Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 33-34

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 33...
... 33 state's and HIPAA's requirements (quotation marks omitted) .304 The only difference between HIPAA and the Minnesota statute is the remedy that each provides, not the requirements that each law imposes.305 Therefore, the state statute was not contrary to HIPAA and was in fact "supporting at least one of HIPAA's goals by establishing another disincentive to wrongfully disclose a patient's health care record."306 In Smith v.
From page 34...
... 34 tracts as business associates or subcontractors of business associates of covered entities, contracts in which they may have agreed to comply with HIPAA. However, it is not clear that a transit agency meets HIPAA's definition of a business associate.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.