Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

IDR Team Summary 6: Are there fundamental principles underlying the transition from one to two individuals? Are these scalable to larger social groups?
Pages 65-72

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 65...
... If we want to understand the fundamental principles and mechanisms underlying collective action, an excellent place to start is with groups of just two, for several reasons.
From page 66...
... (5) Groups of two can be fraternal, made up of genetically related individuals, or egalitarian, made up of genetically unrelated individuals, allowing a comprehensive understanding of the possible factors facilitating social behavior.
From page 67...
... McGraw, North Carolina State University Anand D Sarwate, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey James Urton, University of California, Santa Cruz IDR TEAM SUMMARY -- GROUP 6 James Urton, NAKFI Science Writing Scholar University of California, Santa Cruz IDR Team 6 was asked to probe the fundamental principles of the simplest group, that of two individuals.
From page 68...
... There are only two members to form pairwise interactions and respond to the external environment. If common principles underlie the formation of the group of two, then the dyad forms the foundation of all group structures and could be a common framework to understand both group behavior and history.
From page 69...
... In Protestant Christianity, some denominations fragmented and later merged again in response to internal and external factors. Sexual reproduction is also a type of merger in which egg and sperm unite to form a single zygote, a new and novel individual.
From page 70...
... The dyad can also include unique evolutionary processes in which both members are changed irrevocably by selection pressures. In a "red queen" evolutionary arms race between a pathogen and a host, strong selection can ensure that both members of the group change dramatically through mutation accumulation as each tries to outmaneuver the offensive and defensive strategies of the other.
From page 71...
... In vitro viral capsid and cytoskeletal assembly assays can measure assembly and disassembly of complex biochemical groups from their building blocks. Repeated and robust experiments with these new tools should reveal the fundamental building blocks of more complex groups at a variety of scales, potentially boosting the importance of the dyad in group formation and maintenance.
From page 72...
... 72 COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR: FROM CELLS TO SOCIETIES to advancing group studies beyond abstract models and theories. The collective behavior field will soon be in a position to collect data that could address many of the IDR team's outstanding questions and concerns.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.