National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Conclusions and Gaps in the Body of Knowledge
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Value, Benefits, and Limitations of Qualifications-Based Selection for Airport Project Delivery. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25641.
×
Page 41
Page 42
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Value, Benefits, and Limitations of Qualifications-Based Selection for Airport Project Delivery. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25641.
×
Page 42
Page 43
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Value, Benefits, and Limitations of Qualifications-Based Selection for Airport Project Delivery. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25641.
×
Page 43

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

41 AASHTO. Guide for Design-Build Procurement, Washington, D.C., 2008. Airports Council International–North America, Airport Consultants Council (ACC), and Associated General Contractors of America (AGC). Airport Owners’ Guide to Project Delivery Systems, 2nd ed. Joint Committee of the ACI–NA, ACC, and AGC, 2012. Alinger, M. Recent Developments in Task and Delivery Order Contracting, Public Contract Law Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2010, pp. 839–852. Alleman, D., A. Antoine, D. D. Gransberg, and K. R. Molenaar. A Comparison of Qualifications Based-Selection and Best Value Procurement for Construction Manager/General Contractor Highway Construction, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2630, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2017, pp. 59–67. American Institute of Architects. Construction Manager-at-Risk State Statute Compendium, Washington, D.C., 2005. American Institute of Architects, California Council. Integrated Project Delivery: An Updated Working Defini- tion, Sacramento, CA, 2014. Assaf, S. A., and S. Al-Hejji. Causes of Delay in Large Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2006, pp. 349–357. Barutha, P. J., and E. Scheepbouwer. Value for Money on a Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Project: An International Comparative Analysis, TRB 95th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Paper No. 16-3226, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016. Barutha, P., I. Karaca, M. Pinto-Nunez, and D. D. Gransberg. Project Risk Perception on Public Private Partner- ship Projects, Compendium 2016 Presented at 98th Annual Meeting, Paper No. 19-04767, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2019. Beard, L. J., M. C. Loulakis, and C. E. Wundram. Design-Build: Planning Through Development, 1st ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001, p. 10. Bearup, W., M. Kenig, and J. O’Donnell. Alternative Delivery Methods, a Primer, Proceedings, Airport Board Members and Commissioners Annual Conference, Airports Council International–North America, Chicago, Ill., 2007. Castro-Nova, I., G. M. Gad, A. Touran, B. Cetin, and D. D. Gransberg. Evaluating the Influence of Differing Geotechnical Risk Perceptions on Design-Build Highway Projects, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2018, doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000993. Cohen, J. Integrated Project Delivery: Case Studies AIA. A Joint Project of American Institute of Architects, California Council Integrated Project Delivery Steering Committee, National Integrated Practice Discussion Group, Sacramento, Calif., 2010. Delaware Code, Public Works Contracting, Title 29, Chapter 69 (29 Del. C. § 6962), 2001. Design-Build Institute of America. Design-Build Manual of Practice, DBIA, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 6–35. El Wardani, M., J. Messner, and M. Horman. Comparing Procurement Methods for Design-Build Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, No. 3, 2006, pp. 230–238. Ernzen, J., and T. Feeney. Contractor-Led Quality Control and Quality Assurance Plus Design-Build: Who Is Watching the Quality? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1813, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 253–259. FAA. National Policy: Airport Improvement Program Handbook, 2014, https://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/ aip_handbook/media/AIP-Handbook-Order-5100-38D.pdf. Farris, D. Checking Your Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) IQ, The Construction Lawyer, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2002, p. 24. References

42 Value, Benefits, and Limitations of Qualifications-Based Selection for Airport Project Delivery FHWA. Successful Practices for P3s, A Review of What Works When Delivering Transportation Via Public-Private Partnerships. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2016. Gad, G. M., S. A. Adamtey, and D. D. Gransberg. Trends in Quality Management Approaches to Design-Build Transportation Projects, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2504, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 87–92. General Accounting Office. Using Structured Interviewing Techniques, GAO/PEMD-10.1.5, Washington, D.C., June 1991, 191 pp. General Services Administration. How to Sell to the Government—Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity Contracts, December 2013. [Online] Available: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/103926 [accessed July 6, 2014]. Gransberg, D. D., and C. Riemer. NCHRP Synthesis 390: Performance-Based Construction Contractor Pre- qualification, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, 101 pp. Gransberg, D. D., and J. Shane. NCHRP Synthesis 402: Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, 137 pp. Gransberg, D., J. Shane, J. Schierholz, S. Anderson, C. Puerto, D. Pittenger, and J. McMinimee. A Guidebook for Construction Manager-at-Risk Contracting for Highway Projects, NCHRP Report 10-85 Final Research Report, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013. Gransberg, D. D., M. C. Loulakis, and G. M. Gad. NCHRP Synthesis 455: Alternative Technical Concepts for Contract Delivery Methods, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014. Gransberg, D. D., J. A. Rueda-Benavides, and M. C. Loulakis. NCHRP Synthesis 473: Indefinite Delivery/ Indefinite Quantity Contracting Practices, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2015. Gransberg, D. D., H. Jeong, C. Harper, S. DeWitt, C. Lopes del Puerto, M. Pinto-Nunez, E. Scheepbouwer. AASHTO Partnering Handbook, Second Edition, NCHRP 19-10 Final Research Report, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2017. Gransberg, D. D., M. C. Loulakis, A. Touran, G. M. Gad, K. McLain, S. Sweitzer, D. M. Pittenger, and I. Castro Nova. NCHRP Web-Only Document 247: Managing Geotechnical Risk in Design-Build Projects, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2018. Ibbs, C., Y. Kwak, T. Ng, and A. Odabasi. Project Delivery Systems and Project Change: Quantitative Analysis, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 129, No. 4, 2003, pp. 382–387. International Air Transport Association. Annual Review 2018, Sydney, Australia, 2018. https://www.iata.org/ publications/Documents/iata-annual-review-2018.pdf. Kenig, M. E. Project Delivery Systems for Construction, 3rd ed., Associated General Contractors of America, 2011. Kwak, Y. H., and R. Bushey. Construction Management at Risk: An Innovative Project Delivery Method at Stormwater Treatment Area in the Everglades, Florida, Proceedings, Construction Congress VI, Orlando, Fla., 2000, pp. 477–482. Lingard, H., W. Hughes, and E. Chinyio. The Impact of Contractor Selection Method on Transaction Costs: A Review, Journal of Construction Procurement, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1998, pp. 89–102. Loulakis, M. C. A Look at Progressive Design-Build in the Water Sector, Water Finance & Management, 2013 [Online] Available: https://waterfm.com/progressive-designbuild [accessed July 26, 2018]. Minchin, R. E., Jr., and G. R. Smith. NCHRP Web Document 38: Quality-Based Performance Rating of Contractors for Prequalification and Bidding Purposes, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001. Minchin, E., K. Thakkar, and R. Ellis. Miami Intermodal Center—Introducing CM-at-Risk to Transportation Construction. In Innovative Project Delivery Systems, K. R. Molenaar and G. Yakowenko, eds., ASCE Press, Reston, Va., 2007, pp. 46–59. Minnesota Department of Administration, Glossary of Common Procurement Terms. Materials Management Division (MMD), 2007. Molenaar, K. R., D. D. Gransberg, T. McCuen, S. Korkmaz, M. Horman, and N. Sobin. Sustainable High- Performance Buildings and Project Delivery Methods: A State-of-the Practice Report, White Paper, Charles Pankow Foundation and Design-Build Institute of America, Ontario, California, 2009. Mollaoglu, S., Garcia, A., Kalbhor, H., and Polkington, B. ACRP Research Report 196: Guidebook for Integrating Collaborative Partnering into Traditional Airport Practices, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2019. National Institute of Government Purchasing. Qualifications-Based Selection for Architectural & Engineering Services, Public Procurement Practice, 2012.

References 43 Neuendorf, K. A. The Content Analysis Guidebook. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2002. New South Wales Department of Commerce. Contractor Prequalification and Best Practice Accreditation Scheme for Construction and Related Works, Sydney, Australia, November 2007. Oppenheim, A. N. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. Continuum, London, 2000. Pinilla, M. Cost Overestimates a Detriment to Airport Construction and Maintenance Projects, Independent Project Analysis, 2018. [Online] Available: https://www.ipaglobal.com/news/article/cost-overestimates-a- detriment-to-airport-construction-maintenance-projects-2 [accessed March 24, 2018]. Prichard, R. Contractor Qualification, International Risk Management Institute, 2000. [Online] Available: https://www.irmi.com/articles/expert-commentary/contractor-qualification. Rueda, J. A. Develop a Price Escalation Method for Minnesota Department of Transportation Indefinite Delivery/ Indefinite Quantity: AxE Bidding, Master’s Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, 2013, 173 pp. Rueda, J. A., and D. D. Gransberg. Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracting: A Case Study Analysis, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2408, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 17–25. Russell, J. S., and E. J. Jaselskis. Quantitative Study of Contractor Evaluation Programs and Their Impact, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 118, 1992, pp. 612–624. Scott, S., K. R. Molenaar, D. D. Gransberg, and N. C. Smith. NCHRP Report 561: Best-Value Procurement Methods for Highway Construction Projects, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. Shields, M. D. Glossary of Federal Acquisition Terms, Federal Acquisition Institute, Washington, D.C., December 1998. State of Washington. Design-Build Best Practices Guidelines, Capital Projects Advisory Review Board, 2017. Available: http://des.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/documents/About/CPARB/2017Meetings/11-Nov/ DBBP-Guidelines_LegReport.pdf [accessed July 26, 2018]. Touran, A., D. D. Gransberg, K. R. Molenaar, K. Ghavamifar, D. J. Mason, and L. A. Fithian. TCRP Web-Only Document 41: Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. Touran, A., D. D. Gransberg, K. R. Molenaar, P. Bakhshi, and K. Ghavamifar. ACRP Report 21: A Guidebook for Selecting Airport Capital Project Delivery Methods, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009a. Touran, A., D. D. Gransberg, K. R. Molenaar, P. Bakhshi, and K. Ghavamifar. ACRP Web-Only Document 6: Evaluation and Selection of Airport Capital Project Delivery Methods, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009b. Touran, A., D. D. Gransberg, K. R. Molenaar, K. Ghavamifar, D. J. Mason, and L. Fithian. TCRP Report 131: A Guidebook for the Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009c. Tran, D., C. Harper, and R. E. Minchin. NCHRP Synthesis 504: Strategic Program Delivery Methods, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2017. U.S. DOT. Report to Congress on Public–Private Partnerships, 2004. Weber, R. P. Basic Content Analysis. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 1985. Yin, R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2008.

Next: Glossary »
Value, Benefits, and Limitations of Qualifications-Based Selection for Airport Project Delivery Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

About $1.5 trillion will be spent globally on airport infrastructure by 2030, according to the International Air Transport Association. Most of that enormous amount of money will be spent on projects that must be constructed without disrupting airport operations.

Given the focus on schedule and on the cost of failing to complete the construction during the periods of planned outages, the need for a highly qualified construction contractor with a proven record of timely and quality production is key to the success of airport projects across the globe.

The TRB Airport Cooperative Research Program's ACRP Synthesis 102: Value, Benefits, and Limitations of Qualifications-Based Selection for Airport Project Delivery aims to benchmark the state of the practice with respect to the use of qualifications-based selection (QBS) to award construction projects.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!