Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

1 Introduction
Pages 6-16

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 6...
... For many years, Congress enacted and the land management agencies implemented various discrete programs addressing individual uses of the federal lands. Early attention was paid to the commodity or economic 6
From page 7...
... 7 be" 1 ci>:~-~- ~ \\ -t t , 1 ,.\ - - - ~ .
From page 9...
... . MlSSISSlppl Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York Nonh Carolina Nonh Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee 1 exas Utah Vennant Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming 3.3 87.1 43.1 9.9 46.4 36.2 0.4 2.4 28.0 12.4 5.4 16.4 63.7 1.4 1.9 0.4 1.1 5.5 4.0 0.8 3.1 1.6 10.0 6.8 5.5 4.7 30.5 1.5 85.1 12.8 3.3 31.3 5.1 7.0 4.4 1.2 1.9 48.7 2.2 0.7 6.0 5.6 7.0 1.9 63.6 5.4 9.7 29.2 7.6 5.2 49.5 ,, SOURCE: Bureau of Land Management (1989a)
From page 10...
... . MlSSISSlppl Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina Nonh Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming 3.3 87.1 43.1 9.9 46.4 36.2 0.4 2.4 28.0 12.4 5.4 16.4 63.7 1.4 1.9 0.4 1.1 5.5 4.0 0.8 3.1 1.6 10.0 6.8 5.5 4.7 30.5 1.5 85.1 12.8 3.3 31.3 5.1 7.0 4.4 1.2 1.9 48.7 2.2 0.7 6.0 5.6 7.0 1.9 63.6 5.4 9.7 29.2 7.6 5.2 49.5 .
From page 11...
... Originally through their own initiative, and now in response to statutory mandates, the BLM and the Forest Service prepare land use plans for the lands they manage. Under the multiple-use management requirements of the FLPMA and the NF~fA, these plans address the full panoply of federal land uses, including both economic uses (e.g., mineral development, timber production, livestock grazing, and ski resorts and other recreational facilities)
From page 12...
... Unlike most surface uses and even some mineral development such as coal mining, the volume and quality of the oil or gas resource are seldom known at the time land use planning is conducted, making projections of exploration and development activity levels and environmental impacts more difficult and less reliable. Even if all the land that might be identified for leasing in the planning process is leased during the plan s life, to attempt to identify during planning.
From page 13...
... The planning and ana~s'is are conducted at the resource disposal (leasing, sale,.or rental) stage (e.g., :regional coal lease sales, environmental impact statements, timber sale plans,.
From page 14...
... Stated more simply, the questions concern when and how the two land management agencies should be required to say yes or lose the right to say no to oil and gas exploration and development based on environmental concerns. This report provides recommendations for how oil and gas exploration and development should be further integrated with the federal land use planning process and where in the subsequent leasing and management process further environmentally related analysis and decisions should be made.
From page 15...
... Particular areas where conflicts between oil and gas exploration and development are most intense, and the reasons those areas are the source of such conflict, are the subject of Chapter 7. The final chapter, Chapter 8, presents the committee's conclusions and recommendations for "changes in agency procedures and regulations, and statutory requirements, for both the planning process and the oil and gas leasing and management process.
From page 16...
... 1981. Federal Lands Subject to Restnctions of Mineral Development.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.