Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 7-35

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 7...
... 7 chapter three RESULTS AND SYNTHESIS The literature review provided key information on state TMDL programs including the types of BMPs being implemented, their effectiveness, design standards, and associated costs. The literature review findings supplemented the information obtained during the interviews and provided a greater level of detail to present a more comprehensive picture of TMDL and BMP implementation strategies.
From page 8...
... 8 State DOT No. of TMDLs Where the DOT Is Named as a Stakeholder TMDL Pollutants of Concern Comments Kansas 0 N/A KDOT does not foresee TMDLs being implemented in the near future; it focuses on temporary construction stormwater BMPs only (no retrofits)
From page 9...
... 9 One example of an institutional practice is a collaborative approach with the state regulatory agency to TMDL development. As recommended in McGowen et al.
From page 10...
... 10 period. The Minnesota DOT (MnDOT)
From page 11...
... 11 and responsibilities of each party in inspecting, repairing, and maintaining MS4s, bridges, stormwater management basins and ponds, etc., within their respective jurisdictions. In particular, the IA states that the county and DelDOT shall consider TMDLs and various pollution control strategies as provided in a consent decree.
From page 12...
... 12 highway runoff but are less effective at removing nutrients and bacteria. In some cases, the BMPs most likely exported nutrients as a result of fertilizer applications in vegetated BMPs and nitrification in filtration BMPs.
From page 13...
... 13 TABLE 4 EXPECTED EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS FOR BMP TYPES From Caltrans (2004)
From page 14...
... 14 for the water quality design storm because they have no effluent discharge. An example graph for TSS is shown in Figure 2.
From page 15...
... 15 Constituent Influent EMC (mg/L) Influent Load (kg)
From page 16...
... 16 The total included the runoff entering the system plus the bypass water in order to identify the total load to the receiving waters. As shown, accounting for the bypass reduces the performance (i.e., percent removal)
From page 17...
... 17 BMP Type Median (95% Conf. Interval)
From page 18...
... 18 one BMP versus another. However, these results should be used cautiously.
From page 19...
... 19 • Spill prevention and response plans • Education/awareness for the public and employees. Effectiveness of any of these BMPs depends on a number of factors that have been recognized for over a decade (NVPDC 1996)
From page 20...
... 20 urbanized land use back to a more natural landscape. Tree planting is also included in the Maryland Accounting Protocol (MDSHA 2012)
From page 21...
... 21 of anti-icing management is a pilot project implemented by NHDOT. The pilot project tests advanced technology to measure the temperature of the road surface and automatically manage the rate of salt application.
From page 22...
... 22 different though generally similar level of effort for routine maintenance. Based on the DOT interviews, it is the uncertain financial and manpower estimates associated with the infrequent maintenance and the potential for major overhaul of the BMPs that in part fuels the resistance of implementing the new practices.
From page 23...
... 23 here; however, the reader is encouraged to refer to the full reports for additional details. Design Costs There was generally little information available in the literature on design costs.
From page 24...
... 24 • Infiltration Trench CC = 44.108  WQV-0.1991 • Sand Filter CC = 389.00  WQV-0.3951 • Bioretention CC = 0.0001  WQV + 9.00022 • Grass Swales CC = 21.779  ln(A) - 42.543 Where CC is the construction cost expressed in dollars per unit of water-quality volume (WQV)
From page 25...
... 25 data could not be independently verified; and (2) the cost database is small and only contains between one and five examples of each BMP type.
From page 26...
... 26 Life-Cycle Costs As stated earlier, life-cycle costs represent the sum total of design, construction, and O&M. Life-cycle costs are generally not well documented.
From page 27...
... 27 From Caltrans (2004)
From page 28...
... 28 infiltration basins, sand filters, bioretention areas, and vegetated swales. The life-cycle costs are presented as a series of equations where they are the sum of construction costs and design costs, which include design, permitting, erosion control, and contingency costs.
From page 29...
... 29 life. Typical 10-year life-cycle cost estimates include capital costs (construction plus design)
From page 30...
... 30 From King and Hagan (2011)
From page 31...
... 31 NPDES MS4 permit. Within the Los Angeles River watershed, Caltrans operates and maintains 275.5 road miles and a number of park-and-ride facilities and maintenance stations.
From page 32...
... 32 assets comprise only 1% of the watershed. The plan proposes a two-pronged approach including institutional BMPs (vehicle brake pad product replacement, enhancing street sweeping, education and outreach, catch basin cleaning, and downspout retrofits)
From page 33...
... 33 considerations for 21 of the most commonly used runoff treatment BMPs available for highway applications. These are broadly grouped into infiltration, dispersion, biofiltration, wet pool, oil control, and phosphorus control BMPs.
From page 34...
... 34 phosphorus, see Table 18) , in accordance with the Croton Watershed Phase II Phosphorus TMDL Implementation Plan.
From page 35...
... 35 maintains MS4 permit coverage for the SHA roadway storm drain systems in nine Maryland MS4 Phase I counties and in two MS4 Phase II counties. The WIP only applies to these counties.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.