Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 701-731

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 702...
... A-2 APPENDIX A GEOFOAM USAGE SURVEY: QUESTIONNAIRE Contents A.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................
From page 703...
... A-3 the questionnaire that was distributed. As a result, it is not possible to state exactly how many copies were actually distributed.
From page 704...
... A-4 Council through its Transportation Research Board has recently funded a research team (John S Horvath, Ph.D., P.E.
From page 705...
... A-5 Date: Agency or Company: Name of Person Preparing Questionnaire: Title of Person Preparing Questionnaire: Postal Mail Address: City: State: Zip Code: Telephone Number: Telefax Number: E-mail address: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - Please return the completed questionnaire no later than November 30, 1999 to Mr. David Arellano, P.E., Graduate Research Assistant: • by postal mail: David Arellano University of Illinois Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory 205 North Mathews Avenue Urbana, IL 61801-2352 • by telefax: (217)
From page 706...
... A-6 • by telephone: (217) 333-6940 Part A The purpose of this part is to help us identify extreme opinions, i.e.
From page 707...
... A-7 A3bii: To help us understand what aspect(s) of EPS-block geofoam most need improvement, what is the primary negative aspect or issue that you can state about this material in road applications?
From page 708...
... A-8 a design alternative involving EPS-block geofoam in road construction? This will help us identify those items that need to be closely evaluated for the purpose of optimization or possibly even elimination in design in order to minimize overall project cost.
From page 709...
... A-9 Question B5: If you ever used EPS-block geofoam from a supplier, or if you are a supplier, who offers third-party certification for the manufactured quality of EPS block: B5i: Do you rely solely on this or do you still do supplemental random sampling and testing of the EPS after it is delivered to the job site? B5ii: Have you ever had a problem (such as, but not limited to, material not conforming)
From page 710...
... A-10 Question B7: Do you have any of the following supporting documentation that you think may be helpful to us in achieving the research objectives and that you would be willing to provide (we will contact you for follow up)
From page 711...
... A-11 Question A1: Which category best describes the agency or company you represent: design engineer [ ] EPS molder [ ]
From page 712...
... A-12 2. Although Delaware does have soft soil conditions in certain areas, the potential problems associated with these soils are mitigated by more conventional methods such as prefabricated vertical drains, surcharging, etc.
From page 713...
... A-13 13. We have placed geofoam on the pre-approved materials list for a lightweight fill.
From page 714...
... A-14 with using EPS-blocks. More conventional treatment methods such as surcharging with prefabricated vertical drains and use of a bridge structure are preferred by some agencies over EPS-block geofoam.
From page 715...
... A-15 8. Reduction in load applied to weak subgrade soils (lightweight fill)
From page 716...
... A-16 5. No other problem but cost.
From page 717...
... A-17 design against differential icing (Chapter 4) , lack of information about facing requirements if a vertical embankment is used, density uniformity on blocks obtained at the site (Chapter 9)
From page 718...
... A-18 12. Same response as A3Bii second and third items.
From page 719...
... A-19 concrete slab if a concrete cap is used (Chapter 6)
From page 720...
... A-20 13. Special site preparation, especially in areas with a high water table.
From page 721...
... A-21 8. Don't know.
From page 723...
... A-23 1. The construction contract that included the specification was recently awarded and construction activity has not taken place.
From page 724...
... A-24 between the relationship of density and compressive strength and the long term creep performance of EPS. These two concerns are addressed in Chapter 2 and 9.
From page 725...
... A-25 9. No third party was involved.
From page 726...
... A-26 12. Yes, density of blocks varied considerably in one particular tractor trailer load with some blocks not meeting density criterion.
From page 727...
... A-27 9. Amount of cover for the different geofoam densities.
From page 728...
... A-28 Ten respondents indicate that they have construction plans, specifications, design reports, cost information, field instrumentation data, or photographs.
From page 729...
... TABLE A.1 PROJ 24-11.doc AR MI CO MN CT MT DE NE GA NV HI NY IA OH ID OR IL SC IN UT KS WA KY WI LA WY A-29
From page 730...
... TABLE A.2 PROJ 24-11.doc STATE YEAR QUANTITY m3 (yd3) Bid Price in U.S.
From page 731...
... TABLE A.3 PROJ 24-11.doc Agency or Company Plans Specifications Design Reports Cost Estimates and Comparisons Field Instrumentation /Performance Data Photographs CTDOT X MIDOT X X MOLDER X X X WADOT X X X X X WYDOT X X X X X KSDOT X X INDOT X X X X X ILDOT X X X X X UTDOT X X X X X X NYDOT X X X X X A-31

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.