National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 4 Specific Changes in Criteria Wording or Emphasis
Suggested Citation:"Chapter 5 Next Steps." National Academy of Engineering. 2016. Forum on Proposed Revisions to ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission General Criteria on Student Outcomes and Curriculum (Criteria 3 and 5): A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23556.
×

Chapter 5
Next Steps

At the conclusion of the forum, Joe Sussman, ABET’s chief accreditation and information officer, reiterated that work on Criteria 3 and 5 is still in progress, recognized the importance of the forum for generating comments on the proposed changes, and encouraged interested stakeholders to continue to offer their opinions and suggestions about the proposed criteria to ABET. He strongly suspected that there would be further revisions and another cycle of feedback before the final approval of the revisions, but acknowledged that the Area Delegation might decide that enough work had been done, the changes to the criteria were acceptable, and approve them.

Patricia Daniels (University of Washington) offered her own take on the likely next steps. “I cannot tell you what the Criteria Committee will vote or what the Engineering Accreditation Commission will vote,” she said, “but I have seen some needs for some change, one of which is I am more than willing in Criterion 5(c) to remove the words ‘humanities and social sciences.’ I have learned now that was the wrong terminology.” She said she would recommend to the members of the Criteria Committee that they revise the criteria and send them back out for more comments but, again, could not guarantee how the EAC or Area Delegation would proceed.

If the Criteria Committee approved the criteria as written, Sussman said, the ABET board would vote on the proposed changes in October 2016, at which point they would be either approved or sent out for another round of review and comment. If the revised criteria were approved in October, they would not be effective until the 2017–2018 accreditation cycle at the earliest. But because of the breadth and complexity of the proposed changes, the Engineering Area Delegation might recommend to the EAC that there be a phase‐in period for the changes.

Finally, Atsushi Akera (Rensselaer Polytechnic) described other opportunities for providing feedback on the proposed criteria. The American Society for Engineering Education was planning to hold a virtual conference in late February or early March of 2016 to provide feedback on the proposed changes. And in late June 2016, a Town Hall session at the ASEE annual meeting in New Orleans will be dedicated to the proposed changes in the ABET criteria.

Suggested Citation:"Chapter 5 Next Steps." National Academy of Engineering. 2016. Forum on Proposed Revisions to ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission General Criteria on Student Outcomes and Curriculum (Criteria 3 and 5): A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23556.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Chapter 5 Next Steps." National Academy of Engineering. 2016. Forum on Proposed Revisions to ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission General Criteria on Student Outcomes and Curriculum (Criteria 3 and 5): A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23556.
×
Page 19
Suggested Citation:"Chapter 5 Next Steps." National Academy of Engineering. 2016. Forum on Proposed Revisions to ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission General Criteria on Student Outcomes and Curriculum (Criteria 3 and 5): A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23556.
×
Page 20
Next: Appendix A Forum Agenda »
Forum on Proposed Revisions to ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission General Criteria on Student Outcomes and Curriculum (Criteria 3 and 5): A Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Ebook | $9.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

On February 16, 2016, the National Academy of Engineering held a forum to discuss proposed changes to criteria used by ABET (formerly the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) to accredit engineering programs in colleges and universities around the world. The Forum on Proposed Revisions to ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission General Criteria on Student Outcomes and Curriculum (Criteria 3 and 5) convened a variety of stakeholders in the education of engineers, including representatives of universities, industry, and professional organizations. The presenters and attendees discussed the proposed changes and related issues such as a perceived lack of communication surrounding the development of the proposed changes and the degree to which the criteria prepare engineering students for jobs after graduation. This report summarizes the presentations and discussions from this forum.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!