National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 Concluding Comments
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1997. Disability Evaluation Study Design: First Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5834.
×

References

Adler, M. Federal Disability Programs. Encyclopedia of Financial Gerontology, 1996.


Cohen, S.B., and Carlson, B.L. Comparison of Household and Medical Provider Reporting Expenditures in the 1987 Medical Expenditures Survey. Journal of Official Statistics, Statistics Sweden 10(1):3-29, 1994.


DHHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). The Social Security Disability Insurance Program: An Analysis. Report of the Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C., December 1992. (Unpublished.)

Duncan, G.T., Jabine, T.B., and deWolf, V.A. Private Lives and Public Policies: Confidentiality and Accessibility of Government Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1993.


GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). Social Security Disability: SSA Quality Assurance Improvements Can Produce More Accurate Payments. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-94-107. Washington, D.C.: GAO, June 1994.

GAO. Social Security Disability: Management Action and Program Redesign Needed to Address Long-Standing Problems. Testimony by Jane L. Ross to the Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee of the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-95-233. Washington, D.C.: GAO, August 3, 1995.

GAO. SSA Disability Engineering: Project Magnitude and Complexity Impede Implementation. Testimony by Diana S. Eisenstat to the Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee of the Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Pub. No. GAO/HEHS-96-211. Washington, D.C.: GAO, September 12, 1996.

Groves, R.M. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: John Wiley, 1989.


Hartley, H.O. Multiple Frame Surveys. Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, 1962, pp. 203-206.


LaPlante, M.P. Disability Risks of Chronic Illnesses and Impairments. Disability Statistics Report (2). Washington, D.C.: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education, June 1991.

LaPlante, M.P., and Carlson, D. Disability in the United States: Prevalence and Causes, 1992. Disability Statistics Report (7). Washington, D.C.: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education, July 1996.

Lepkowski, J.M., and Groves, R.M. A Mean Squared Error Model for Dual Frame, Mixed Mode Survey Design. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(396):930-937, 1986.

Lessler, J.T., and Kalsbeek, W.D. Nonsampling Error in Surveys, New York: John Wiley, 1992.

Lund, R.E. Estimates in Multiple Frame Surveys. Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, 1968, pp. 282-288.


McNeil, J.M. Americans With Disabilities: 1991-1992. Data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, P70-33. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1993.


NCHS (National Center for Health Statistics). Plan and Operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-94. Vital and Health Statistics 1(32). Hyattsville, MD.: NCHS, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1994.

NCHS. Current Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1994. Vital and Health Statistics 10 (193). Hyattsville, MD.: NCHS, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1995.


Schuman, H., and Presser, S. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1997. Disability Evaluation Study Design: First Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5834.
×

Smith, T.W. Context Effects in the General Survey. In Biemer, P.P., Groves, R.M., Lyberg, L.E., Mathiowetz, N.A., and Sudman, S., eds., Measurement Errors in Surveys. New York: John Wiley, 1991, pp. 57-71.

SSA (Social Security Administration). Plan for a New Disability Claim Process . Washington, D.C.: SSA, September 1994.

SSA. Annual Statistical Supplement, 1996 to the Social Security Bulletin. Washington, D.C.: SSA, September 1996a.

SSA. Draft Scope of Work: The Disability Evaluation Study. Washington, D.C.: SSA, July 30, 1996b. (Unpublished.)

SSA. Research Plan for the Development of a Redesigned Method of Evaluating Disability in Social Security Claims. Federal Register 61 (175):47542-47544, September 9, 1996c.

Tanur, J.M., ed. Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1991.

Thornberry, O.T., and Massey, J.T. Trends in United States Telephone Coverage Across Time and Subgroups. In Groves R.M., Biemer, P.P., Lyberg, L.E., Massey, J.T., Nicholls, W.L., and Waksberg, J., eds., Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: John Wiley, 1988, pp. 25-49.

Turner, C.F., and Martin, E. Surveying Subjective Phenomena. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1984.


Westat, Inc. Including the Homeless and the Institutionalized Populations in the Medical Evaluation Study: A Discussion of Issues. Draft report submitted to the Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics, Washington, D.C., January 1995a. (Unpublished.)

Westat, Inc. Planning and Developing a Protocol for the Medical Evaluation Study. Final Report to the Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics, Washington, D.C., April 1995b. (Unpublished.)

Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1997. Disability Evaluation Study Design: First Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5834.
×
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"References." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1997. Disability Evaluation Study Design: First Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5834.
×
Page 31
Next: Appendix: Review of the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research »
Disability Evaluation Study Design: First Interim Report Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $21.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!