Skip to main content

Preserving Public Trust Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs (2001) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:


Pages 6-9

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 6...
... First, the accreditation standards should be formulated in a "bootstrap" process, with strong feedback between the formulation of standards and direct experience with the implementation of HRPPP standards. Second, accreditation bodies should be accountable for their standards as well as their accreditation processes.
Read the entire page →
From page 7...
... It is not clear, however, how standards should be applied to nonbiomedical research settings, contract management organizations, clinical trials cooperative groups, independent IRBs, central IRBs, site management organizations, or units of research sponsors that conduct human research (e.g., research units within federal agencies and private pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and device companies)
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • human research
  • accreditation process
  • accreditation standards
  • independent irbs
  • accreditation bodies

  • clinical trials
  • human participants
  • research sponsors
  • proposed standards
  • accreditation programs

  • research involving
  • health centers
  • pilot testing
  • academic health
  • involving human

  • regulatory standards
  • hrppp standards
  • pilot tests
  • growing fraction
  • independent irb

  • standards proposed
  • research institution
  • existing regulatory
  • research sponsor
  • accreditation processes

  • clinical trial
  • trials cooperative
  • appear promising
  • facilities appear
  • strongest basis


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.