Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 5-24

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 5...
... 5 C H A P T E R 2 2.1 AASHTO Median Design Guidelines The AASHTO Roadside Design Guide (2) and the AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (commonly referred to as the Green Book)
From page 6...
... 6greater than 9 m (30 ft) but less than 15 m (50 ft)
From page 7...
... 7 Figure 2-2. Guidelines for median barriers on high-speed, fully controlled-access roadways from 2006 AASHTO Roadside Design Guide (2)
From page 8...
... 8A roadside barrier may be required either to prevent errant vehicles from colliding with a fixed object in the median or to prevent vehicles from overturning when traversing the slope. Placement locations "b" and "d" in Figure 2-3 are at the edge of the inside (or median)
From page 9...
... 9 2.2.1 Encroachment Studies Early median safety studies sought to determine and quantify factors that caused vehicle encroachments into the median area on divided highways. In the early 1960s, Hutchinson and Kennedy (4)
From page 10...
... 10 enter the median area because another vehicle unexpectedly merges into the occupied lane. Hutchinson and Kennedy also examined the relationship between ADT and the percent of vehicles that crossed into the median.
From page 11...
... 11 were the primary focus in the study were median width and median cross section. For the routes studied, variables such as pavement width and shoulder width remained constant.
From page 12...
... 12 Relationships were developed between the type of collision and the relative effects of the median width. The type of accident most affected by the increase in median width was headon collisions.
From page 13...
... 13 of the variation in CMC frequency. Interpretation of the ADT parameter (1.77)
From page 14...
... 14 median barrier crashes. The outlined region also contains B/C ratios that exceed 1.0.
From page 15...
... 15 Variable NB RENB NM Constant –1.551 (0.181)
From page 16...
... 16 the economic analysis. The severity distributions for each of the four crash types are shown in Table 2-5.
From page 17...
... 17 produced B/C ratios greater than 10.0. As such, divided highways in Zone No.
From page 18...
... 18 Miaou et al.
From page 19...
... 19 state's median design policy so that no more freeways could be built with median widths less than 21 m (70 ft)
From page 20...
... 20 • The Florida Highway Patrol should have a line item on their accident report forms that clearly indicates a crossmedian crash. • The benefit of using shoulder rumble strips along shoulders adjacent to median barrier walls should be evaluated.
From page 21...
... 21 frequency and severity. During the data collection period, it was estimated that between 300 and 750 cross-median collisions occurred on Florida highways.
From page 22...
... 22 improvement projects.
From page 23...
... 23 2.4.1 Cable Barrier In December 1996, the Oregon Department of Transportation installed two sections of cable barrier along I-5 between Salem and Portland to reduce cross-median collisions. Sposito and Johnston (26)
From page 24...
... 24 words, this states that the severity index of a crash decreased after cable barrier was installed in the median. Davis and Pei (29)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.