Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 53-56

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 53...
... 53 C h a p t e r 6 Many of the assurance and commitment tracking methods described in Chapter 5 may be used at the ecosystem scale. This chapter describes the limits of and approaches for applying these methods at the ecosystem scale.
From page 54...
... 54 doubt to the species and develop reasonable projections of potential conflicts between activities that can occur under the agency's program and the protection of listed species. From these projections, the Services must estimate the potential effects and derive the anticipated level of incidental take that is likely to occur, corresponding to the maximum level of impacts that may be caused by the action (Conner v.
From page 55...
... 55 To respond to agency regulations, successful approaches to advance mitigation must demonstrate avoidance and minimization; in particular, • Project-level practicable alternatives analysis for those with individual permits (40 CFR Sec.
From page 56...
... 56 Considerations to address the risks identified in the working paper for the Willamette Partnership include • Additionality: All credited projects need to demonstrate they provide "additional" conservation benefits. The additionality requirement ensures credits are awarded for doing more than what would otherwise have happened.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.