Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 15-26

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 15...
... 15C H A P T E R 2 Background ResearchThe objective of the SHRP 2 C02 effort was to develop a comprehensive performance measurement framework that would support collaborative decision making. To produce the framework, the research team took both a broad look at performance measurement and management and a more focused look at the application of specific performance measures in practice.
From page 16...
... Conservation Planning KDP KDP Key decision points take place along this process Source: ICF International, Inc., 2007. Figure 2.1.
From page 17...
... Developing performance-based program and project delivery.The focus also changes from considerations of system performance (mobility, safety, etc.) to organizational performance (project delivery, quality, etc.)
From page 18...
... Phases Potentially Relevant Phases With Limited Relevance Monitoring and Factors Design Permitting Construction Operations Objective Mobility Safety Environment Economics Community Other 18 ecify project completely se of environmental best practices se of public involvement best practices oject delivery (let on time, on budget) Permits from resource agencies Permit delivery Construct capital projects Work zone and reliability issues Work zone issues Environmental monitoring Project delivery (on time/on budget)
From page 19...
... A state DOT's strategic mission, vision, goals, and objectives are tied to day-to-day activities via regular review of performance results in core DOT business functions such as pavement and bridge preservation, transportation safety, traffic operations, and infrastructure maintenance. Performance-based management has three essential and interconnected components: program development, project delivery, and system monitoring and reporting: 1.
From page 20...
... NCHRP Report 446: A Guidebook for Performance-Based Transportation Planning provides practitioners an extensive library of measures organized by the following categories: • Accessibility; • Mobility; • Economic development; • Quality of life; • Environmental and resource conservation; • Safety; • Operation efficiency; • System preservation; and • Measures relevant to multiple goal categories (Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 2000)
From page 21...
... . The type of measures considered for transportation planning has grown to include not only those that consider input (time, capital, resources)
From page 22...
... Agency Type Agencies Contacted State DOT • Arizona Department of Transportation • Florida Department of Transportation • Minnesota Department of Transportation • Montana Department of Transportation • Ohio Department of Transportation • Oregon Department of Transportation • Pennsylvania Department of Transportation • Texas Department of Transportation • Virginia Department of Transportation • Washington Department of Transportation • Wisconsin Department of Transportation MPO • Atlanta Regional Commission (Atlanta, Georgia) • Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)
From page 23...
... level as part of long-range transportation plan development. Performance criteria by which projects are evaluated are typically well established and vetted, with more refined prioritization processes in place.
From page 24...
... . Travel demand models in use by most state DOTs and MPOs do an excellent job of demonstrating the congestion reduction potential of highway capacity-adding projects and generating VMT estimates commonly used in safety analyses, but are limited in their ability to demonstrate additional "off-model" benefits or impacts.
From page 25...
... to incorporate sustainability goals into the highway project delivery process, and New York now requires a greenhouse gas inventory to be completed by MPOs as part of transportation plan/program development. Though the trend is to expand the type of metrics included as part of project-level evaluation, transportation agencies are largely limited by data and tools needed to perform meaningful analyses.
From page 26...
... This shift has been particularly noticeable in wetlands research, where some of the most advanced practices now focus on the performance of mitigated wetlands, rather than simply the volume. In New Jersey, for example, the Department of Environmental Projection has developed the Wetland Mitigation Rapid Assessment Tool, which seeks to assess whether a mitigated wetland – natural or created – will perform "wetland functions" in the future.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.