Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 6-57

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 6...
... 6 REVIEW OF TIM DEFINITIONS, STRATEGIES, AND EVALUATION METHODS The first activity in support of NCHRP 03-108 is reviewing existing TIM evaluation methods, and cataloging frequently used definitions, classifications, and parameters employed in evaluations. This review effort documents operational efficiencies gained through the coordinated activities among partners within a TIM program and catalogs performance measure definitions, methods, and assumptions found in TIM literature.
From page 7...
... 7 attention. Significant literature highlights best practices for TIM activities, including the TIM Handbook (Owens, 2010)
From page 8...
... 8  program resources and funding  methods for measuring progress Examples of the partnerships, multidisciplinary team training, and TIM progress abound. The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Incident Management Task Force (IMTF)
From page 9...
... 9 formalized through operational agreements, joint operational polices, and joint training exercises. The most commonly cited areas of multi-agency coordination in the literature were forming a defined team that regularly meets to discuss and plan for TIM activities and multi-agency training and exercises.
From page 10...
... 10 "The Move Over, America" Campaign was the first coordinated national effort to educate Americans about "Move Over" laws and how they help protect the law enforcement officers who risk their lives protecting the public (http://www.moveoveramerica.com)
From page 11...
... 11 Another exception is Georgia's Towing and Recovery Incentive Program (TRIP) which pays qualified heavy duty towing and recovery companies monetary bonuses for clearing large commercial vehicle incidents within 90 minutes.
From page 12...
... 12 effectiveness of FSP as an incident management tools depends on several factors including incident frequency and characteristics, freeway operational characteristics and FSP implementation. The FSP benefits would be significant on freeway segments with narrow (or no)
From page 13...
... 13 Tactical clearance and recovery activities include:  Expedited Crash Investigation  Service Patrols  Vehicle-Mounted Push Bumpers  Towing and Recovery Quick Clearance Incentives  Major Incident Response Teams 2.1.3. Support TIM Activities Support TIM strategies include technology implementation and upgrades, data integration, and cost or recovery management.
From page 14...
... 14 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 4 has deployed an Interagency Video Event Data Distribution System (iVEDDS)
From page 15...
... 15 However, nearly all public agencies collect data on incident management for cost management purposes (Rensel, 2012)
From page 16...
... 16 In 2013 National Cooperative Highway Research Program embarked upon developing guidelines for the implementation of TIM performance measures (Pecheux and Lomax, 2013) , focusing on principles of performance measurement.
From page 17...
... 17 vehicles, spilled cargo, highway maintenance and reconstruction projects, and special nonemergency events." Conversely, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) defines a traffic incident conservatively as an "emergency road user occurrence, a natural disaster, or other unplanned event that affects or impedes the normal flow of traffic." This definition precludes both maintenance and planned special events.
From page 18...
... 18 characteristics such as time of day, geographical location, type of vehicles involved, or severity of injuries incurred." The number of incidents over a defined period of time can also quantify TMC workload. The incident count metric can capture the effects of specific TIM strategies.
From page 19...
... 19  Location: left shoulder, divide, in-lane, and right shoulder  Response: assisted, unassisted  Assist Activity: mechanical/electrical, out of gas, flat tire, debris, accident, and other Incident Type. Incident type varies depending on the definition of traffic incidents.
From page 20...
... 20 Agency/System or TIM Incident Type Source Washington DOT/Incident Response (IR) Teams Fatality collision, Injury collision, Non-injury collision, Abandoned vehicle, Disabled vehicle, Debris, Police activity, and Other Yinhai et al., 2011 Law enforcement and emergency response incident classifications focus on the number and severity of potential injuries and equipment required of the event.
From page 21...
... 21 Some agencies go as far as to define incidents based on the level of response. Caltrans defines major incidents as "An unplanned non-recurring event that reduces highway capacity that requires both the California Highway Patrol and Caltrans to respond to the incident scene" (Chu, 2010)
From page 22...
... 22 Kabengele in 1994 applied a broad temporal and spatial range–one hour after the primary accident and within three miles upstream of the primary accident– and noted anywhere from 5% to 14% of accidents are secondary. This range reflected years 1991 and 1992 on four Maryland facilities –US 50, I-95, I-495, and I-695.
From page 23...
... 23 "Of all accidents, 7.5% had associated secondary incidents, 1.5% of disabled vehicles had secondary incidents, and 0.9% of abandoned vehicles had secondary incidents. The study also found that a 10-minute increase in primary incident duration is associated with 15% higher odds of secondary incidents." 2.2.3.
From page 24...
... 24 by the University of Maryland (Chang and Raqib, 2013) , the evaluation of detection focuses on the distribution of detection sources.
From page 25...
... 25  Health departments Conklin et al.
From page 26...
... 26 2.2.6. Roadway Clearance Time Roadway clearance time is one of the three TIM program performance measures identified by FHWA.
From page 27...
... 27 considered acceptable as a last responder. Recorded incident clearance metrics sometimes include the queue dissipation time.
From page 28...
... 28 While assumed percentage of total incident is easiest to apply, it is also the coarsest in estimating true secondary incidents. Filtering provides a better estimate; however, the filter specification (temporal and spatial)
From page 29...
... 29 examined in detail in each subsection below beginning with a summary table noting the TIM outcomes that are quantified and monetized. Section 5 of this document summarizes the federal direction for transforming outcomes to monetized benefits.
From page 30...
... 30 𝐶 0.42 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑠1.87 𝑓𝑜𝑟 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑦 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑘𝑠 The change in vehicle miles traveled (VM) and change in congestion delay (CD)
From page 31...
... 31 Next, the resulting time duration in queue with and without (baseline) TIM was calculated using the getaway capacity, reduced capacity and demand flow as inputs in the following equations: 𝑡 𝑡 𝜇 𝜇𝜇 𝜆 𝑡 𝑡 𝜇 𝜇𝜇 𝜆 Where: 𝑡 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑢𝑒 𝑇𝐼𝑀 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛,𝐹𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑇𝐼𝑀 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝜆 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑡 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑢𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 It is worth noting that a separate calculation for time duration in queue was suggested for an incident with partial clearance occurring before complete clearance.
From page 32...
... 32 2.3.3. Rutgers Incident Management System (RIMS)
From page 33...
... 33 Table 8: Incident Management Assistance Patrols Decision-Support Tool for Service Expansion Estimation Framework Outcomes Outcome Estimated? Estimation Method Outcome Monetized?
From page 34...
... 34 consist of North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) GIS shapefiles and NCDOT crash and inventory data.
From page 36...
... 36 conditions. The impact area, shown in Figure 5, was defined by spatial and temporal impact boundaries estimated using regression models.
From page 37...
... 37 Figure 6: Three Stage Time Savings Analysis for TIM (Chou, 2010)
From page 38...
... 38 2.3.7. Methodology for Quantifying the Cost Effectiveness of Freeway Service Patrol Programs: Hudson Valley Highway Emergency Local Patrol Hagani et al.
From page 39...
... 39 cost ratio analysis indicates that for segments which are similar to the study area, HELP program implementation was recommended only for volumes values greater than 1500 passenger cars per hour per lane (Level of Service C)
From page 40...
... 40 Table 12: Assessing Return on Investment of Freeway Safety Service Patrol Programs Estimation Framework Outcomes Outcome Estimated? Estimation Method Outcome Monetized?
From page 41...
... 41 2.3.9. A Benefit Cost Model for Traffic Incident Management, Knoxville, TN The study by Moss (2012)
From page 42...
... 42 Next, the reduction in available capacity from the incident was used to calibrate the model so the measured delays could be plotted on the queuing diagram. To do so, a range of available capacity by lane blockage was suggested.
From page 43...
... 43 nationwide survey of multiple incident management agencies. The study also evaluated the specific impact of traffic incident on both motorists and the environment on South Carolina freeways by using traffic simulation and benefit-cost analysis.
From page 44...
... 44 Table 15: Evaluated Incident Clearance Strategies in Chowdhury et al.
From page 45...
... 45 Table 16: Evaluation of Arterial Service Patrol Programs (I-64 Traffic Response) Estimation Framework Outcomes Outcome Estimated?
From page 46...
... 46 Department of Natural Resources. Finally, $57,977 was saved by having the safety service patrol respond without having to call on police, highway employees, or others.
From page 47...
... 47 at the time of incident such as volume and speed, and 3) response and clearance information of MA and non-MA scenario.
From page 48...
... 48 the calculation of the benefit-cost ratio such as reductions in air pollutant emissions. In addition, the presence of Road Ranger service provides a sense of security on the freeway, and the quicker removal of incidents could reduce secondary accidents.
From page 49...
... 49 Table 20: FIRST Benefits and Costs in 2003 Dollars (Mn/DOT, 2004)
From page 50...
... 50 Analysis determined that CHART's services in 2012 reduced delays by 28.47 million vehiclehours. The incident-related traffic delay model is as follow: Sample Incident Delay = Traffic delay with an incident – traffic delay without an incident Incident Delay = f(incident duration, traffic volume, No.
From page 51...
... 51 Table 22: Results of Service Patrol Benefit-Cost Studies (Lin, 2012)   The Tool for Operations Benefit/Cost (TOPS-BC)
From page 52...
... 52  Revised Departmental Guidance on Treatment of the Economic Value of a Statistical Life in U.S. Department of Transportation Analyses (2013)
From page 53...
... 53 2.4.3. Crash Costs The U.S.
From page 54...
... 54 Although these values do reflect the value of the driver's time, they do not reflect the total time value of the freight-hauling truck. In the passenger vehicle, the passengers are the valuable things being carried, and so we use their earning power to establish time value for the passenger vehicle.
From page 55...
... 55 2.4.5. Occupancy Ratios As shown in the table below, the 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS)
From page 56...
... 56 2.4.8. Travel Time Reliability Value of reliability -- cost of unexpected delay -- is an important element of time cost, but there is no official guidance on this point.
From page 57...
... 57 The next step of the project was to select specific methods that quantify and monetize TIM benefits for testing, using data sets from several regions within the U.S. The team developed broad TIM profiles for several state stakeholders and engaged each state to identify the range and time horizon of data for possible analysis.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.