Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

8 Reducing Racial/Ethnic Disparities
Pages 211-240

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 211...
... . A number of assessments over the ensuing decade continued to document this overrepresentation of minority youth, especially African Americans, in the juvenile justice system (Engen, Steen, and Bridges, 2002; Bishop, 2005; Lauritsen, 2005; Bishop and Leiber, 2012)
From page 212...
... core requirement was broadened from "confinement" to "contact," and states were required to implement strategies aimed at reducing disproportionality (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2009a)
From page 213...
... . Instead of presenting another detailed review, this chapter briefly summarizes the problem, reviews the two main frameworks that have been used to understand and explain the problem (differential offending and differential selection)
From page 214...
... .3 MINORITY YOUTH INVOLVEMENT IN THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM Researchers typically draw on three possible sources of data to gauge the extent of minority4 youth involvement in crime and delinquency: official 2  The term "disproportionate minority contact" is used to describe the disproportionate number of minority youth at various stages of processing in the juvenile justice system (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2009a, 2009b)
From page 215...
... In addition, the degree of black overrepresentation is at its lowest in the category of drug abuse violations, in which blacks make up roughly 26 percent of youth arrests. These data consistently show that there are important differences by race in rates of arrest -- especially across offense type, with black youth arrested for violent index crimes at much higher rates than whites (Bishop, 2005; Bales and Piquero, 2012)
From page 216...
... 1,343 (1.2) 109,507 Drug abuse violations 97,232 (72.4)
From page 217...
... For example, RRI data suggest that H ­ ispanic youth experience greater contact with the juvenile justice system than do white youth and that the extent of these differences (disparities) is not as great as those experienced in general by black youth (Feyerherm, 2011, p.
From page 218...
... TABLE 8-2 The Processing of Juveniles by Race, 2008 218 American Indian or Asian or White Black Alaskan Native Pacific Islander Total Population Ages 10-17 25,251,300 (77.4)
From page 219...
... 96) reports that black youth are disproportionately involved in such offenses as measured via official records, whereas self-report data indicate that white youth report higher levels of drug abuse violations.
From page 220...
... used data from the three delinquency studies in Pittsburgh, P ­ ennsylvania; Rochester, New York; and Seattle, Washington, to examine DMC and the factors that might affect it at the police contact and court referral levels. First, in all three cities, African American youth had the highest rate of contact/referral, and it was significantly greater than for white youth.
From page 221...
... Third, although black youth are most likely to be disadvantaged, this is not uniformly the case and similar patterns tend to emerge for Hispanic youth as well. Their review covered studies conducted in 2002-2010 on the official processing of minority youth at nine different decision points in the juvenile justice system (arrest, court referral, delinquency findings, detention, diversion, petition/charge filings, probation, secure confinement, and transfer to adult court)
From page 222...
... Both American Indian and Asian American youth have a higher rate of disproportionate contact at the case referral stage and the detention stage than whites. Asian youth have higher rates of processing than black youth in the referral, petition, and adjudication stages as well higher rates of transfer to adult court.
From page 223...
... Some scholars emphasize differential offending as the root source of disproportionate minority involvement in the juvenile justice system and of the system's differential response. This approach points, in effect, to real, underlying differences between white and minority youth in the actual extent of engaging in (or the severity of)
From page 224...
... . A similar study has not been done on minority youth in the United States, but, given the high rates of heavy alcohol consumption among African Americans and Native Americans (Galvan and Caetano, 2003)
From page 225...
... . Thus, the differential selection hypothesis would anticipate that minority youth emerge in official records at a disproportionate rate because of differential police, court, and correctional decisions.
From page 226...
... are largely race based. Thus, because the passage of the crack cocaine sentencing laws were made, in part, as a response to the violence that was permeating many inner cities in the mid- to late 1980s, and because the police had to selectively target certain communities and drug markets, an obvious by-product was that minority youth would be exceedingly more likely to fall under formal social control.
From page 227...
... .14 Race, police contact, and minority youth's behavior are also intertwined in complicated ways. When contacts with police occur early, the likelihood that a black youth will have future contacts with police is increased.
From page 228...
... .15 In the earlier cited review, Cohen and colleagues (2011) concluded that some race effects exist in the processing of some minority youth, in some locations, at some time periods, and for certain offenses; that minority youth are more likely to receive harsh treatment for certain but not all offenses; and that racial disparities can be documented for certain stages but not others.
From page 229...
... Some evidence suggests that urban courts tend to be more formal and bureaucratic and have greater access to detention facilities than rural courts and that these characteristics are associated with harsher sentences. Because they disproportionately reside in urban counties, black youth are at increased risk of being processed, detained, and punished than white youth in rural localities who have committed similar offenses.
From page 230...
... Code of the Street Anderson's (1999) code-of-the-street thesis, which contends that minority youth -- especially black youth -- form and espouse an attitude that is organized around informal rules governing street behavior and response to personal affronts.
From page 231...
... child population. African American youth in the child welfare system are up to two times more likely than white adolescents to experience at least one arrest (Ryan and Testa, 2005)
From page 232...
... . Negative stereotypes and media imagery of minority youth may play a role in the differential treatment they receive from police and other actors in the juvenile justice system.
From page 233...
... examined such community attributes as underclass poverty, racial inequality, wealth, court referral rates, mobility, urbanism, youth density, and criminal justice resources on court processes. Sampson and Wilson (1995)
From page 234...
... To be sure, there has been much attention devoted to racial/ethnic disparities over the past decades, yet the empirical research has primarily focused on assessing the effect of differential offending and differential enforcement (and to a lesser extent differential processing) in an isolated manner.
From page 235...
... Funded by the Annie E Casey Foundation, the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative was designed to reduce reliance on secure detention by promoting changes to policies, practices, and programs.
From page 236...
... reports that the DMC Action Network in Peoria, Illinois, found that many arrests of black youth were for aggravated battery and that once alternative conflict strategies were started, arrests for black youth dropped significantly. Working with the Child Welfare and School Systems As noted, the child welfare and school systems are contributors to the overrepresentation of minority youth in the juvenile justice system.
From page 237...
... Publicly available data representing 85 percent of the nation's students are being used to determine disparate discipline rates for suspensions and expulsions as well as arrests and referral to law enforcement.16 A recent rollout of the expanded Department of Education civil rights database and the Texas study showing the high degree of discretion being exercised by school administrators in suspension and expulsion decisions (Fabelo et al., 2011) have resulted in widespread media coverage and a collaborative project between the Justice and Education departments to address the "school to prison pipeline." Among the goals of the initiative are to promote collaborative research and data endeavors, including evaluations of alternative disciplinary policies and interventions and to encourage positive discipline options and awareness of evidencebased and promising policies and practices among each state's judicial and education leadership (U.S.
From page 238...
... . Based on experiences in reducing disparities in the child welfare system and for crossover youth who enter the juvenile justice system, five general strategies have been identified (Chapin Hall Center for Children, 2009)
From page 239...
... Many other factors affect disproportionality of minority youth in the juvenile justice system, including the troubling entrenched patterns of poverty, segregation, gaps in educational achievement, and residential instability. DMC exists in the broader context of a "racialized society" in which many public policies, institutional practices, and cultural representations operate to produce and maintain racial inequities.
From page 240...
... Similarly, policies and practices involving youth who have ties to the mental health and child welfare systems need to be carefully assessed to ensure that the reasons for their handling are legitimate and their subsequent processing by the juvenile justice system is appropriate and nondiscriminatory. Third, any reform strategy should focus on eliminating formal and informal agency policies and practices that are shown to disproportionately disadvantage minority youth.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.