Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 13-19

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 13...
... 14 As shown in Table 8, there were slightly more responses by UZAs of more than 1 million (27) than by UZAs of 200,000 to 1 million (24)
From page 14...
... 15 200,000– 1 million % More Than 1 million % Total % UZAs 200,000 and more 137 76 42 24 179 100 TABLE 4 UZAs 200,000 AND MORE IN POPULATION Atlanta, GA Phoenix, AZ Austin, TX Pittsburgh, PA Baltimore, MD Portland, OR–WA Boston, MA Providence, RI–MA Chicago, IL–IN Riverside, CA Cincinnati, OH–KY–IN Sacramento, CA Cleveland, OH San Diego, CA Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX San Francisco/Oakland, CA Detroit, MI San Jose, CA Houston, TX San Juan, PR Kansas City, MO–KS Seattle, WA Los Angeles, CA St.
From page 15...
... 16 200,000– 1 Million More Than 1 Million Total No. That Sub-Allocate 31 31 62 Respondents 24 27 51 Response Rate 77% 87% 82% Source: TCRP SH-14 survey results, March 2013.
From page 16...
... 17 Respondents Use FTA Formula % of Total Respondents by Type Use Local Approach % of Total Respondents by Type Total Transit Operator 17 81 4 19 21 MPO 9 45 11 55 20 State DOT 4 50 4 50 8 Other 3 75 1 25 4 Total 33 63 20 37 531 Source: TCRP SH-14 survey results, March 2013. 1See footnote 2 in Table 10.
From page 17...
... 18 Respondents Average No. of Recipients per UZA Transit Operator 3.9 MPO 6.6 State DOT 5.5 Other1 4.5 Total No.
From page 18...
... 19 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 Re ci pi en ts 3 Re ci pi en ts 4 Re ci pi en ts 5 Re ci pi en ts 6 Re ci pi en ts 7 Re ci pi en ts 8 Re ci pi en ts 9 Re ci pi en ts 10 Re ci pi en ts 11 Re ci pi en ts 12 Re ci pi en ts # of Transit Operators FIGURE 10 Number of FTA Section 5307 recipients in UZAs where transit operators managed the sub-allocation. Average of 3.9 per UZA.
From page 19...
... 20 FIGURE 12 Number of FTA Section 5307 recipients where state DOTs managed the sub-allocation. Average 5.5 per UZA.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.