Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 17-29

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 17...
... 17 C h a p t e r 4 Prototype Field Testing Innovation prototypes testing The primary objective of this task (Task 5) was to verify that the performance of the innovation prototypes satisfied the key performance indicators (KPIs)
From page 18...
... 18 analog-to-digital converters and amplifiers. Second, the tests demonstrated that most of the time the team could generate and propagate S-waves in the subsurface soils within the frequency range of interest.
From page 19...
... 19 particular soil type, there were several instrumentation issues that prevented capture of deeper data. This degree of extrapolation highlights the amount of practical prototype development that remains before a field instrument can be deployed.
From page 20...
... 20 laptop. The algorithms had been verified as working correctly, and a user interface is provided on the laptop.
From page 21...
... 21 testing because it provides a measure of the system performance and a means for troubleshooting problems. Archiving the run data could be eliminated from a commercial version of the acoustic locator, but it must remain during the prototype development stage.
From page 22...
... 22 branches of the drain lines may generate echoes or resonances of the injected signal. Multiple signal paths to the sensors could blur the TOF findings and give erroneous depths.
From page 23...
... 23 • Physically examine and test the six sensors to verify their proper operation. • Test the system at a local site that replicates the geometry of the second site.
From page 24...
... 24 consistent with constructive interference of reflections from the two ends of the pipe. As a result, some of the correlation maximums of the reflections were larger than the correlation maximum occurring at the initial time of arrival, causing the algorithm to select the wrong maximum.
From page 25...
... 25 Figure 4.16. Uber Tag at 20-ft depth with no cover.
From page 26...
... 26 Figure 4.18. Uber Tag at 20-ft depth with 5-ft soil cover.
From page 27...
... 27 station antenna is in a coplanar orientation (see Figure 4.15)
From page 28...
... 28 during backfill requires care. Even a small tilt can throw off location by several feet if the tag is at a 20-ft depth.
From page 29...
... 29 applied. In Figure 4.24, the V-Rod is being used in the peak mode, with the antenna parallel to the tag, to identify and locate the tag.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.