Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 8-21

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 8...
... 8C H A P T E R 2 Current practice in regional travel forecasting models typically considers the effects of travel times, wait times, frequencies, travel costs, and transfers when evaluating the benefits of transit services and estimating ridership. In many cases, however, models in metropolitan areas with existing rail services require large adjustments to replicated observed ridership patterns.
From page 9...
... Important Non-Traditional Transit Attributes 9 • On-board features that address seating availability, seating comfort, temperature, cleanliness of the transit vehicle, ease of boarding, and productivity features (e.g., Wi-Fi, power outlets, etc.) ; and • Other features, such as identification of the transit vehicle, schedule reliability, schedule span, and fare machines.
From page 10...
... 10 Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Bundle Attribute Premium Characteristics Standard Characteristics St ati on /s to p de si gn fe at ur es Real time information about next transit arrival/departure Real time information available No real time information available Station/stop security Enhanced (e.g., emergency call buttons, surveillance cameras, security personnel) No added security features Station/stop lighting/safety Well lit with police presence Normal lighting and no police presence Station/stop shelter Effectively protects you from bad weather Limited or no shelter Proximity to services Close to coffee shop, dry cleaners, grocery, etc.
From page 11...
... Important Non-Traditional Transit Attributes 11 consideration of a wide range of attributes without imposing undue burden on the respondent in any one experiment. This example in Figure 2 provides only one glimpse into a complex survey, but serves to provide context for similar experimental survey methods.
From page 12...
... 12 Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Effects on Awareness and Consideration of Transit Options The next potential contribution of non-traditional attributes involves traveler awareness of individual transit options and the degree to which travelers are willing to consider using these options. Inclusion of awareness and consideration in travel forecasting models is a relatively new concept.
From page 13...
... Important Non-Traditional Transit Attributes 13 Key Findings Three key findings relate to travelers' awareness and consideration of transit options: 1. Many travelers are not aware of, nor do they consider, transit options that travel models represent as available for their trip.
From page 14...
... 14 Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode This research focused primarily on key findings related to the importance of premium service characteristics and their effect on awareness and consideration, as opposed to broader modeling considerations that go beyond service characteristics. Research Methods Questions about awareness and consideration of transit alternatives were included in the surveys for all three cities surveyed.
From page 15...
... Important Non-Traditional Transit Attributes 15 Awareness and consideration models were developed to identify (1) whether travelers are aware of a transit alternative and (2)
From page 16...
... 16 Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode (6% less for Charlotte and 7% less for Chicago)
From page 17...
... Important Non-Traditional Transit Attributes 17 choice alternatives in both the awareness and consideration models. One primary question for these models is whether representing a traveler's awareness and consideration of transit will improve the ability of the mode choice model to explain travel behavior.
From page 18...
... 18 Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode all three cities while other analyses can only be performed on survey records from Charlotte and Chicago. For example, more respondents from Salt Lake City indicated that they are willing to increase the frequency of transit usage than did respondents from Charlotte and Chicago.
From page 19...
... Important Non-Traditional Transit Attributes 19 trip. For each level of walking time (up to 5 minutes, up to 10 minutes, and up to 20 minutes)
From page 20...
... 20 Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Research Results Table 4 presents the equivalent minutes of in-vehicle travel time for latent variables in the mode choice models. Most of the latent variables reflect large impacts on the choice of transit versus auto, but only few differences between the choice of bus and rail.
From page 21...
... Important Non-Traditional Transit Attributes 21 When comparing modal availability predicted by network path-building models, travelers are more likely to report rail service being available than bus service. This may be because bus systems are more complex than train systems and bus stops are less visible than train stations.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.