Analysis of Naturalistic Driving Study Data: Safer Glances, Driver Inattention, and Crash Risk (2014) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 46-50
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 46... ...
46 C h a p t e r 5 Chapters 5 and 6 focus on the research question, What are the most dangerous glances away from the road, and what are safer glances? To begin the analysis of which glance characteristics are associated with the most risk, the logical place to start is to use the SHRP 2 NDS data to perform a replication of or comparison with the 100-car analyses (Klauer et al.
|
From page 47... ...
47 Only the TEOPTs greater than 2 seconds (Off2.0-6.0) produce an odds ratio with a confidence interval that does not include 1.0.
|
From page 48... ...
48 important because incidents and near crashes are often much more numerous than crashes. Reconsidering the 100-car Eyesoff-Path data and other naturalistic driving study data with this in mind may prove important, as the patterns that emerge from crashes may be very different from near crashes and incidents, if separated.
|
From page 49... ...
49 reveal how the timing of glances away from the road influence crash and near-crash risk. Odds ratios were calculated for four windows of time before the precipitating event.
|
From page 50... ...
50 The analysis that divided the 6-second window at the precipitating event into three 2-second segments revealed significantly high odds ratios. The 2-second segment surrounding the precipitating event (Off1to1afterPE)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.