Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 83-92

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 83...
... 83 4 Reconsidering Available Storage Options The planning framework, boundary conditions, and planning constraints that are found in the Restoration Plan are themselves the result of a process of adaptation to the interests and concerns of the myriad stakeholders in south Florida. The constraints and conditions that emerged during the initial stages of planning were necessary to allow the project to move forward.
From page 84...
... 84 Re-Engineering Water Storage in the Everglades: Risks and Opportunities EVERGLADES AGRICULTURAL AREA The Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) immediately south of Lake Okeechobee is characterized by rich peat soils (histosols)
From page 85...
... Reconsidering Available Storage Options 85 compared with any of the Great Lakes. It also has been the center of many controversies in recent decades concerning its function in the larger system and the most appropriate strategies for its management (e.g., Steinman et al., 2001; Havens, 2002; Bachmann et al., 2003)
From page 86...
... 86 Re-Engineering Water Storage in the Everglades: Risks and Opportunities The hydrology and morphometry of Lake Okeechobee and its drainage basin have been modified greatly over the past 125 years, and the current system bears little resemblance to conditions that existed when early explorers visited the region in the early and mid-nineteenth century (Tebeau, 1971, 1974)
From page 87...
... Reconsidering Available Storage Options 87 By early 1883, the natural flood channel toward the Caloosahatchee River had been widened to a shallow canal (Leach et al., 1971)
From page 88...
... 88 Re-Engineering Water Storage in the Everglades: Risks and Opportunities early 1970s. The primary focus of this work has been on nutrient-related water-quality issues.
From page 89...
... Reconsidering Available Storage Options 89 The former issue is complicated by the spatial and temporal variability of nutrient levels in this large lake; at different times and locations, either phosphorus or nitrogen may be the potentially limiting nutrient for planktonic primary production (e.g., Brezonik et al., 1979) , but light conditions usually are the actual limiting factor (Phlips et al., 1997; Bachmann et al., 2003)
From page 90...
... 90 Re-Engineering Water Storage in the Everglades: Risks and Opportunities ment with the Restoration Plan's proposed management plan for the lake (USACE and SFWMD, 2001; Havens, 2002) and is based on the findings of several earlier studies (Maceina, 1993; Havens 1997)
From page 91...
... Reconsidering Available Storage Options 91 Table 4-1 Relationship of Storage in Lake Okeechobee to Maximum Stage* Additional Storage Increase in Maximum Allowable Stage (ft.)
From page 92...
... 92 Re-Engineering Water Storage in the Everglades: Risks and Opportunities Given the above comments and the possibility that other storage options (e.g., ASR) may not provide the amounts of water needed to fulfill the restoration plan, the committee judges that it would be prudent to revisit the question of whether Lake Okeechobee can provide some of the sought-for water storage.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.