Prioritization Procedure for Proposed Road–Rail Grade Separation Projects Along Specific Rail Corridors (2019)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

44 References AARP. 2005. Beyond 50.05: A Report to the Nation on Livable Communi- ties: Creating Environments for Successful Aging. Washington, D.C. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2010a. Highway Safety Manual. Washington, D.C. AASHTO. 2010b. The Road to Livability: How State Departments of Transportation Are Using Road Investments to Improve Community Livability. http://www.infrastructureusa.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2010/04/aashto-road-to-livability.pdf. American Institute of Architects. 2005. Livability 101: What Makes a Community Livable? Washington, D.C. Aoun, R. Ben, E. El Koursi, and E. Lemaire. 2010. The Cost–Benefit Analysis of Level Crossing Safety Measures. 12th International Conference on Computer System Design and Operation in Rail- ways and Other Transit Systems. doi: 10.2495/CR100. Chadwick, S. G., M. R. Saat, C. T. Dick, and C. P. L. Barkan. 2013. Decreasing Derailment Occurrence and Severity at Highway–Rail Grade Crossings. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. http://railtec.illinois.edu/articles/Files/Conference%20Proceedings/ 2013/Chadwick-et-al-2013-AREMA-final.pdf. Cronin, B., Mortensen, S., and Thompson, D. 2018. Integrated Corridor Management. U.S. Department of Transportation. Dodgson, J. S. 1984. Benefit–Cost Analysis and the Construction and Financing of Rail/Highway Grade Separations. Transpor- tation Research Part A: General 18 (5–6): 367–77. doi: 10.1016/ 0191-2607(84)90012-8. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of Trans- portation (USDOT). 2018. Safety web page. https://safety.fhwa.dot. gov/hsip/xings/. Accessed 2/22/2018. FHWA, USDOT. 2013. Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit: 2013 Conditions and Performance. FHWA, USDOT. 2011a. The Role of FHWA Programs in Livability: State of the Practice Summary. March 21. FHWA, USDOT. 2011b. Highway Finance Data Collection: Our Nation’s Highways: 2011. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/ pubs/hf/pl11028/chapter1.cfm#fig15 . Accessed October 7, 2016. FHWA, USDOT. 2007. Railroad–Highway Grade Crossing Handbook. 2007. FHWA, USDOT. 2004. Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit: 2004 Conditions and Performance. https://www.fhwa.dot. gov/policy/2004cpr/chap19.cfm. Accessed April 4, 2017. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). 2018. Highway–Rail Grade Crossings Overview. https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0156. Accessed February 23, 2018. FRA. 2016. Office of Safety Analysis. http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/ OfficeofSafety/Default.aspx. June 16, 2016. Updated January 11, 2019. FRA. 2009. Research Results. RR 09-12. July. FRA. 2006. Impact of Blocked Highway/Rail Grade Crossings on Emer- gency Response Services. August. p. 15. Hakkert, A. S., and V. Gitelman. Development of Evaluation Tools for Road-Rail Crossing Consideration for Grade Separation. Transpor- tation Research Record, No. 1605, 1998, pp. 96–105. Harwood, D. W., E. R. Rabbani, K. R. Richard, H. McGee, and G. Gittings. 2003. NCHRP Report 486: Systemwide Impact of Safety and Traffic Operations Design Decisions for 3R Projects. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_486_full.pdf. Illinois Commerce Commission, Research and Analysis Section, Trans- portation Division. 2002. Motorist Delay at Public Highway–Rail Grade Crossings in Northeastern Illinois. Working Paper 2002-03. July. https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/documents/10180/29236/ 021114rrdelay1.pdf. InfraConsult. 2012. Grade Separation Priority Update Study for Alameda Corridor East (Riverside County). Riverside County Transportation Commission, March. Liu, X., M. Saat, and C. Barkan. 2017. Freight-Train Derailment Rates for Railroad Safety and Risk Analysis. Revised 11 October. Accident Analysis and Prevention 98:1–9, January. 2017. Pg. 2. McGurty, J. and L. Adler. Mathew, J., R. F. Benekohal, and J. C. Medina. 2017. Nested Sorting and Clustering for Visualization of Accidents in Highway–Rail Grade Crossings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transpor- tation Research Board, No. 2608, pp. 46–57. Mathew, J., J. C. Medina, and R.F. Benekohal. 2015. Accident Prediction Models Using Micro and Macro Scale Analysis, 9 Month Progress Report. University of Minnesota, Road Safety Institute. Minneapolis. Medina, J. C., and R. F. Benekohal. 2015. Macroscopic Models for Acci- dent Prediction at Railroad Grade Crossings: Comparisons with U.S. Department of Transportation Accident Prediction Formula. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2476, pp. 85–93. Medina, J. C., S. Shen, and R. F. Benekohal. 2016. Micro and Macro Level Safety Analysis at Railroad Grade Crossings. https://rosap. ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/30849. Minnesota Department of Transportation (DOT). 2014. Report on the Improvements to Highway-Rail Grade Crossings and Rail Safety, December 2014. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/govrel/reports/2014/

45 CBRCrossingStudy-December2014/ReportonHwy-RailXingsand RailSafety-2014.pdf. Minnesota DOT. 2012. Integrated Corridor Management: A Review on the Theory and Practice. Transportation Research Synthesis 1210, pp. 1–9. National Fire Protection Association. 2010. Standard for the Organi- zation and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emer- gency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments. Quincy, Mass. Nichelson, Jr., G. Rex, and G. L. Reed. 1999. Grade Separations: When Do We Separate? Texas Transportation Institute, College Station. https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/ TTI-1999-12.pdf. Notice of Funding Opportunity for the Department of Transportation’s Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (INFRA Grants) for Fiscal Years 2017 and 2018. Docket DOT–OST–2017–0090. Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 127, July 5, 2017a. pp. 31135–31151. Notice of Funding Opportunity for the Department of Transporta- tion’s National Infrastructure Investments Under the Consoli- dated Appropriations Act, 2017. Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 172. September 7, 2017b. pp. 42426–42436. Peel Regional Council. 2014a. Improvements to At-Grade Rail Crossings: Prioritizing Crossings for Grade Separation. Recommendations report. Spring. https://www.peelregion.ca/pw/transportation/ goodsmovement/art/At-grade-Rail-Crossings.pdf. Peel Regional Council. 2014b. “Improvements to At Grade Rail Cross- ings: Prioritizing Crossings for Grade Separation.” November. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201200111. Roper, B. A., and D. M. Keltner. 1999. User Benefits of Railroad Grade Separation in A Small Community: Practical Techniques for Apply- ing MICROBENCOST. 6thNational Conference on Transportation Planning for Small and Medium Sized Communities. doi: 10.1017/ CBO9781107415324.004. RSSB. 2010. Research Brief: Documenting the All Level Crossing Risk Model. T737. October. https://www.rssb.co.uk/library/research- development-and-innovation/research-brief-T737.pdf. Saccomanno, F. F., L. Fu and Luis Miranda. 2004. Risk-Based Model for Identifying Highway–Rail Grade Crossing Blackspots. Transporta- tion Research Record, No. 1862, pp. 127–135. Saint Louis Regional Freightway. 2016. Freight Development Project List. Draft. http://www.thefreightway.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2016/04/Freightway_DevelopmentPlan.pdf. Screening Tools for Considering Grade Separation at Rail-Highway Crossings. 2006. Journal of Transportation Engineering. Vol. 132, No. 1.1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245306867_ Screening_Tools_for_Considering_Grade_Separation_at_Rail- Highway_Crossings. Smith, S. A. 1999. NCHRP Report 435: Guidebook for Transportation Corridor Studies: A Process for Effective Decision-Making. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Taggart, R. C., P. Lauria, G. Groat, C. Rees, and A. Brick-Turin. 1987. NCHRP Report 288: Evaluating Grade-Separated Rail and Highway Crossing Alternatives. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Taylor, J., and R. Crawford. 2009. Prioritising Road–Rail Level Cross- ings for Grade Separation Using a Multicriteria Approach. http:// atrf.info/papers/2009/2009_Taylor_Crawford.pdf. U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). Infrastructure For Rebuilding America. USDOT Build America Bureau, Washing- ton D.C. 2018. https://www.transportation.gov/buildamerica/ infragrants. USDOT. 2017a. Freight Facts and Figures, 2017. USDOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington D.C. https://www.bts.gov/ bts-publications/freight-facts-and-figures/freight-facts-figures- 2017 Accessed February 21, 2018. USDOT. 2017b.Website–2017 TIGER Grant Applications FAQs: https://www.transportation.gov/tiger/2017-tiger-application-faqs. USDOT, Office of the Secretary. 2017 Benefit–Cost Analysis Guidance for Discretionary Grant Programs. July. https://www.transportation. gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/mission/office-policy/transportation- policy/284031/benefit-cost-analysis-guidance-2017_2.p.df USDOT, Research and Innovative Technology Administration. 2012. Integrated Corridor Management Analysis, Modeling, and Simula- tion Fact Sheet. May. https://www.its.dot.gov/factsheets/pdf/icm.pdf. USDOT, Federal Highway Administration, California Division, and California Department of Transportation. 2009. Systems Engineer- ing Guidebook for Intelligent Transportation Systems, Version 3.0. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/cadiv/segb/files/segbversion3.pdf. Washington, Joint Transportation Committee. 2016. Request for Propos- als. Prioritization of Prominent Road-Rail Conflicts in Washington State. Olympia. Wilbur Smith Associates. 2011. Kern County Grade Separation Prioriti- zation Report. Kern Council of Governments. March. http://www. kerncog.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Grade_Sep_Priority_ Report.pdf.