Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 102-130

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 102...
... Separations OFA Centerline Wingtip Standard 324 ft Existing 284–300 ft Airport Ref Code D-VI Critical Aircraft Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Model B747-800 B747-800 ADG VI VI Wingspan 224' 224' Synopsis Based on AC 150/5300-13, Chapter 2, Table 2-3, the required taxiway to taxiway centerline separation to accommodate a Boeing B747-8 (i.e., ADG VI)
From page 103...
... Application of Methodology Risk Plot AA-7 Wingtip Sep 41 ft Severity Major Risk Level < 1.0E-09 Conclusion Low Risk Acceptable Restrictions Restrict simultaneous aircraft operation involving B747-800 aircraft on
From page 104...
... 23.5 ft (TWY/TWY) Severity Major Risk Level < 1.0E-09 < 1.0E-09 Conclusion Low Risk Acceptable
From page 105...
... MOS Issue Taxiway/ Taxiway Approval Date 3/6/2006 Separations OFA Centerline Wi ngtip Standard 215 ft Existing 154 ft 35 ft Airport Ref Code C-IV Critical Aircraft Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Model B757-300 B757-300 ADG IV IV Wi ngspan 125 ft 125 ft Synopsis In order to accommodate push-backs from Concourse B and for the aircraft to remain in the non-movement area without blocking Taxiway Q, a relocation/realignment of Taxiway Q was required. The proposed MOS was to relocate a portion of Taxiway Q between P2 and P3, moving it closer to Taxiway P
From page 106...
... Application of Methodology Risk Plot AA-7 Wingtip Sep 35 ft Severity Major Risk Level < 1.0E-09 Conclusion Low Risk Acceptable Case Study # 10 - Chicago O'Hare International Airport (ORD) MOS Issue Taxiway/Object Approval Date 9/30/2005 Separations OFA Centerline Wingtip Standard 160 ft Existing 131 ft Airport Ref Code D-V Critical Aircraft Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Model B747-400 N/A ADG V Wingspan 213' Synopsis The existing separation between Taxiway A and the terminal core service road that is located next to Concourses C, E, F, G, and H is 131 ft, while the required taxiway object OFA is 160 ft.
From page 107...
... MOS Issue Taxiway/Taxiway Approval Date 9/30/2005 Separations OFA Centerline Wingtip Standard 267 ft Existing 251 ft Airport Ref Code D-V Critical Aircraft Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Model B747-400 B747-400 ADG V V Wingspan 196' 196' Synopsis The existing separation between Taxiways A and B is 251 ft, while the required separation is 267 ft. At the time the taxiways were built, 251 ft complied with the FAA design criteria.
From page 108...
... Application of Methodology Risk Plot AA-5 Centerline Sep 251 ft Severity Major Risk Level < 1.0E-09 Conclusion Low Risk Acceptable Case Study # 12 - Barnstable Municipal Airport (HYA) MOS Issue Runway/Taxiway Approval Date 8/17/1998 Separations OFA Centerline Wingtip Standard 400 ft 282 ft Existing 300 ft 219 ft evaluating other alternative solutions to the separation between Taxiways A and B, an MOS was requested to keep the existing separation while following the mentioned Air Traffic Order operation restrictions.
From page 109...
... Cross-section of the runway/taxiway existing separation at HYA. Application of Methodology Risk Plot AA-33 and AA-43 Centerline Sep Severity Catastrophic Risk Level Airborne 1.1E-09 Risk Level Ground 1.0E-07 Annual Vol.
From page 110...
... Due to economic constraints, the feasible solution to the separation noncompliance was to request an MOS. After a detailed analysis of several representative aircraft, it was determined that the existing separation provided adequate clearance for two critical aircraft (B727-200)
From page 111...
... MOS Issue Runway/Taxiway Approval Date 6/12/2009 Separations OFA Centerline Wingtip Standard 500 ft and 550 ft Existing 400 ft Airport Ref Code D-VI Critical Aircraft Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Model B747-800 B747-800 ADG VI VI Wingspan 224' 224' Synopsis Based on AC 150/5300-13, Chapter 2, Table 2-2, the required runway to taxiway separation at SEA is 400 ft for a CAT I approach, 500 ft for CAT II/III approach with a visibility no lower than ½ statute mile, and 550 ft for CAT II/III approach with a visibility less than ½ statute mile. The existing northernmost section of Taxiway B is located 400 ft east of the approach end of Runway 16L and thus complies with the requirement for CAT I approaches, but provides less than the required separation for CAT II/III approaches.
From page 112...
... Operations Expected # Years > 100 years Conclusion High Risk Case Study # 15 - Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA) MOS Issue Taxiway/Taxilane Approval Date 6/2/2009 Separations OFA Centerline Wingtip Standard 324 ft 62 ft Existing 219 ft 44.3 ft Airport Ref Code D-VI
From page 113...
... the average wingtip clearance for an ADG IV taxilane and an ADG VI taxiway required a minimum wingtip separation of 42.3 ft. This distance is less than the available wingtip separation of 44.3 ft between the typical aircraft using Taxiway B (Boeing B747-800)
From page 114...
... MOS Issue Runway/Taxiway Approval Date 3/5/1999 Separations Runway OFA Taxiway OFA Centerline Standard 186 ft 400 ft Existing 169 ft 320 ft Airport Ref Code D-III Critical Aircraft Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Model Grumman Gulfstream IV Grumman Gulfstream IV ADG III III Wingspan 78' 78' Synopsis Based on AC 150/5300-13, Chapter 2, Table 2-2, the required runway to taxiway separation at ASE, classified as an ADG D-III airport, is 400 ft. A relocation of the existing taxiway was proposed to increase the runway/taxiway separation from 221.5 ft to 320 ft.
From page 115...
... Application of Methodology Risk Plot AA-33, AA-34, and AA-43 Centerline Sep 320 ft Severity Catastrophic Risk Level Airborne Cat I – 8.5E-10 Cat II – 9.0E-09 Risk Level Ground 9.0E-08 Annual Vol. Operations 45,000 Expected # Years > 100 years Conclusion Medium Risk Mitigation Recommended
From page 116...
... To avoid abandoning Taxiway F, an MOS to the standard separation between Taxiway E and F was requested. The required parallel taxiway separation for the critical ADG III per AC 150/5300-13, Chapter 2, Table 2-3 was 152 ft.
From page 117...
... Application of Methodology Risk Plot AA-7 Wingtip Sep 44 ft Severity Major Risk Level < 1.0E-09 Conclusion Low Risk Acceptable Case Study # 18 - New Castle Airport (ILG) MOS Issue Taxiway/Object Approval Date 6/29/2000 Separations OFA Centerline Wingtip Standard 259 ft 129.5 ft Existing 206 ft 103 ft Airport Ref Code D-V Critical Aircraft Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Model AC-130 Spectre N/A ADG IV Wingspan 132.5'
From page 118...
... Cross-section of the existing separation at ILG. Application of Methodology Risk Plot AA-11 Centerline Sep 103 ft Severity Major Risk Level 2.8E-08 Conclusion Low Risk Acceptable
From page 119...
... With respect to the runway OFA, AC 150/5300-13, Chapter 3, Table 3-3 requires a width of 800 ft versus the 750 ft existing separation available. However, the hangar structures were outside of the taxiway OFA, the runway safety area (RSA)
From page 120...
... MOS Issue Runway/Taxiway Approval Date 6/26/2002 (subm.) Separations Runway OFA Taxiway OFA Centerline Standard 240 ft Existing 197 ft Airport Ref Code B-II Critical Aircraft Aircraft 1 Aircraft 2 Model Beech King Air C90 Beech King Air C90 ADG II II Wingspan 50' 50'
From page 121...
... Cross-section of the existing separation at TAN. Application of Methodology Risk Plot AA-31 and AA-47 Centerline Sep 197 ft Severity Catastrophic Risk Level Airborne 3.0E-10 Risk Level Ground 8.0E-08 Annual Vol.
From page 122...
... TRB Transportation Research Board TSA Transportation Security Administration U.S.DOT United States Department of Transportation


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.