Skip to main content

Assessing and Improving the Interpretation of Breast Images Workshop Summary (2015) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Appendix: Statement of Task andWorkshop Agenda
Pages 69-74

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 69...
... Participants will be invited to discuss topics related to • the relationship between reader volume and interpretive performance; • the relationship between screening and diagnostic volume, and the impact of working up one's own recalled cases on interpretative performance; • performance criteria to identify radiologists who might benefit most from interventions; • use of test instruments to assess interpretive performance; and • tools and interventions to improve interpretive performance. The committee will develop the agenda for the workshop sessions, select and invite speakers and discussants, and moderate the discussions.
Read the entire page →
From page 70...
... 70 ASSESSING AND IMPROVING THE INTERPRETATION OF BREAST IMAGES discussions at the workshop will be prepared by a designated rapporteur in accordance with institutional guidelines. WORKSHOP AGENDA May 12, 2015 7:45 am Registration 8:00 am Welcome from the National Cancer Policy Forum and the American Cancer Society  Patricia Ganz, University of California, Los Angeles, Vice Chair, National Cancer Policy Forum Robert Smith, American Cancer Society Overview and Goals of the Workshop Diana Buist, Group Health Research Institute Planning Committee Chair Overview of the 2005 IOM Consensus Report Improving Breast Imaging Quality Standards Etta Pisano, Medical University of South Carolina 8:45 am Session 1: Challenges in the Delivery of High-Quality Mammography Moderator: Barbara Monsees, Washington University School of Medicine Overview of Current Challenges Barbara Monsees, Washington University School of Medicine Geographic Access, Equity, and Impact on Quality Tracy Onega, Dartmouth Medical School Audits and the National Mammography Database Carl D'Orsi, Emory Healthcare Group Discussion
Read the entire page →
From page 71...
... APPENDIX 71 10:30 am Break 10:45 am Session 2: Training/Experience and Interpretive Performance Moderator: Diana Buist, Group Health Research Institute U.S. and International Variation in Volume and Performance Measures Diana Buist, Group Health Research Institute Interpretive Volume and Accuracy in Canada Isabelle Théberge, National Public Health Institute, Quebec The Role of Specialist Radiology Technologists Louise Henderson, University of North Carolina School of Medicine Residency Requirements and Board Certification and Maintenance Debra Monticciolo, Texas A&M College of Medicine Group Discussion 12:30 pm Lunch Break 1:15 pm Session 3: Identifying Radiologists and Facilities That Would Benefit from Intervention Moderator: Diana Miglioretti, University of California, Davis Diagnostic and Screening Aspects Patricia Carney, Oregon Health & Science University and the Knight Cancer Institute Joint Criteria and Confidence Interval-Based Approaches Diana Miglioretti, University of California, Davis
Read the entire page →
From page 72...
... 72 ASSESSING AND IMPROVING THE INTERPRETATION OF BREAST IMAGES Identifying Facilities Through CMS Data Rebecca Hubbard, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Group Discussion 3:00 pm Break 3:15 pm Session 4: Test Instruments to Assess Interpretive Performance: Challenges and Opportunities Moderator: Lora Barke, Radiology Imaging Associates Overview of Test Set Design and Use Robert Smith, American Cancer Society Overview of International Test Sets Mireille Broeders, Dutch Reference Center for Screening Panel Discussion: Session speakers and Matthew Wallis, Cambridge and Huntington Breast Screening Service Group Discussion 4:30 pm Wrap-Up Day 1 and Adjourn May 13, 2015 8:00 am Registration 8:30 am Session 5: Tools and Interventions to Improve Interpretive Performance Moderator: Patricia Carney, Oregon Health & Science University Cancer Institute Educational Interventions to Improve Screening Berta Geller, University of Vermont
Read the entire page →
From page 73...
... APPENDIX 73 Thresholds for Performance Matthew Wallis, Cambridge and Huntington Breast Screening Service Panel Discussion: Session speakers and Mireille Broeders, Dutch Reference Center for Screening Carl D'Orsi, Emory Healthcare Group Discussion 10:00 am Break 10:15 am Session 6: Reactor Panel: Potential Solutions to Current Challenges Moderator: Susan Dentzer, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Panelists: Lora Barke, Radiology Imaging Associates Helen Barr, Food and Drug Administration Bryan Loy, Humana Barbara Monsees, Washington University School of Medicine Dana Smetherman, Ochsner Health System Robert Smith, American Cancer Society Kelly Walborn, Patient Advocate Group Discussion 11:45 am Workshop Wrap-Up Diana Buist, Group Health Research Institute 12:00 pm Adjourn
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • test instruments
  • assess interpretive
  • individually authored
  • improve interpretive
  • workshop summary

  • topics related
  • reader volume
  • discuss topics
  • authored workshop
  • interpretative performance

  • identify radiologists
  • workshop sessions
  • performance criteria
  • own recalled
  • diagnostic volume

  • invite speakers


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.