National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Part C - Understanding the GAM Process
Page 136
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Geotechnical Asset Management for Transportation Agencies, Volume 2: Implementation Manual. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25364.
×
Page 136
Page 137
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Geotechnical Asset Management for Transportation Agencies, Volume 2: Implementation Manual. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25364.
×
Page 137
Page 138
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Geotechnical Asset Management for Transportation Agencies, Volume 2: Implementation Manual. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25364.
×
Page 138

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

136 AASHTO. 2010. User and Non-User Benefit Analysis for Highways. American Association of Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO. 2011. AASHTO Transportation Asset Management Guide: A Focus on Implementation. American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. Adams, T. M., A. N. Koncz, and A. P. Vonderohe. 2001. NCHRP Report 460: Guidelines for the Implemen- tation of Multimodal Transportation Location Referencing Systems. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Akofio-Sowah, M. A, R. Boadi, A. Amekudzi, and M. Meyer. 2014. “Managing Ancillary Transportation Assets: The State of the Practice.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1. Paper No. 04013010. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. Anderson, S. A., D. A. Stanley, and J. E. Loehr. 2014. “Managing Geotechnical Assets to Improve Highway System Performance.” Geo-Strata, Vol. 15, No. 2. The Geo-Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp. 20–24. Anderson, S. A., V. R. Schaefer, and S. C. Nichols. 2016. “Taxonomy for Geotechnical Assets, Elements, and Features.” In: Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting: Compendium of Papers. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Anderson, S. A. 2016. “Communicating Multiobjective Risk: A New Geotechnical Need for Transporta- tion.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2580, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 80–88. DOI: 10.3141/2580-10 Asset Institute. 2015. Asset Management Capability Maturity Model (AMCaMM). The Asset Institute at Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, Australia. Austroads. (2016). Data Standard for Road Management and Investment in Australia and New Zealand: Draft 1 Version 2. Austroads, Sydney, Australia. British Standards Institution (BSI). (2008). PAS 55-1:2008: Asset Management, Part 1: Specification for the Optimized Management of Physical Assets. BSI: London, England. Bründl, M., H. E. Romang, N. Bischof, and C. M. Rheinberger, 2009. “The Risk Concept and its Application in Natural Hazard Risk Management in Switzerland.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 801. European Geosciences Union: Copernicus Publications, Göttingen, Germany, pp. 801–13. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Applied Research Associates, Inc., Arora and Associates, KLS Engineering, PB Consult, and L. Lambert. 2009. NCHRP Report 632: An Asset Management Framework for the Interstate Highway System. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Choate, A., B. Dix, B. Rodehorst, A. Wong, W. Jaglom, J. Keller, J. Lennon, C. Dorney, R. Kuchibhotla, J. Mallela, S. Sadasivam, and S. Douglass. 2017. Synthesis of Approaches for Addressing Resilience in Project Develop- ment. FHWA-HEP-17-082. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Wash- ington, D.C. Collin, J., J. E. Loehr, and C. J. Hung. 2008. Slope Maintenance and Slide Restoration Reference Manual for NHI Course 132081. FHWA NHI-08-098. National Highway Institute, Arlington, VA. Connelly, E. B., H. Thorisson, L. J. Valverde, Jr., and J. H. Lambert. 2016. “Asset Risk Management and Resilience for Flood Control, Hydropower, and Waterways.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering. Committee on Technical Advancement, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. Crossett, J. and K. Schneweis. 2012. NCHRP Report 742: Communicating the Value of Preservation: A Playbook. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2012a. Risk-Based Transportation Asset Management: Achieving Policy Objectives by Managing Risks: Report 3: Risks to Asset Management Policies. FHWA-HIF-12-054. References

References 137 U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Available at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/pubs. cfm?thisarea=risk. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2012b. Risk-Based Transportation Asset Management: Evaluat- ing Threats, Capitalizing on Opportunities: Report 1: Overview of Risk Management. FHWA-HIF-23-035. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Available at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/pubs. cfm?thisarea=risk. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2012c. Risk-Based Transportation Asset Management: Examining Risk- Based Approaches to Transportation Asset Management: Report 2: Managing Asset Risks at Multiple Levels in a Transportation Agency. FHWA-HIF-12-050. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Available at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/pubs.cfm?thisarea=risk. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2013a. FHWA Performance Reporting, Part Two of Two, Final Report. Report No. FHWA-HIF-13-044. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2013b. Risk-Based Transportation Asset Management, Report 5: Building Resilience into Transportation Assets FHWA-HIF-13-013. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Available at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/pubs.cfm?thisarea=risk. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2013c. Risk-Based Transportation Asset Management: Managing Risks to Networks, Corridors, and Critical Structures: Report 4: Managing Risks to Critical Assets. FHWA- HIF-13-017. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Available at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ asset/pubs.cfm?thisarea=risk. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2014a. All Public Road Geospatial Representation Study All Road Network of Linear Referenced Data (ARNOLD) Reference Manual. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/hpms/documents/arnold_ reference_manual_2014.pdf (accessed April 26, 2018). Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2014b. Focus. (April 2014). FHWA-HRT-14-012. Federal High- way Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Available online: https:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2014c. Specification for the National Bridge Inventory: Bridge Elements. FHWA website: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/131216_a1.pdf. Federal Highway Administration. (FHWA) 2016. TPM Toolbox. FHWA website: https://www.tpmtools.org/ (accessed April 26, 2018). Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2018. Transportation Asset Management Plans. FHWA website: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/plans.cfm (accessed January 15, 2018). Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2019. Transportation Performance Management (TPM) Guide- book. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Available online: https://www.tpmtools.org/ guidebook/. HDR and Decision Economics, Inc. 2010. Economic Impact of Rockslides in Tennessee and North Carolina. Report to the Appalachian Regional Commission, Washington, D.C. Herrera, E. K., A. Flannery, and M. Krimmer. 2017. “Risk and Resilience Analysis for Highway Assets.” Trans- portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2604. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 1–88. DOI: 10.3141/2604-01. Hurst, K. S. 1999. Engineering Design Principles, 1st ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier, New York, NY. Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia (IPWEA). 2015. International Infrastructure Management Manual, 5th ed. National Asset Management Steering (NAMS) Group, Wellington, NZ. International Standards Organization (ISO). 2018. ISO 55000:2014(en). Asset Management—Overview, Prin- ciples, and Terminology. ISO website https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:55000:ed-1:v2:en:term:3.2.1 (accessed January 15, 2018). Lacasse S. 2016. “Hazard, Reliability and Risk Assessment: Research and Practice for Increased Safety.” Proceed- ings of the 17th Nordic Geotechnical Meeting (May 25-28, 2016, Reykjavik, Iceland). Icelandic Geotechnical Society. Available online from the library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: https://www.issmge.org/publications/online-library. Maggiore, M., K. M. Ford, High Street Consulting Group, and Burns & McDonnell. 2015. NCHRP Report 806: Guide to Cross-Asset Resource Allocation and the Impact on Transportation System Performance. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. National Highway Institute (NHI). 2017. “Developing a Transportation Asset Management Plan.” FHWA-NHI- 136106B National Highway Institute, Arlington, VA. Information available online: https://www.nhi.fhwa. dot.gov/course-search?tab=0&cat=137000&course_no=136106B&sf=1. Network Rail, 2017. Earthworks Asset Policy (March 2017). Network Rail Infrastructure Limited. Oxford University Press. 2014. “Taxonomy,” defined in Oxford Living Dictionaries: English (US). Online: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/taxonomy?q=taxonomy (accessed February 18, 2014).

138 Geotechnical Asset Management for Transportation Agencies, Volume 2: Implementation Manual Perry, J. G., M. Pedley, and K. Brady. 2003. Infrastructure Cuttings: Condition Appraisal and Remedial Treatment. Publication C591. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London, United Kingdom. Perry, J. G., M. Pedley, and M. Reid. 2003. Infrastructure Embankments—Condition Appraisal and Remedial Treat- ment, 2d ed. Publication C592. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London, United Kingdom. Pierson, L. A. 1991. The Rockfall Hazard Rating System. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, OR. Power, C., D. Patterson, D. Rudrum, D. Wright. 2012. “Geotechnical Asset Management for the UK Highways Agency.” In: Radford, T. A. (ed.). Earthworks in Europe. Geological Society, Engineering Geology Special Publication 26, London, United Kingdom. DOI: 10.1002/gj.2667. Power, C. 2015. “Earthwork Examinations: Improved Understanding of Likelihood of Failure.” Presented at the Geotechnics in the Rail Industry Conference (May 2015). York, England. Power, C., J. Mian, T. Spink, S. Abbott, and M. Edwards. 2016. “Development of an Evidence-Based Geo technical Asset Management Policy for Network Rail, Great Britain.” Presented at Advances in Transportation Geo- technics 3: The 3rd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics (ICTG 2016), Portugal. In: Procedia Engineering, Vol. 143, pp. 726–733. Proctor, G., S. Varma, and J. Roorda. 2016. Managing Risk Across the Enterprise: A Guide for State Departments of Transportation. Contractor’s Final Report, NCHRP Project 08-93. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Russell, P. R. 2017. “Dam Worries Resurface after Oroville Scare.” Engineering News-Record (May 17, 2017), Troy, MI. Online: https://www.enr.com/articles/42072-dam-worries-resurface-after-oroville-scare?v= preview#comments. Sanford Bernhardt, K. L., J. E. Loehr, and D. Huaco. 2003. “Asset Management Framework for Geotechnical Infrastructure.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 9, No. 3, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp. 107116. Spy Pond Partners, LLC, and Iteris, Inc. 2015. NCHRP Report 814: Data to Support Transportation Agency Business Needs: A Self-Assessment Guide. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Spy Pond Partners, LLC, HDR, Inc., and H. Cohen. 2018. NCHRP Research Report 866: Return on Investment in Transportation Asset Management Systems and Practices. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Spy Pond Partners, LLC, KPMG, and University of Texas at Austin Center for Transportation Research. 2019. NCHRP Research Report 898: A Guide to Developing Financial Plans and Performance Measures for Transpor- tation Asset Management. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Taggart, A., L. Tachtsi, H. Davies, and M. Lugg. 2014. UKRLG Framework for Highway Infrastructure Asset Management. Infrastructure Asset Management. Joint Transportation Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University. 1. 10-19. 10.1680/iasma.13.00012. Thompson, P. D. 2017. Geotechnical Asset Management Plan, Technical Report. Report STP000S(802)(B). Prepared for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Juneu, Alaska. UK Department for Transport. 2003. “Maintenance of Highway Geotechnical Assets.” In Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Vol. 4, Sec. 1, Pt. 3. UK Department for Transport, London, England. UK Roads Liaison Group. 2013. Highway Infrastructure Asset Management Guidance Document. London, U.K. Department for Transport. Online: http://www.ukroadsliaisongroup.org/download.cfm/docid/ 5C49F48E-1CE0-477F-933ACBFA169AF8CB (accessed April 27, 2018). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2013. Best Practices in Asset Management. Report 2013-R-08. Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, VA. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2014. Safety of Dams – Policies and Procedures. Regulation No. 1110- 2-1156. Online: http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerRegulations/ ER_1110-2-1156.pdf. Vessely, M., S. Richrath, and E. Weldemicael. 2017. “Economic Impacts from Geologic Hazard Events on Colorado Department of Transportation Right-of-Way.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2646. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC, pp. 8–16. Walters, B. X., M. P. Collins, N. E. Funk, M. J. Vessely, B. L. Widman, J. W. Koonce, M. J. Garlich, and P. D. Thompson. 2016. Colorado Retaining and Noise Walls Inspection and Asset Management Manual, Version 1.0 (April 2016). Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, CO. Washington State Department of Transportation (Washington State DOT). 2017. “Grey Notebook.” Wash- ington State DOT webpage: https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Accountability/GrayNotebook/ (updated annually; accessed 2018). Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF). 2018. Life-Cycle Costing Tool. Online: http://simple.werf.org/ simple/media/LCCT/index.html (accessed April 27, 2018). Zimmerman, K. A., T. E. Hoerner, and P. Ram. 2015. Transportation Asset Management Gap Analysis Tool User’s Guide. NCHRP Project 08-93, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Available online: http:// www.tam-portal.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/GapAnalysisTool_Users-Guide_v1.00.pdf (accessed April 27, 2018).

Next: Glossary and Abbreviations »
Geotechnical Asset Management for Transportation Agencies, Volume 2: Implementation Manual Get This Book
×
 Geotechnical Asset Management for Transportation Agencies, Volume 2: Implementation Manual
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Research Report 903: Geotechnical Asset Management for Transportation Agencies, Volume 2: Implementation Manual presents a manual that can be used to implement Geotechnical Asset Management (GAM) planning.

Volume 1, Research Overview, details the scope, process, and findings of the study.

The management of bridge and pavement assets has for many years garnered significant attention by state transportation agencies while the management of geotechnical assets—such as walls, slopes, embankments, and subgrades—has been elusive. Traditionally, geotechnical assets have been treated as unpredictable hazard sites with significant potential liability because failure of any geotechnical asset may lead to traveler delay, damage to other assets, or impact safety. Geotechnical assets are, however, vital to the successful operation of transportation systems and present an opportunity for system owners and operators to realize new economic benefits through risk-based asset management.

There are several downloadable files that accompany Volume 2. Links to those files and the information they contain include the following:

Appendices

Appendix A: Using the GAM Planner,

Appendix B: GAM Inventory Start Example,

Appendix C: GAM Model Formulation,

Appendix D: Geotechnical Asset Condition and Level-of-Risk Examples,

Appendix E: GAM Asset-Level Net Present Value Framework Worksheet,

Appendix F: GAM Plan Outline, and

Appendix G: GAM Implementation Barrier Mitigation Strategy Matrix.

Planner

This file contains the spreadsheet-based (Microsoft Excel) tool. User information for the GAM Planner is provided in Volume 2, Appendix A.

Template

This file contains a spreadsheet-based (Microsoft Excel) worksheet template for a life-cycle cost investment analysis tool. The template supports the process of selecting project-level treatment alternatives in GAM and can be used for investment-based treatment alternative analysis that considers asset or project life-cycle costs including design, O&M, and any potential rehabilitation or reconstruction treatments. User information for the NPV Template appears in Volume 2, Appendix E.

Training Slides

This file contains a slide-based presentation (created in Microsoft PowerPoint) that can be used during training for GAM.Downloadable files and the information contained in those

Note: To use the GAM Planner it is necessary to enable macros. Also, the “Excel Solver” must be installed. The Excel Solver is a plug-in provided with Microsoft Excel.

Software Disclaimer - This software is offered as is, without warranty or promise of support of any kind either expressed or implied. Under no circumstance will the National Academy of Sciences or the Transportation Research Board (collectively "TRB") be liable for any loss or damage caused by the installation or operation of this product. TRB makes no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, in fact or in law, including without limitation, the warranty of merchantability or the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not in any case be liable for any consequential or special damages. TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Research Report 903: Geotechnical Asset Management for Transportation Agencies provides an introduction and scalable guidance for state transportation agencies on how to implement risk-based geotechnical asset management into current asset management plans. Volume 1, Research Overview, details the scope, process, and findings of the study.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!