Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Air Force Science and Technology Program Changes (2003) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Appendix F: Biennial Iterative Review of the 6.2 and 6.3 Programs at the Margin
Pages 63-64

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 63...
... Those shown in the following list are the individuals who could conduct the iterative review: · Co-chairs: Director, Air Force Strategic Planning, and AFRL Commander · Members: Directors of Requirements for ACC, AMC, AFSPC, AFSOC, and AFMC Observer: SAF/AQRT · Advisors: Directors of Development (Capability) Planning for AF Product and Logistic Centers and members of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board (SAB)
Read the entire page →
From page 64...
... After the first cycle, the Air Force could document the lessons learned and institutionalize the process.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • afrl pom
  • applied technology
  • force vision
  • force materiel
  • biennium industry

  • detailed view
  • associated thinking
  • iterative review
  • program objectives
  • detailed knowledge

  • senior leadership
  • contribute detailed
  • force senior
  • afrl commander
  • pom indicates

  • biennial program
  • sufficient change
  • appg funding
  • funding line
  • logistic centers

  • cyclein preparation
  • iterative reviews
  • opportunities offered
  • intimately familiar
  • major commands

  • afrl ranks
  • quality review
  • annual planning
  • force scientific
  • materiel command


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.