A
List of Presentations to the Panel
MEETINGS OF THE PANEL ON THE REVIEW OF THE OIL RECOVERY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Edith Allison, Department of Energy, Bartlesville Project Office, Oklahoma
Overview of the reservoir class oil recovery program: who is doing what where?
DOE review of proposals
M. Lee Allison, Utah Geological Survey
Developing improved completion techniques in the Bluebell Field plus aspects of Class II and III projects
Roger N. Anderson, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, New York; Lana Billeaud, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, New York; Larry Cathles, Cornell University, New York; and Peter Flemings, Pennsylvania State University
Dynamic enhanced recovery technologies
Sami Bou-Mikael, Texaco E&P, Inc., New Orleans
Post waterflood CO2miscible flood in light oil fluvial dominated deltaic reservoirs
Thomas D. Coffman, Cielo Energy Corporation, Texas
Perceptions and experience of an independent operator
William L. Fisher, University of Texas at Austin
Use of the “reservoir class” as an organizing concept
Travis Gillham and Reza Fassihi, Amoco Production Company, Houston; and Edward Turek, Amoco Exploration and Production Technology Group, Tulsa
West Hackberry tertiary project
Don W. Green, University of Kansas
Improvement of oil recovery in fluvial dominated deltaic reservoirs in Kansas - Class I project, and improved oil recovery in Lower Meramecian (Mississippian) carbonate reservoirs of Kansas - near term - Class II project
J. C. (Chris) Hall, Chairman, Petroleum Technology Transfer Council, Washington, D.C.
Technology transfer activities and plans
George Hirasaki, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Rice University, Texas
The oil recovery program in Norway
Mohan G. Kelkar, University of Tulsa
Integrated approach towards the application of horizontal wells to improve waterflooding performance
John Lomax, Lomax Exploration Company, Laguna Beach, California; and Miland Deo, University of Utah
Green River Formation water flood demonstration project
Kenneth Luff, Luff Exploration Company, Colorado
Improved recovery demonstration for Williston Basin carbonates
Charles Mankin, Oklahoma Geological Survey
Identification and evaluation of fluvial-dominated deltaic reservoirs
Todd Martinez, Michael Collins, and Lance Cole, BDM-Oklahoma
BDM management of Class 4 programs and management of technology transfer
Lee McRae and Mark Holtz, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin
Revitalizing mature oil plays in Frio reservoirs of South Texas
Keith Miles, Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center, DOE
Contract awards/negotiations
P. K. Pande, Fina Oil and Chemical Company, Texas
Application of integrated reservoir management and reservoir characterization to optimize infill drilling
Reginal W. Spiller, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Gas and Petroleum Technologies, Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
Overview of the program, DOE Office of Fossil Energy
James O. Stephens, Hughes Eastern Corporation, Mississippi
The utilization of the microflora indigenous to and present in oil-bearing formations to selectively plug the more porous zones thereby increasing oil recovery during waterflooding
Archie Taylor, OXY USA, Midland, Texas; Jim Justice, Advanced Research Technology; and Scott Hickman, Hickman & Associates, Houston, Texas
Application of reservoir characterization and advanced technology to improve recovery and economics in lower quality shallow shelf San Andres reservoirs - Class II
Noel Tyler, Director, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin
Background on definition of reservoir classes
Don R. Wier and Larry Hallenbeck, Phillips Petroleum Co., Odessa, Texas
Design and implementation of a CO2flood utilizing advanced reservoir characterization and horizontal injection wells in a shallow shelf carbonate approaching waterflood depletion - Class II
James R. Wood, University of South Florida and Michigan Technical University
Recovery of bypassed oil in the Dundee formation using horizontal drains