pilot Projects Constructed in 1993,” Second Interim Report, Materials Branch, Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, CO, May, 24 pp. Brown, E. R., et al. (2009) Hot Mix Asphalt, Materials, Mixture Design and Construction, 3rd Edition, Lanham: NAPA. Brown, E. R., et al. (1995) “Historical Development of Asphalt Content Determination by Ignition Method.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 64, pp. 241–277. Buchanan, M. S. (2000) “An Evaluation of Selected Methods of Mea- suring the Bulk Specific Gravity of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt Mixes.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 69, pp. 608–634. Buchanan, M. S., and E. R. Brown (2001) “Effect of Superpave Gyratory Compactor Type on Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Density.” Transportation Research Record 1761, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 50–60. Button, J. W., et al. (1994) “Correlation of Selected Laboratory Com- paction Methods with Field Compaction.” Transportation Research Record 1454, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 50–60. Butts, N., and K. Ksaibati (2003) “Asphalt Pavement Quality Control/ Quality Assurance Programs in the United States.” Paper No. 0123 presented at the 82nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meet- ing, Washington, DC. Cominsky, R. J., et al. (1998) NCHRP Report 409: Quality Control and Acceptance of Superpave-Designed Hot Mix Asphalt, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Cooley, L. A., et al. (2002) “Bulk Specific Gravity Round-Robin Using the Corelok Vacuum Sealing Device.” FHWA-IF-02-044, Nation- al Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, 123pp. D’Angelo, J. A., and T. Ferragut (1991) “Summary of Simulation Studies from Demonstration Project No. 74 Field Management of Asphalt Mixes.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 60, pp. 287–309. Elseifi, M. A. (2007) “Evaluation of Hot-Mix Asphalt Sampling Tech- niques.” FHWA-ICT-07-010, Illinois Center for Transportation, Urbana-Champaign, IL. Elseifi, M. A., et al. (2009) “Hot-Mix Asphalt Sampling Techniques and Methods of Acceptance–State DOT’s Practice.” Paper No. 09-1514 accepted for presentation at the 88th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. Epps, J. A., et al. (2002) NCHRP Report 455: Recommended Performance- Related Specification for Hot-Mix Asphalt Construction: Results of the Westrack Project, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 100pp. Fager, G. A. (1988) Variations of Asphalt Percentage in Bituminous Mixes from Drum Druey Mixes, Kansas Department of Transpor- tation, Topeka, KS, November, 22 pp. References and Bibliography

74 Farooq, I., and P. E. Sebaaly (1994) “Comparison of Laboratory Perfor- mance of AC-20P and AC-30 Mixtures.” Report No. 1085-3, Final Report to Nevada Department of Transportation, Carson City, NV, April. FHWA (1999) FHWA Multi-Regional Asphalt Training & Certification Group. Sampling Bituminous Paving Mixtures. Multi-Regional Training and Certification. FHWA (2004) FHWA Technical Advisory, “Use of Contractor Test Results in the Acceptance Decision, Recommended Quality Measures, and the Identification of Contractor/Department Risks.” T 6120.3. Freund, R. J., and W. J. Wilson (1997) Statistical Methods. San Diego: Academic Press. Guercio, M. C., et al. (2005) “Practical Procedure for Developing Dynamic Modulus Master Curves for Pavement Structural Design.” Transportation Research Record 1929, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, pp. 208–217. Hall, K. D., F. T. Griffith, and S. G. Williams (2001) “An Examination of Operator Variability for Selected Methods for Measuring Bulk Specific Gravity of Hot-Mix Asphalt Concrete.” Paper No. 01-2933 presented at the 80th Transportation Research Board Annual Meet- ing, Washington, DC. Hall, K. D., and S. G. Williams (2002) “Establishing Variability for Hot-Mix Asphalt Construction in Arkansas.” Transportation Research Record 1813, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Wash- ington, DC. pp. 151–156. Hancher, D. E., Y. Wang, and K. C. Mahboub (2002) “Contractor Per- formed Quality Control on KyTC Projects.” Report No. KTC-02-26/ SPR-01-222-1F, Kentucky Transportation Center, Lexington, KY, 131pp. Hand, A. J. and A. L. Epps (2000). “Effects of Test Variability on Mixture Volumetrics and Mix Design Verification.” Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc., Vol. 69, pp. 635–674. Harman, T., et al. (1995) “Evaluation of Superpave Gyratory Compac- tor in the Field Management of Asphalt Mixes.” Transportation Research Record 1513, Washington, DC, pp. 1–8. Hassan, M. A. (2002) “Sampling Location Impact on Measured Asphalt Content of Hot-Mix Asphalt.” Final Report No. CDOT-DTD-R- 2002-12, Denver, CO, pp. 40 Holsinger, R., A. Fisher, and P. Spellerberg (2005) NCHRP Web-Only Document 71: Precision Estimates for AASHTO Test Method T308 and the Test Methods for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder in AASHTO Specification M320 (Project 09-26). Transportation Research Board. Hong, M., and Y-R. Kim (2008) “Investigation of Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Testing Program in Nebraska.” Report No. NPM-16, Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln, NE. Hughes, C. S. (1988) “Field Management of Asphalt Concrete Mixes.” VTRC 89-R6, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottes- ville, VA, 17 pp. Hughes, C. S. (1984) “ Incentive and Disincentive Specification for Asphalt Concrete Density.” Transportation Research Record 986, Transporta- tion Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 38–42. Hughes, C. S. (1995) “Results from VDOT’s Pilot Project Using Volu- metric Properties and Asphalt Content for Acceptance of Asphalt Concrete.” VTRC95, Technical Assistance Report 9, Virginia Trans- portation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA, January, 7 pp. Hughes, C. S. (2005) NCHRP Synthesis 346: State Construction Quality Assurance Programs. TRB, Washington, DC, pp. 45. Ishak, S., H Shin, and B Sridhar (2009). “Characterization and Devel- opment of Truck Load Spectra and Growth Factors for Current and Future Pavement Design Practices in Louisiana.” LTRC Report 07-2P, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA. Kandhal, P. S., and L. A. Cooley (2003) NCHRP Report 508: Acceler- ated Laboratory Rutting Tests: Evaluation of the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Kandhal, P. S., et al. (1993) “Development and Implementation of Statistically Based End-Result Specifications for Hot-Mix Asphalt in Pennsylvania.” Transportation Research Record 1389, Washington, DC, pp. 9–16. Katicha, S. W., et al. (2011). “Effect of Compaction Method on the Resil- ient Modulus of Hot-Mix Asphalt.” Transportation Research Board Compendium of Papers, Paper 11-1939, 15 pp. Kim, M., et al. (2015) “A Simplified Performance-Based Specification for Asphalt Pavements.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 84, In press. Kim, Y. R., et al. (2004) “Dynamic Modulus Testing of Asphalt Concrete in Indirect Tension Mode.” Transportation Research Record 1891, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, pp. 163–173. Law, A. M. (2007) Simulation Modeling & Analysis, 4th Edition, McGraw Hill. Mahboub, K. C., D. E. Hancher, and Y. Wang (2004) “Contractor- Performed Quality Control: Is the Fox Guarding the Henhouse?” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 4, pp. 255–258. Markey, S. J., J. P. Mahoney, and R. M. Gietz (1993) “An Evaluation of the WSDOT Quality Assurance Specification for Asphalt Concrete.” Final Report, Research Project T9903, Task 3, Subtask 3, Special Programs, Washington State Transportation Center, Seattle, WA, October, 75 pp. Masad, E., E. Kassem, and A. Chowdhury (2009) “Application of Imaging Technology to Improve the Laboratory and Field Compaction of HMA.” Report No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5261-1, Austin, TX. Masad, E., et al. (2009) “A Method for Predicting Asphalt Mixture Compactability and Its Influence on Mechanical Properties.” Report No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5261-2, Austin, TX. McCarthy, L., et al. (2014) “Comparing Flexible Pavement Performance from Emerging Analysis Tools.” Journal of Transportation Engineer- ing, ASCE, Vol. 140 (5), May. McCarthy, L. M., and T. Bennert (2012) “Comparing HMA Dynamic Modulus Measured by Axial Compression and IDT Methods.” NCHRP Project 09-22b Final Report, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Mohammad, L. N., et al. (2012) “Evaluating Effects of Volumetric and Mechanistic Test Variability on Predicted Performance of Asphalt Pavement: Applying the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide.” Transportation Research Record 2268, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, pp. 44–49. Mohammad, L. N., et al. (2008) “Development of Models to Estimate the Subgrade and Subbase Layers’ Resilient Modulus from In Situ Devices Test Results for Construction Control.” LTRC Report 02-4B, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge. Mohammad, L. N., et al. (2004) “Variability of Air Voids and Mechanis- tic Properties of Plant Produced Asphalt Mixtures.” Transportation Research Record 1891. Journal of the Transportation Research Board TRB, Washington, DC, pp. 85–102. Mohammad, L., et al. (2007). “Comparative Study of the Mechanical Properties of HMA Mixture: Field Vs Laboratory.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 76, pp. 887–918. NCHRP Project 01-37A “Climatic Data.” http://www.trb.org/mepdg /climatic_state.htm, Accessed Jan. 2010. Nevitt, H. G. (1959) “Some Sources of Stability Measurement Variations.” Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 28, pp. 16–34.

75 Oglio, E. R., and J. A. Zenewitz. (1965) “A Study of Variability of Asphalt Concrete.” Bureau of Public Roads, Materials Division Office of Research and Development. Parker, F., and M. S. Hossain (2002) “Statistics for Superpave HMA Construction C/S Data.” Journal of Transportation Research Board: Transportation Research Record 1813, Washington, DC, pp. 172–80. Parker, F., and R. E. Turochy (2007) NCHRP Research Results Digest 323: Using the Results of Contractor-Performed Tests in Quality Assurance. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Patni, A. (2007) “Development of Performance Related Pay Factors for Asphalt Mixture Permanent Deformation Distress.” Ms. Thesis, Arizona State University. Peterson, R. L. (2003) “Superpave Laboratory Compaction versus Field Compaction.” Transportation Research Record 1832, Washington, DC, pp. 201–208. SAS Institute Inc. (2014) SAS Institute Inc (Version 9.2). Cary, NC. Schmitt, R. L., et al. (2001) “Analysis of Bias in HMA Field Split-Sample Testing.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 70, pp. 273–300. Sebaaly, P. E., and G. M. Bazi (2004). “Impact of Construction Variability on Pavement Performance.” University of Nevada, Reno; Nevada Department of Transportation, 95 pp. Sebaaly, P. E., et al. (2005) “Implementation of Superpave Mix Design and Analysis Procedures for the State of Nevada–Volume 5,” Final Report, Nevada DOT, Materials Division, Carson City, NV, February. Tran, N. H., and K. D. Hall (2004) “Development of Simplified Asphalt Concrete Stiffness/Fatigue Test Device.” Final Report, Grant Number MBTC 2014, Little Rock, AR. Turner, P., and R. C. West (2006) “Evaluation of the Effect of Sampling Location on Laboratory-Measured Quality Control Parameters.” Transportation Research Record 1946, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 163–170. Turochy, R. E., J. R. Willis, and F. Parker (2006) “Quality Assurance of Hot-Mix Asphalt: Comparison of Contractor Quality Control and Georgia Department of Transportation Data.” Transportation Research Record 1946, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 47–54. Underwood, S., M. Ahouri, and Y. R. Kim (2011). “Effect on Dynamic Modulus Measurement Protocol on Predicted Pavement Perfor- mance.” Journal of the Association of Paving Technologists, Vol. 80, pp. 65–100. Vallerga, B. (1951) “Recent Laboratory Compaction Studies of Bitu- minous Paving Mixtures.” Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 20, pp. 117–153. “Variations in Bituminous Construction in Nebraska,” (1968) Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln, NE. Weed, R. (1995) “Development of Air Voids Specifications for Bituminous Concrete.” Transportation Research Record 1491, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 33–39. Williams, T. A., and A. K. Williamson, (1989) “Estimating Water-Table Altitudes for Regional Ground-Water Flow Modeling.” U.S. Gulf Coast, Gulf Coast: Ground Water, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 333–340.

Next: Abbreviations and Acronyms »
Comparing the Volumetric and Mechanical Properties of Laboratory and Field Specimens of Asphalt Concrete Get This Book
×
 Comparing the Volumetric and Mechanical Properties of Laboratory and Field Specimens of Asphalt Concrete
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 818: Comparing the Volumetric and Mechanical Properties of Laboratory and Field Specimens of Asphalt Concrete provides proposed practices for evaluating the causes and magnitude of variability of specimen types tested in quality control and assurance programs for asphalt paving projects.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!