Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 38-65

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 38...
... 39 APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire (Web-Only)
From page 39...
... 40 NCHRP Synthesis 46-04: The Impact of Geotechnical Investigation Scope on Construction Claims, Change Orders, and Overruns Dear: The Transportation Research Board (TRB) is preparing a synthesis on the impact of geotechnical investigation scope on construction claims, change orders, and overruns.
From page 40...
... 41 Please complete and submit the survey by February 11. We estimate that Parts One and Two of the survey will each take approximately 20 minutes to complete.
From page 41...
... 42 Thank you very much for your time and expertise! Please enter the date (MM/DD/YYYY)
From page 42...
... 43 1. Please select the response that best describes your agency's experience with site characterization: 2.
From page 43...
... 44 Please select the item below that best describes the minimum requirements: You indicated your agency implements unique subsurface investigation practices that materially differ from those described within AASHTO subsurface investigation guidelines and testing standards. Please briefly describe the unique agency practice(s)
From page 44...
... 45 4. If minimum subsurface investigation requirements are formally specified, is it common for the actual scope of subsurface investigations to exceed the minimum requirements for specific projects?
From page 45...
... 46 Please upload the document(s) using the buttons below.
From page 46...
... 47 Please describe the geotechnical information required to be included with bridge project bid documents. Part One, cont'd 7.
From page 47...
... 48 8. Does your agency maintain a database of subsurface information?
From page 48...
... 49 Please select the statement below that best describes the perceived impact of the specific changes in terms of the number of claims, change orders, and overruns.
From page 49...
... 50 Please briefly describe the provisions in the text box below. If possible, please provide a link or an attachment to the specific provisions.
From page 50...
... 51 When was this practice implemented? Please select the statement below that best describes the perceived success of the practice in reducing the number of claims, change orders, and overruns?
From page 51...
... 52 11. Has your agency experienced significant performance problems that can be attributed to subsurface conditions or site characterization practices?
From page 52...
... 53 Please briefly list the projects and provide an estimate of the magnitude of the cost savings that were achieved. Part Two Questions 13 through 16 relate to claims, change orders, and cost overruns from all sources/causes.
From page 53...
... 54 14. If claims, change orders, and cost overruns are a recognized problem within your agency, what is the primary source of concern regarding the claims, change orders, and cost overruns?
From page 54...
... 55 Please explain the perceived effect. Part Two, cont'd Questions 17 through 21 relate to claims, change orders, and cost overruns that can be attributed to subsurface conditions or site characterization practices.
From page 55...
... 56 What is the basis for preventing such claims?
From page 56...
... 57 20. Has the magnitude and/or frequency of claims, change orders, and overruns that can be attributed to subsurface conditions or site characterization practices changed over the past 10 years?
From page 57...
... 58 Optional Part Three Page exit logic: Page Logic IF: Question "Are records of claims, change orders, and/or cost overruns for your agency readily available? " #22 is one of the following answers ("No, and I'm ready to submit my responses from previous pages.")
From page 58...
... 59 Questions 23 through 32 relate to quantifying the total number and total costs of claims, change orders and cost overruns experienced by your agency since 2009. Responses to these questions should reflect all claims, not just those related to subsurface investigations.
From page 59...
... 60 26. What is the cumulative total contract cost for all projects associated with all claims since 2009?
From page 60...
... 61 32. What is the cumulative total contract cost for all projects that have had cost overruns since 2009?
From page 61...
... 62 33. Does your agency keep data related to or that could otherwise be used to identify claims, change orders, and cost overruns that resulted from subsurface conditions or site characterization practices?
From page 62...
... 63 34. How many of the claims experienced by your agency had causes that can be attributed to subsurface conditions or site characterization practices?
From page 63...
... 64 40. How many of the projects with cost overruns had causes that can be attributed to subsurface conditions or site characterization practices?
From page 64...
... 65 43. Is the type of information requested below readily available?
From page 65...
... 66 Types of information of interest for individual projects with claims related to subsurface conditions or site characterization practices dating back to 2009: Type of project (bridge, roadway, other) Project bid cost Final project cost Project contract arrangement (design-bid-build, design-build, public private partnership, construction manager/general contractor, other)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.