Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 41-75

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 41...
... 41 In te g ra te d D e liv e ry o f S H R P 2 R e n e w a l R e s e a rc h P ro je c ts -- F in a l R e p o rt J u n e 2 0 1 4 CHAPTER 3 Integration of Renewal Projects Overview of Approach The in-depth reviews of the renewal projects provided valuable insight into different ways in which the projects and products could be logically grouped for implementation at the functional/technical level and/or administrative/program level. Nearly all of the aspects/features of the renewal projects identified as a basis for grouping the products were included in the expanded summaries document, and that information was used to develop a preliminary integration/packaging matrix and a corresponding framework/process for the integration tool.
From page 42...
... 42 In te g ra te d D e liv e ry o f S H R P 2 R e n e w a l R e s e a rc h P ro je c ts -- F in a l R e p o rt J u n e 2 0 1 4 Tables 3.1 and 3.2 show example cut-outs of the preliminary matrix that was developed for functional/technical-level application. Table 3.1 shows the renewal projects that would be pertinent to pavement assets covering users throughout the entire highway life cycle, while Table 3.2 shows the renewal projects that would be pertinent to the final design phase covering all five asset item areas.
From page 43...
... 43 In te g ra te d D e liv e ry o f S H R P 2 R e n e w a l R e s e a rc h P ro je c ts -- F in a l R e p o rt J u n e 2 0 1 4 Teleconferencing with AASHTO Subcommittee Members The teleconference interviews were scheduled and conducted between December 21, 2012 and January 7, 2013. The primary objectives of the interviews were to (a)
From page 44...
... Table 3.1. Example Cut-out of Preliminary Integration/Packaging Matrix: Renewal Projects Pertinent to the Pavements Asset Type.
From page 45...
... 45 Table 3.2. Example Cut-out of Preliminary Integration/packaging Matrix: Renewal Projects Pertinent to the Final Design Phase in the Highway Life Cycle Asset Item Product Benefit/Highway Needs Staged Adoption/Use (Project-Level)
From page 46...
... 46 Utilities & ROW Improved Asset Mgt & Plann/Program Improved Hwy Operational Efficiency/LOS 1C 1C Increased Safety 3 1 1 1 3 Accelerated Proj Development & Const Schedule 3, 15B 1, 1A, 15B 1, 1A, 1B, 1C, 15B 1, 1A, 1B, 1C, 15B 1B 1B 3, 15B Improved Project/Asset Performance 3 3 Reduced Project/Asset LifeCycle Cost 3, 15, 15B 15, 15B 15, 15B 15, 15B 3, 15, 15B Increased Highway Sustainability Roadside & Traffic Features Improved Asset Mgt & Plann/Program Improved Hwy Operational Efficiency/LOS Increased Safety 3 3 Accelerated Proj Development & Const Schedule 3 3 Improved Project/Asset Performance 3 3 Reduced Project/Asset LifeCycle Cost 3 3 Increased Highway Sustainability Railroads Improved Asset Mgt & Plann/Program Improved Hwy Operational Efficiency/LOS Increased Safety 3 3 Accelerated Proj Development & Const Schedule 3, 16, 16A 16, 16A 16, 16A 16, 16A 16, 16A 3, 16, 16A Improved Project/Asset Performance 3 3 Reduced Project/Asset LifeCycle Cost 3 3 Increased Highway Sustainability Note: Numbers listed in the table cells are the Renewal project numbers (e.g., 9 equals project R09)
From page 47...
... 47 Figure 3.2. Example illustration of the preliminary integration framework/process.
From page 48...
... 48  Agencies like the idea of coordinated implementations, such as pooled-fund studies, lead states, peer exchanges, and scanning tours.  Subject matter area/technical area should be included as an evaluation portal in the proposed R31 tool.
From page 49...
... 49 priorities among offices, organizational constraints) , contractor and other stakeholder issues, lack of champions, and lack of clarity as to the latest standards.
From page 50...
... 50 Revision of Integration/Packaging Matrix and Tool Framework/ Process Identification of Problems/Constraints and Corresponding Needs The SHRP 2 Renewal products have the potential to address many different needs within a highway agency, as well as needs among other stakeholders involved in the highway renewal process (e.g., contractors, consultants, utility companies, railroads)
From page 51...
... 51 Discussion Topic Workshop Comments  A stepwise approach to product implementation should be considered for each product. An analogy to this is the implementation of a highway project, which begins with planning, goes to design, and then to construction.
From page 52...
... 52 Discussion Topic Workshop Comments  There are two different ways for implementation to occur. One is at the project or functional level; the other is at the central-office or program level.
From page 53...
... 53  Specifications  Construction  Evaluation/testing Tables 3.9 through 3.13 list the user needs developed for the executives and upper-level management audience corresponding to each of the five renewal product areas. Use of the renewal products for this audience represents an administrative/program-level application (operational application [e.g., administrative direction, policy-related assistance, standards and criteria]
From page 54...
... 54 Table 3.4. Functional/Technical-Level Needs Summary for NDT Area Renewal Projects Project User Needs (Needs Category)
From page 55...
... 55 Table 3.5. Functional/Technical-Level Needs Summary for Bridges Area Renewal Projects Project User Needs (Needs Category)
From page 56...
... 56 2. Structural design (thickness, joints, reinforcement, etc.)
From page 57...
... 57 Table 3.7. Functional/Technical-Level Needs Summary for Utilities/Railroads Area Renewal Projects Project User Needs (Needs Category)
From page 58...
... 58 Table 3.8. Functional/Technical-Level Needs Summary for Project Management/Delivery Area Renewal Projects Project User Needs (Needs Category)
From page 59...
... 59 Table 3.9. Administrative/Program-Level Needs Summary for NDT Area Renewal Projects Project User Needs (Needs Category)
From page 60...
... 60 Table 3.10. Administrative/Program-Level Needs Summary for Bridges Area Renewal Projects Project User Needs (Needs Category)
From page 61...
... 61 Table 3.11. Administrative/Program-Level Needs Summary for Pavements Area Renewal Projects Project User Needs (Needs Category)
From page 62...
... 62 Table 3.12. Administrative/Program-Level Needs Summary for Utilities/Railroads Area Renewal Projects Project User Needs (Needs Category)
From page 63...
... 63 Table 3.13. Administrative/Program-Level Needs Summary for Project Management/Delivery Area Renewal Projects.
From page 64...
... 64 Table 3.14 shows an example cut-out of the revised matrix for functional/technical-level application. It lists the renewal project and user need combinations that would be pertinent to pavement assets covering users throughout the entire highway life cycle.
From page 65...
... 65 Table 3.14. Example Cut-Out of Revised Functional/Technical-Level Integration/Packaging Matrix: Renewal Project and User Need Combinations Pertinent to the Pavements Asset Type Asset Item User Needs Category Project Delivery (project/corridor-level application)
From page 66...
... 66 Table 3.14. Example Cut-Out of Revised Functional/Technical-Level Integration/Packaging Matrix: Renewal Project and User Need Combinations Pertinent to the Pavements Asset Type (continued)
From page 67...
... 67 Table 3.15. Example Cut-Out of Administrative/Program-Level Integration/Packaging Matrix: Renewal Project and User Need Combinations Pertinent to the Bridges Asset Type Asset Item User Needs Category Project Delivery (administrative/program-level application)
From page 68...
... 68 Table 3.15. Example Cut-Out of Administrative/Program-Level Integration/Packaging Matrix: Renewal Project and User Need Combinations Pertinent to the Bridges Asset Type (continued)
From page 69...
... 69 Example 1: Missouri Route 141 Roadway Improvement Project Background The performance specifications developed under R07 were demonstrated as part of highway projects in three locations. These included a roadway improvement project on Route 141 in Chesterfield, Missouri, a bridge rehabilitation project on Route 208 in Spotsylvania and Louisa Counties in Virginia, and an HMA pavement resurfacing project on US-90 (Frontage Road)
From page 70...
... 70 Some of the key outcomes from the demonstration project included the following (Scott et al.
From page 71...
... 71 Example 2: Washington State I-5 Pavement Rehabilitation Background The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) applied the R23 project scoping tool (Guidelines for Long Life Pavement Renewal)
From page 72...
... 72 Implementing the R23 research products helped WSDOT identify a renewal strategy and to successfully complete this rehabilitation project. The scoping tool allowed WSDOT to select a design that saved over $4 million in life-cycle costs compared to the next best alternative and that could be implemented as a rapid renewal project.
From page 73...
... 73  Ability to prioritize which products to implement, based on the relative importance of different needs, the perceived value of each product in addressing the needs, and the perceived risk of implementing each product.  Opportunity to save additional time (accelerated project performance)
From page 74...
... 74 the highway system. This often has the effect of refocusing money, people, and equipment to accomplishing the bare essential tasks, which in turn constrains the ability to innovate and try new ideas.
From page 75...
... 75 that addresses two or three needs or an integrated implementation that also addresses only two or three needs.  Increased Uncertainty and Risk: The more products or technologies to be incorporated into a project, the higher the level of uncertainty and risk.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.