Guidebook for Measuring Performance of Automated People Mover Systems at Airports (2012) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 8-19
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 8... ...
and offers a summary of this comparison. Lastly, this chapter summarizes the O&M contract's relationship to performance measurement.
|
From page 9... ...
One large airport with a large airside APM recently included provisions and funding for midlife improvements to the Photo: www.bombardier.com Multiple Trains in Maintenance Facility at Hartsfield–Jackson International Airport Photo: Lea+Elliott, Inc. Single Train in Maintenance Facility at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport
|
From page 10... ...
The DBOM method, sometimes referred to as "super turnkey," includes an initial period of O&M services as part of the APM system procurePhoto: Lea+Elliott, Inc. Two-Car Train in Maintenance Facility at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport
|
From page 11... ...
Although having in-house staff provide O&M services for a transit system is not rare in urban settings (including some urban APMs) , it is fairly uncommon for airport APM systems.
|
From page 12... ...
A large international airport with a large airside APM system recently used the analysis described in this chapter to evaluate, and ultimately Photo: Lea+Elliott, Inc. On-Grade Maintenance Facility at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
|
From page 13... ...
The rankings may be considered representative based upon industry experience to date but should not be considered absolute because such experience is limited. When applying the methodology of the case studies to other airport APM systems, the ranking of the measurement factors should be tailored to the legal, contractual, and operational environment of that particular airport APM system.
|
From page 14... ...
3.3.2.1 Continuity Disruption Continuity disruption refers to the risk of disruption attributable to the procurement option that manifests itself in disruption to the operations and maintenance of the APM. Examples of such disruption are a drop in system availability or an increase in downtime events.
|
From page 15... ...
15 provider is a large APM supplier with a large backup labor pool, it is likely not a labor pool versed in the specifics of the APM technology at hand. Availability and Speed of Delivery of Parts and Spares.
|
From page 16... ...
. The service availability of an APM system is discussed in depth in subsequent chapters of this report.
|
From page 17... ...
17 a prospective O&M provider will reside in the host city and be considered a local company. Thus, the goal of enhancing local contractual participation has been historically challenging and is usually met in the same way M/W/BE goals have been met.
|
From page 18... ...
This highlights a possible scenario where a physical expansion or extension to an existing APM system is performed by the original APM supplier while the existing system is being operated and maintained by a third party. This scenario actually occurred at a major international airport and required careful coordination between the two entities.
|
From page 19... ...
The actual O&M contract also establishes precisely how that performance is measured. The following chapters elaborate on performance measurements for APM systems at airports and offer specific contractual approaches for such measurement.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.