Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 13-28

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 13...
... 13 S E C T I O N 4 4.1 Summary of Key Findings There are two key aspects of the land use effect: 1. The effect of existing transit systems and 2.
From page 14...
... 14 Quantifying Transit's Impact on GHG Emissions and Energy Use -- The Land Use Component • Effect of transit trips replacing automobile trips. By transporting people on buses and trains that would otherwise travel by automobile, transit systems also produce a complementary ridership effect.
From page 15...
... The Land Use Effect of Transit: Findings 15 • Improving employment accessibility by clustering new jobs around transit nodes or improving the bus and rail network in individual neighborhoods can also have potent land use effects (described in more detail in Section 4.4.2)
From page 16...
... 16 Quantifying Transit's Impact on GHG Emissions and Energy Use -- The Land Use Component understate the magnitude of the land use effect. Still, using gross density to analyze the land use effect provides a solid link between transit systems and travel patterns.
From page 17...
... The Land Use Effect of Transit: Findings 17 Therefore, a combined 10% increase in VMT without transit (combined ridership and land use benefits) indicates the broad influence of transit systems on travel patterns.
From page 18...
... 18 Quantifying Transit's Impact on GHG Emissions and Energy Use -- The Land Use Component relatively small urban area. The latter tend to be college towns where a high proportion of the population is made up of students, many of whom use transit regularly and do not own a car.
From page 19...
... The Land Use Effect of Transit: Findings 19 4.4.1 Regional Level At the regional level, land use effects of transit system improvements are measured using elasticity values derived from the urbanized area models. Increasing transit route densities by 1% in a region is associated with an increase in population density of 0.2%.
From page 20...
... 20 Quantifying Transit's Impact on GHG Emissions and Energy Use -- The Land Use Component According to Metro's most recent Long-Range Transportation Plan, an additional 430 new directional route miles of high-quality transit (including rail and bus rapid transit) are due to be added to the transit system by 2040.
From page 21...
... The Land Use Effect of Transit: Findings 21 The CTOD TOD Database (TOD for "transit-oriented development) provides several data indicators of the success of this TOD-based turnaround in terms of reversing Evanston's overall population decline and concentrating growth around its high-capacity transit lines.
From page 22...
... 22 Quantifying Transit's Impact on GHG Emissions and Energy Use -- The Land Use Component Areas within a half mile of the four stations increased their activity density by an average 9% over approximately 10 years.10 (When compared to the base trend of population and employment growth in the Chicago region, the station areas saw a net 7% increase in activity density.) This change in density is expected to lead to a 2% reduction in VMT, transportation fuel use, and transportation GHG emissions by households living in the area.
From page 23...
... The Land Use Effect of Transit: Findings 23 • Clustering future job growth in other parts of the region near high-quality transit nodes. A longer term option, improving the region-wide proximity of jobs to high-quality transit, makes living near transit a more desirable option throughout the transit network.
From page 24...
... 24 Quantifying Transit's Impact on GHG Emissions and Energy Use -- The Land Use Component 4.6 Factors that May Influence the Land Use Effect More than just transit investments influence land use development patterns, even in areas immediately adjacent to transit. Public support and market forces play an important role in determining land use patterns.
From page 25...
... The Land Use Effect of Transit: Findings 25 The findings of the ITDP study are consistent with other studies in the field that have used more rigorous statistical methods. An extensive analysis of the San Francisco area's BART heavyrail transit system and its effects on development patterns (Cervero et al.
From page 26...
... 26 Quantifying Transit's Impact on GHG Emissions and Energy Use -- The Land Use Component expect twice the land use effect from a rail transit system as from a bus transit system. And in fact, the land use effect of existing systems with rail is nearly twice that of existing systems without rail, as shown in Table 4.
From page 27...
... The Land Use Effect of Transit: Findings 27 Source: Nelson/Nygaard.
From page 28...
... 28 Quantifying Transit's Impact on GHG Emissions and Energy Use -- The Land Use Component Applying the models developed for this research, the research team estimates that a 1% increase in freeway lane miles per capita in an urban area is associated with a 0.1% decrease in population density. A 1% increase in non-freeway lane miles per capita is associated with a 0.5% decrease in population density in the region.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.