National Academies Press: OpenBook

Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys (2018)

Chapter: Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys

« Previous: 8 Toward an Integrated Annual Business Survey System
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×

Appendix A

Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys

As described in Chapter 2, the Panel on Reengineering the Census Bureau’s Annual Economic Surveys requested input from users and potential users of data from these surveys. The panel received input from 11 users: some spoke at an open meeting of the panel on June 2, 2016; others spoke with individual panel members. The panel is very appreciative of their input.

The panel asked users to address the following questions:

  • What is the mission of your organization/department? Who are your clients?
  • What economic data do you use, most specifically from the Census Bureau, but also from other federal agencies? What annual Census Bureau economic surveys do you use, if any? Approximately, what share of your work involves economic census data? How do you use them? How important is it for your mission?
  • How do you access the Census Bureau data? Is there a change(s) that would significantly reduce your burden in accessing their data?
  • In which of your publications/products are census economic data used?
  • What other economic data do you use, and what is the source? If you purchase data from a private vendor, who is the vendor? What data do you purchase from them, and why? What are the benefits and downsides of using privately sourced data?
  • What limitations or gaps do you see in the data? How do you deal with them?
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
  • What are the trends in data use in your industry or organization, such as in data availability, data analytics, technology changes, big data/open data, staffing pressures, changing expectations from clients/supporters, etc.?
  • What are three suggestions or actions you would recommend for the Census Bureau to improve the usability of their economic data products?

The following users provided input to the panel:

Kim Bayard, principal economist, Division of Research and Statistics, Federal Reserve Board

Aaron Catlin, deputy director, National Health Statistics Group, Office of the Actuary, Centers & Medicare and Medicaid Services

Jim Diffley, senior director, Industry Services and Consulting Group, IHS Economics

Dennis Fixler, chief economist, Bureau of Economic Analysis

Vanessa Goeschl, senior vice president, Economic Development, Charlotte (NC) Regional Partnership

Maurine Haver, president, Haver Analytics, Inc.

Eric Long, research economist, Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce

Nancy McCrea, director, Maryland Department of Commerce, Policy Planning, and Research

Jose Plehn, chairman, chief research officer, and cofounder, Powerlytics

Chris Sparks, division chief, Industry and Productivity Studies, Bureau of Labor Statistics

Neal Young, director, Economic Analysis, Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×

Table A-1 lists specific user observations and suggestions, which the U.S. Census Bureau may wish to consider in reengineering the surveys. The table entries are arranged by dimension (relevance, accuracy, timeliness, consistency, and accessibility) and user organization.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×

TABLE A-1 User Suggestions for the Census Bureau’s Annual Economic Surveys

Organization or Sector of User Dimension
Relevance Accuracy
Bureau of Economic Analysis
  • Continue to improve and expand data products in response to changes in the economy including greater industry detail
  • Provide improved coverage of expense data, e.g., for energy purchases
  • Expand enterprise survey collection
  • Consider integrating enterprise and establishment collections
  • Provide more information about data quality, reliability, coefficients of variation, response rates, respondent burden, and other quality assessments
Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • Provide more compensation data
  • For specific surveys:
    Capital Expenditures: provide annual detailed industry and asset investment data
    Retail Trade: provide more revenue detail
    Manufactures: provide data for more service categories (such as communications services); provide annual data on primary and secondary shipments
    Wholesale Trade: provide annual resales data
    Services: provide more detail, such as revenue by product line; provide greater product detail using the new NAPCS; provide made-in industry and wherever-made product revenue by broad NAPCS codes (which requires similar annual revenue data for construction, agriculture, and utilities)
  • Continue to provide high-quality data, which is the most important dimension of all
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
 
Timeliness Consistency Accessibility
  • Continue to make efforts to improve the timeliness and accuracy of the estimates
  • Update data based on revised international standards and guidelines
  • Maintain revision histories for monthly indicators
  • Continue to investigate revisions in monthly, quarterly, and annual data series
  • Improve the AFF dissemination interface to reduce data user burden
  • Present data in machine-readable format, such as the FTP site and APIs, to allow data to be accessed much more efficiently
  • Continue to expand API tools along with training on how best to use and leverage them
  • Make information on the magnitude and sources of revision, reliability, and response rates public and easy to find
  • Provide additional detail on a timelier basis
  • Retail Trade: provide more timely data
  • Provide direct comparability between the economic censuses and the annual surveys to facilitate benchmarking the surveys to the censuses
  • Provide data from all surveys in a common format over time, from a common site
  • Improve communications about changes in products and programs
  • Identify all data that have been superseded by more current data
  • Improve communications for data revision and data updates, including email/RSS type notifications, including the timing of data releases and the timing and reasons for data revisions
  • Make it easier to manipulate the data, e.g., allow users to change geography and industry information within a table and provide option to sort results by publication date
  • Provide access to the full dataset on each survey’s home page
  • Provide machine-readable formats, APIs, and other ways to get data fast;
  • Provide SAS/Stata code with record locator details for FTP files
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Organization or Sector of User Dimension
Relevance Accuracy
Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Division of Research and Statistics
  • Restore the data collection for the Current Industrial Reports (discontinued after mid-2011, which was great loss)
  • Reinstate the ICTS, which is now on hold
  • Improve coverage of all services spending categories in the QSS; distinguish between domestic and international sources of revenue in the QSS and international trade data
  • Provide as much detail as is provided to BEA for construction of NIPAs
  • Improve industry aggregates; consolidation of categories provides less detail
  • Speed up the evolution of NAICS, and provide a more relevant classification system; eliminate the “Miscellaneous” category as it is not helpful
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, National Health Statistics Group, Office of the Actuary
  • Provide data on the government sector across industries: for example, ambulance private payments to a public provider; hospital data are used but double counting is a risk
  • Expand the Service Annual Survey with key analytical data, such as utilization measures across health sectors, such as physician utilization and more detail on product lines; examples include optometrists’ fees and sales of glasses, and revenue physicians receive from hospitals (without double counting)
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
 
Timeliness Consistency Accessibility
  • Improve timeliness
  • Accelerate the release of QSS, by even a week
  • Compress the data release schedule for the economic censuses, which stretches out for years
  • Improve the speed of publishing annual data on industry capital expenditures and any bridge tables (e.g., NAICS 2007–2012)
  • Improve the process for gaining access to data through the FSRDCs to be less cumbersome and more timely
  • Improve the Census Bureau website by (1) making it easier to download larger datasets with AFF and (2) making it easier to consult with subject-matter experts
  • Provide data that reflect consistent time periods; currently they reflect a mix of fiscal and calendar year reporting
  • Integrate similar information from various surveys to make it easier to compare trends across data products
  • Present data as a continuous time series in all products
  • Provide a release schedule for the annual surveys at the beginning of the calendar year so users can plan accordingly
  • Provide an interactive tool for building tables by NAICS category and survey items for selected time periods with an option to chart results similar to BEA’s interactive tool
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Organization or Sector of User Dimension
Relevance Accuracy
Business and Industry; Consulting Firms
  • Release data by NAPCS (product) codes in addition to NAICS (industry) codes as is planned for the 2017 Economic Censuses
  • Provide localized housing sector data (standard errors are too large)
  • Provide regional and local retail data (reviving an historic Census Bureau program)
  • Create more useful Internet retail data; ascertain whether data users need data by place of production vs. place of delivery, and how businesses keep their books
  • Use administrative data to generate local statistics (such as retail scanner data, building permit data, property tax data)
  • Create annual construction data (currently there is only monthly data and economic census coverage of construction)
  • Create better monthly manufacturing data
  • Create a monthly services survey
  • Provide both establishment and company data
  • Provide better, more user-friendly data and estimates in chronological order
  • Use spatial technology to improve the creation of local area estimates
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
 
Timeliness Consistency Accessibility
  • Release preliminary estimates followed by the final data
  • Integrate administrative data to increase timeliness and reduce respondent burden
  • Establish common data definitions across sectors, where possible
  • Create a comprehensive calendar of economic data releases
  • Significantly improve web navigation and access to Census Bureau economic data
  • Provide training programs for business and industry on how to use the data
  • Make Census Bureau analysts available to data users to demystify the data
  • Make Census Bureau websites easier to navigate and to find important information about the data/metadata
  • Make the data easier to access and download into a useful time-series format
  • Create a single FTP server for all Census Bureau datasets to facilitate access by data users, with a well-designed folder structure and sensible file structure
  • Provide training programs
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Organization or Sector of User Dimension
Relevance Accuracy
State and Local Government Data Users
  • Provide better options for generating data for customized small-area geography (private data vendors provide easy data aggregation at the ZIP code level and industry level for a wide variety of data)
  • Consider aggregating data not only for political geographies, but also in terms of economic patterns, such as “drive time” or radius geography, similar to spatial data aggregations of demographic data
  • Work with businesses and trade organizations to understand industry trends and how data are measured and recorded
  • Census Bureau economic data are the “gold standard” but are not often available for local geographies

NOTES: AFF, American FactFinder; API, application programming interface; ASM, Annual Survey of Manufactures; BEA, Bureau of Economic Analysis; FSRDC, Federal Statistical System Research Data Center; FTP, file transfer protocol; ICTS, Information and Communication Survey; NAICS, North American Industry Classification System; NAPCS, North American Product Classification System; NIPA, National Income and Product Accounts; QSS, Quarterly Services Survey; RSS, rich site summary or really simple syndication; SAS, service annual survey.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
 
Timeliness Consistency Accessibility
  • Provide more timely data by the first or second quarter of the following year for annual surveys and more frequent data
  • Provide early release of key indicators; an example for the ASM is value added first and production workers second
  • Avoid sequestration-related data release delays
  • Create consistent definitions across agencies (e.g., NAICS codes)
  • Provide data visualization and dashboard tools
  • Provide YouTube style tutorials for select datasets
  • Offer webinars when new or improved data sources are offered to the public
  • Provide easier access to historical data series
  • Provide links to the program’s home page in AFF (e.g., to County Business Patterns)
  • Create a more user-friendly AFF with direct access to files, better navigation and meta data, in a user-friendly structure with real-time chat
  • Be responsive to all types of users from simple to sophisticated
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 179
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 180
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 181
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 182
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 183
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 184
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 185
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 186
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 187
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 188
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 189
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Observations from Users of the Annual Economic Surveys." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25098.
×
Page 190
Next: Appendix B: Surveys Covered in this Report »
Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys Get This Book
×
 Reengineering the Census Bureau's Annual Economic Surveys
Buy Paperback | $60.00 Buy Ebook | $48.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The U.S. Census Bureau maintains an important portfolio of economic statistics programs, including quinquennial economic censuses, annual economic surveys, and quarterly and monthly indicator surveys. Government, corporate, and academic users rely on the data to understand the complexity and dynamism of the U.S. economy. Historically, the Bureau's economic statistics programs developed sector by sector (e.g., separate surveys of manufacturing, retail trade, and wholesale trade), and they continue to operate largely independently. Consequently, inconsistencies in questionnaire content, sample and survey design, and survey operations make the data not only more difficult to use, but also more costly to collect and process and more burdensome to the business community than they could be.

This report reviews the Census Bureau's annual economic surveys. Specifically, it examines the design, operations, and products of 11 surveys and makes recommendations to enable them to better answer questions about the evolving economy.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!