Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix A: Data Sources and Literature Review Findings
Pages 135-142

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 135...
... The committee invited experts to make public presentations, commissioned background papers, and sought additional expert technical assistance from knowledgeable individuals. LITERATURE REVIEW Search Terms The committee began its review by conducting a preliminary literature search.
From page 136...
... Research misconduct Research moral and ethical aspect Research norms Research productivity Research standards Responsibility in research Retraction of publication Scientific error Scientific fraud Scientific integrity Scientific misconduct Selection bias University-industry relationships Whistle-blowers White-collar crime Databases Searches were performed in OVID in the following databases: AGRICOLA, BioethicsLine, Biosis Previews, CSA-Life Science, ERIC, Medline, PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts, and Wilson/Biological and Agricultural Index (a description of OVID and of each of the databases can be found at http://www.ovid.com/products/databases/index.cfm)
From page 137...
... The committee's search revealed a trend similar to that identified by Steneck (2000) , in that several journals stand out as leaders in publishing articles on research integrity and the research environment, including Science, the Journal of TABLE A-2 Number of Relevant Articles, by Journal Journal Number of Relevant Articles Sctence Journal of the American Medical Association Academic Medicine Science ~ Engineering Ethics BMJ (British Medical Journal)
From page 138...
... In addition, Institute of Medicine staff attended professional scientific meetings and symposia during the course of the study to bring back the latest information about integrity in research issues for the committee's review. Among the meetings attended were the Research Conference on Research Integrity, sponsored by ORI; the Medical Research Summit,
From page 139...
... TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE The committee sought additional expert technical assistance over the course of the study via phone, e-mail, and personal communications with the following individuals: Barbara Brittingham, New England Association of Schools and Colleges; Steven Crow, North Central Association of Colleges and Schools; Beth Fisher, University of Pittsburgh; Alasdair MacIntyre, Notre Dame University; lean Morse, Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools; George Peterson, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology; lames Rogers, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools; David Smith, The Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions; David Stevens, Liaison Committee on Medical Education; and Naomi Zigmond, University of Pittsburgh. COMMISSIONED PAPERS The committee commissioned several background papers for the committee's use.2 David H
From page 140...
... J Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, was commissioned to write a review of the changes with regard to research integrity that have taken place in the 10 years since publication of the National Academy of Sciences' report Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process (NAS, 1992~.
From page 141...
... empirical assessments of the moral climate in institutions and (2) empirical evaluations of pedagogical approaches to the teaching of research ethics.
From page 142...
... Investigating Research Integrity: Proceedings of the First ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity, November 2000. [Online]


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.