National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Front Matter
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"Summary." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Spot Painting to Extend Highway Bridge Coating Life: Volume 2: Research Overview. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25090.
×
Page 1
Page 2
Suggested Citation:"Summary." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Spot Painting to Extend Highway Bridge Coating Life: Volume 2: Research Overview. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25090.
×
Page 2

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

NCHRP Project 14-30 1 SUMMARY Spot Painting to Extend Highway Bridge Coating Life Bridge coatings are the primary means of corrosion protection for steel bridges in the United States. Maintaining those coatings is a major challenge for State highway agencies that are faced with many bridges requiring repainting and constrained budgets that limit the amount of painting work they can perform. If the coatings are not preserved in a timely manner, they can fail and expose the steel bridge members to corrosion damage. That can lead to repairs or risks posed by corrosion losses to key structural members. Most bridge coatings tend to fail prematurely in localized areas and spot painting can be used to repair those. That will restore the lost corrosion protection and extend the service lives of existing bridge coatings, often at a fraction of the cost of a complete bridge repainting. However, many state highway agencies do not perform spot painting primarily due to performance concerns and lack of familiarity with its proper utilization and execution. This research was initiated to provide guidance to state highway agencies on “best practices” for employing spot painting in a cost-effective, safe, and environmentally compliant manner. That guidance, less the evaluation method employed in this report, is incorporated in a companion document (Hopwood et al. 2018). One component of this project was to develop laboratory procedures for accelerated testing of coatings to qualify them for use as spot repairs to specific existing coatings on bridges and assess their potential service lives. A key facet was the focus on the SSPC-SP 3, “Power Tool Cleaning” method for preparing damaged steel surfaces/existing coatings to receive applications of spot coatings. That method provides an acceptable level of surface cleanliness to promote reasonable spot coating performance under atmospheric exposure in mild or moderate climates. It can be utilized by a range of workers from in-house bridge maintenance crews to experienced painting contractor personnel. The KTC at the University of Kentucky developed a testing protocol that replicated typical spot failures on steel test panels using three types of coatings to duplicate existing bridge coatings. Corroded areas on the panels received surface preparation using the SSPC-SP 3 standard. The test panels were subsequently coated with six conventional 2-coat liquid-applied coating systems amenable to the SSPC-SP 3 standard and several non-traditional coatings -- a grease and a tape. Those were intended to assess both the test procedures employed and the performance of the coatings over typical substrates receiving spot coatings in the field. The coated test panels were subjected to conventional accelerated weathering and corrosion laboratory tests to stress the coatings and determine their performance under conditions that simulated several common types of coating exposure on bridges. The test panels were periodically evaluated for damage by rusting and blistering. At the end of the testing program, the coated flat panels had been exposed to 5,000 hours of testing which proved sufficient to fail lower-performing coatings and validate the test protocols as being suitable for screening coatings for use on bridge spot painting projects using SP 3 surface preparation and common (existing) bridge coatings or, at least, provide comparative performance data. A field test protocol was developed during preparation of the guidance document that enabled field researchers to conduct experimental spot painting tests on several bridges using those procedures in conjunction with the use of surface preparation employing the SSPC-SP 3 standard and coatings evaluated in the laboratory tests. Three Kentucky Transportation Cabinet

NCHRP Project 14-30 2 (KYTC) bridges were selected for testing which had coatings containing lead, requiring KTC to address the appropriate worker safety and environmental protection actions to achieve regulatory compliance. Prior to performing the field tests, coatings assessments were conducted to measure key parameters on the bridges that impacted the performance of maintenance painting work and the selection of spot painting as a viable option using the field test protocol. Based on those assessments, field researchers mobilized and applied spot coating repairs to the three bridges. The work encompassed two areas on one bridge with different problems — disbonding of the existing coatings (alkyds) and corrosion under a leaking deck joint. The spot coating work in the first area was intended to repair the failed existing coating and halt further disbonding. Spot work in the second area was intended to repair the failed existing coating and stop further corrosion. Work on the other two (twin) bridges was also intended to repair failed existing coatings and stop further corrosion. Work on those bridges addressed corrosion issues occurring with a different type of existing coating system than on the first bridge — an inorganic zinc/vinyl. The field spot painting work was performed in accordance with the KTC spot painting protocol and was successfully completed without incident. The field spot coating tests were evaluated 14 months after application and most were performing satisfactorily. The coatings had halted progressive failures of existing coatings in the disbonding problem areas. In the other areas with corrosion, there was evidence of rust-back to varying degrees with the conventional coatings, but in most cases, it was limited and the coatings were effective in halting widespread corrosion damage. More time would be required to determine the long-term performance of the field spot coatings and better correlate their performance with the laboratory test results. The research performed provides guidance for state highway agencies to address the use of spot painting as a viable maintenance painting option for bridge coatings. It further provides a laboratory protocol for assessing candidate spot coating systems. It also demonstrates a spot painting method that could be applied by relatively inexperienced state highway agency bridge crews to affect spot repairs of damaged coatings on steel bridges using minimal procedures such as SSPC-SP 3, “Power Tool Cleaning” and brush application of liquid-applied coatings. Troweling and wall paper hanging procedures were used by KTC researchers to apply the grease and tape respectively. Those methods are also amenable for adoption by state highway bridge crews.

Next: Chapter 1. Background, Project Objectives, and Research Approach »
Spot Painting to Extend Highway Bridge Coating Life: Volume 2: Research Overview Get This Book
×
 Spot Painting to Extend Highway Bridge Coating Life: Volume 2: Research Overview
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 251: Spot Painting to Extend Highway Bridge Coating Life: Volume 2: Research Overview documents the evaluation method for a guidance document that provides approaches for employing spot painting in a cost-effective, safe, and environmentally compliant manner. Bridge coatings are the primary means of corrosion protection for steel bridges in the United States. Most bridge coatings tend to fail prematurely in localized areas and spot painting can be used restore the lost corrosion protection and extend the service lives of existing bridge coatings, often at a fraction of the cost of a complete bridge repainting. However, many state highway agencies do not perform spot painting primarily due to performance concerns and lack of familiarity with its proper utilization and execution.

The research overview is accompanied by NCHRP Web-Only Document 251: Volume 1: Guidance.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!