Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 29-39

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 29...
... 29 C h a p t e r 5 5.1 Metro Dynust Dynamic traffic assignment Model establishment and Calibration For this project, Metro staff created a DynusT regional DTA model. Significant effort went into converting, coding, and debugging the regional model.
From page 30...
... 30 Emme volumes 4 pm – 6 pm D yn u sT v o lu m es 4 p m – 6 p m Figure 5.1. Comparison of 4 p.m.
From page 31...
... 31 Table 5.1. AM Peak-Period Travel Time Comparison Between DynusT and Emme Zone No.
From page 32...
... 32 Figure 5.4. Southwest Corridor study area shown in coral.
From page 33...
... 33 County, Washington) and SMART (Southern Metro Area Regional Transit)
From page 34...
... 34 2. The transit dwell information produced by FAST-TrIPs can be used for the DynusT run in order to account for the delay at transit stops.
From page 35...
... 35 separately using the corresponding fake automobile demand to produce the midday (12 to 1 p.m.) and peak afternoon (4 to 6 p.m.)
From page 36...
... 36 Figure 5.9. Difference in AM peak-period SOV automobile travel times for Southwest Corridor zone pairs (weighted by trips)
From page 37...
... 37 Figure 5.10. Difference in midday SOV automobile travel times for Southwest Corridor zone pairs (weighted by trips)
From page 38...
... 38 Figure 5.11. Difference in AM peak-period total transit travel times for Southwest Corridor zone pairs (weighted by trips)
From page 39...
... 39 Figure 5.12. Difference in midday total transit travel times for Southwest Corridor zone pairs (weighted by trips)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.