Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 27-33

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 27...
... , and also to select domestic and 1 General Practice international researchers and software developers identified 2 Criteria and Programs Used in Site Response Analysis by PIs. 3 Dimensions, Analysis, and Model Type 4 Seismic Hazard Motion Input Required for Site Response It should be noted that the list of participants was not Analysis developed with any explicit consideration of strict statisti- 5 Soil Profile Input Required for Site Response Analysis cal concepts.
From page 28...
... site response analyses in-house and researchers that were contacted primarily to obtain relevant information about the programs and/or models they developed. This study does not further identify the respondents to preserve the prom- SURVEY RESPONSES ised anonymity.
From page 29...
... empirically derived site factors and (2) computer strong levels of shaking where their inherent assumptions software for site response analysis.
From page 30...
... Selection of spectrally compatible ground motion time histories is the next important step in developing input for A number of respondents said that they performed laborasite response analysis. Many of the respondents selected nat- tory tests on soil samples to develop dynamic soil properties; ural time histories; significantly fewer used synthetic ground however, more respondents indicated that they used modulus motions.
From page 31...
... Nonlinear Total Stress Analysis SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS The survey responses reflect a broad range of opinions as to when a nonlinear (NL) site response analysis is needed.
From page 32...
... For the simplified method of soil liquefaction assessment, most respondents reported that they use surface PGA from The survey listed a series of input parameters to typical equivalent-linear analysis. Few respondents, though, indisite response analyses and asked which were considered most cated that they use computed surface PGA from nonlinear important.
From page 33...
... 23 response, (2) SFSI analysis, (3)


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.